Literature DB >> 27060155

A Prospective Evaluation of Early Detection Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer in the European EPIC Cohort.

Kathryn L Terry1, Helena Schock2, Renée T Fortner2, Anika Hüsing2, Raina N Fichorova3, Hidemi S Yamamoto3, Allison F Vitonis4, Theron Johnson2, Kim Overvad5, Anne Tjønneland6, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault7, Sylvie Mesrine7, Gianluca Severi8, Laure Dossus9, Sabina Rinaldi9, Heiner Boeing10, Vassiliki Benetou11, Pagona Lagiou11, Antonia Trichopoulou11, Vittorio Krogh12, Elisabetta Kuhn13, Salvatore Panico14, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita15, N Charlotte Onland-Moret16, Petra H Peeters16, Inger Torhild Gram17, Elisabete Weiderpass18, Eric J Duell19, Maria-Jose Sanchez20, Eva Ardanaz21, Nerea Etxezarreta22, Carmen Navarro23, Annika Idahl24, Eva Lundin25, Karin Jirström26, Jonas Manjer26, Nicholas J Wareham27, Kay-Tee Khaw28, Karl Smith Byrne29, Ruth C Travis29, Marc J Gunter30, Melissa A Merritt30, Elio Riboli30, Daniel W Cramer4, Rudolf Kaaks31.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate early detection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis.
RESULTS: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker.
CONCLUSIONS: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4664-75. ©2016 AACRSee related commentary by Skates, p. 4542. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27060155      PMCID: PMC5026545          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  29 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.

Authors:  Sheri D Schully; Danielle M Carrick; Leah E Mechanic; Sudhir Srivastava; Garnet L Anderson; John A Baron; Christine D Berg; Jennifer Cullen; Eleftherios P Diamandis; V Paul Doria-Rose; Katrina A B Goddard; Susan E Hankinson; Lawrence H Kushi; Eric B Larson; Lisa M McShane; Richard L Schilsky; Steven Shak; Steven J Skates; Nicole Urban; Barnett S Kramer; Muin J Khoury; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  HE4 combined with CA125: favorable screening tool for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nasrin Ghasemi; Samira Ghobadzadeh; Mahnaz Zahraei; Hemn Mohammadpour; Salahadin Bahrami; Mohammad Bakhshi Ganje; Shokoh Rajabi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  A 2-stage ovarian cancer screening strategy using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) identifies early-stage incident cancers and demonstrates high positive predictive value.

Authors:  Karen H Lu; Steven Skates; Mary A Hernandez; Deepak Bedi; Therese Bevers; Leroy Leeds; Richard Moore; Cornelius Granai; Steven Harris; William Newland; Olasunkanmi Adeyinka; Jeremy Geffen; Michael T Deavers; Charlotte C Sun; Nora Horick; Herbert Fritsche; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.

Authors:  E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm.

Authors:  T Van Gorp; I Cadron; E Despierre; A Daemen; K Leunen; F Amant; D Timmerman; B De Moor; I Vergote
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Risk Algorithm Using Serial Biomarker Measurements Doubles the Number of Screen-Detected Cancers Compared With a Single-Threshold Rule in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Andy Ryan; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Anne Dawnay; Mariam Habib; Sophia Apostolidou; Naveena Singh; Elizabeth Benjamin; Matthew Burnell; Susan Davies; Aarti Sharma; Richard Gunu; Keith Godfrey; Alberto Lopes; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Howard Jenkins; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John B Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Ian Scott; Lesley Fallowfield; Martin Widschwendter; Karina Reynolds; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Mahesh Parmar; Steven J Skates; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Assessing lead time of selected ovarian cancer biomarkers: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Martin McIntosh; Lieling Wu; Matt Barnett; Gary Goodman; Jason D Thorpe; Lindsay Bergan; Mark D Thornquist; Nathalie Scholler; Nam Kim; Kathy O'Briant; Charles Drescher; Nicole Urban
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Blood and urine markers for ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kathryn L Terry; Patrick M Sluss; Steven J Skates; Samuel C Mok; Bin Ye; Allison F Vitonis; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  41 in total

1.  Complementary Longitudinal Serum Biomarkers to CA125 for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Archana R Simmons; Evangelia Ourania Fourkala; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Margie N Sutton; Keith Baggerly; Hui Zheng; Karen H Lu; Ian Jacobs; Steven Skates; Usha Menon; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-04-09

2.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Emerging diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Abdul Hafeez Kandhro; Adel Gouri; Wafaa Mahfoud; Noureddine Louanjli; Brahim Saadani; Said Afqir; Mariam Amrani
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.730

4.  Predicting Circulating CA125 Levels among Healthy Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Naoko Sasamoto; Ana Babic; Bernard A Rosner; Renée T Fortner; Allison F Vitonis; Hidemi Yamamoto; Raina N Fichorova; Anne Tjønneland; Louise Hansen; Kim Overvad; Marina Kvaskoff; Agnès Fournier; Francesca Romana Mancini; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Eleni Peppa; Anna Karakatsani; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Chiara C Grasso; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Elisabete Weiderpass; J Ramón Quirós; Leila Lujan-Barroso; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Sandra Colorado-Yohar; Aurelio Barricarte; Miren Dorronsoro; Annika Idahl; Eva Lundin; Hanna Sartor; Kay-Tee Khaw; Timothy J Key; David Muller; Elio Riboli; Marc J Gunter; Laure Dossus; Rudolf Kaaks; Daniel W Cramer; Shelley S Tworoger; Kathryn L Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  EPIC Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Skates
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Nanotechnology and Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Tracing New Landscapes.

Authors:  Bruna Corradetti; Simone Pisano; Robert Steven Conlan; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Tumor-associated autoantibodies as early detection markers for ovarian cancer? A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Rudolf Kaaks; Renée Turzanski Fortner; Anika Hüsing; Myrto Barrdahl; Marika Hopper; Theron Johnson; Anne Tjønneland; Louise Hansen; Kim Overvad; Agnès Fournier; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Marina Kvaskoff; Laure Dossus; Mattias Johansson; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Carlo La Vecchia; Sabina Sieri; Amalia Mattiello; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Giuseppe Matullo; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Inger T Gram; Elisabete Weiderpass; Maria-Jose Sánchez; Carmen Navarro Sanchez; Eric J Duell; Eva Ardanaz; Nerea Larranaga; Eva Lundin; Annika Idahl; Karin Jirström; Björn Nodin; Ruth C Travis; Elio Riboli; Melissa Merritt; Dagfinn Aune; Kathryn Terry; Daniel W Cramer; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Novel Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Denise R Nebgen; Karen H Lu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Anti-CA15.3 and Anti-CA125 Antibodies and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Results from the EPIC Cohort.

Authors:  Daniel W Cramer; Raina N Fichorova; Kathryn L Terry; Hidemi Yamamoto; Allison F Vitonis; Eva Ardanaz; Dagfinn Aune; Heiner Boeing; Jenny Brändstedt; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Miren Dorronsoro; Laure Dossus; Eric J Duell; Inger T Gram; Marc Gunter; Louise Hansen; Annika Idahl; Theron Johnson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Vittorio Krogh; Marina Kvaskoff; Amalia Mattiello; Giuseppe Matullo; Melissa A Merritt; Björn Nodin; Philippos Orfanos; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Domenico Palli; Eleni Peppa; J Ramón Quirós; Maria-Jose Sánchez-Perez; Gianluca Severi; Anne Tjønneland; Ruth C Travis; Antonia Trichopoulou; Rosario Tumino; Elisabete Weiderpass; Renée T Fortner; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Vaginal microbiomes and ovarian cancer: a review.

Authors:  Jinyun Xu; Jing-Jie Peng; Wenqing Yang; Kun Fu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.