Literature DB >> 27513922

Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.

Sasidhar Uppuganti1,2, Mathilde Granke1,2, Mary Kate Manhard3,4, Mark D Does3,4, Daniel S Perrien1,2,4,5, Donald H Lee1, Jeffry S Nyman1,2,3,5.   

Abstract

Unlike the known relationships between traditional mechanical properties and microstructural features of bone, the factors that influence the mechanical resistance of bone to cyclic reference point microindention (cRPI) and impact microindention (IMI) have yet to be identified. To determine whether cRPI and IMI properties depend on microstructure, we indented the tibia mid-shaft, the distal radius, and the proximal humerus from 10 elderly donors using the BioDent and OsteoProbe (neighboring sites). As the only output measure of IMI, bone material strength index (BMSi) was significantly different across all three anatomical sites being highest for the tibia mid-shaft and lowest for the proximal humerus. Total indentation distance (inverse of BMSi) was higher for the proximal humerus than for the tibia mid-shaft but was not different between other anatomical comparisons. As a possible explanation for the differences in BMSi, pore water, as determined by 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance, was lowest for the tibia and highest for the humerus. Moreover, the local intra-cortical porosity, as determined by micro-computed tomography, was negatively correlated with BMSi for both arm bones. BMSi was also positively correlated with peak bending stress of cortical bone extracted from the tibia mid-shaft. Microstructural correlations with cRPI properties were not significant for any of the bones. The one exception was that average energy dissipated during cRPI was negatively correlated with local tissue mineral density in the tibia mid-shaft. With higher indentation force and larger tip diameter than cRPI, only IMI appears to be sensitive to the underlying porosity of cortical bone.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1442-1452, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone strength; bound water; pore water; porosity; reference point indentation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27513922      PMCID: PMC5530367          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  31 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Matthew T Drake; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Louise K McCready; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Reference-point indentation correlates with bone toughness assessed using whole-bone traditional mechanical testing.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Comparison of cyclic and impact-based reference point indentation measurements in human cadaveric tibia.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Miranda Van Vliet; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Bone Tissue Properties Measurement by Reference Point Indentation in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Leonardo Mellibovsky; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Fernando Mellibovsky; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Xavier Nogués; Connor Randall; Paul K Hansma; Adolfo Díez-Perez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Jeffry S Nyman; Daniel F Gochberg; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Microstructural and compositional contributions towards the mechanical behavior of aging human bone measured by cyclic and impact reference point indentation.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Avinesh Agarwalla; Aditya Yadavalli; Jenny Y Liu; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Reference point indentation is insufficient for detecting alterations in traditional mechanical properties of bone under common experimental conditions.

Authors:  John B Krege; Mohammad W Aref; Erin McNerny; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  A High Amount of Local Adipose Tissue Is Associated With High Cortical Porosity and Low Bone Material Strength in Older Women.

Authors:  Daniel Sundh; Robert Rudäng; Michail Zoulakis; Anna G Nilsson; Anna Darelid; Mattias Lorentzon
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Bone material strength is associated with areal BMD but not with prevalent fractures in older women.

Authors:  R Rudäng; M Zoulakis; D Sundh; H Brisby; A Diez-Perez; L Johansson; D Mellström; A Darelid; M Lorentzon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  5 in total

1.  Local bone quality measurements correlates with maximum screw torque at the femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Christopher M McAndrew; Avinesh Agarwalla; Adam C Abraham; Eric Feuchtbaum; William M Ricci; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  PTH and bone material strength in hypoparathyroidism as measured by impact microindentation.

Authors:  J R Starr; G Tabacco; R Majeed; B Omeragic; L Bandeira; M R Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  In Vitro-Induced High Sugar Environments Deteriorate Human Cortical Bone Elastic Modulus and Fracture Toughness.

Authors:  Kelly Merlo; Jacob Aaronson; Rachana Vaidya; Taraneh Rezaee; Vijaya Chalivendra; Lamya Karim
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Bone tissue quality in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance.

Authors:  Guillermina Orduna; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Eugenia Abella; Xavier Nogués; Roser Granero; Natalia García-Giralt; Marta Pineda-Moncusí; Roberto Güerri-Fernández; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Adolfo Díez-Pérez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manuela Schoeb; Neveen A T Hamdy; Frank Malgo; Elizabeth M Winter; Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.