Literature DB >> 30948451

Predicting Circulating CA125 Levels among Healthy Premenopausal Women.

Naoko Sasamoto1,2, Ana Babic2,3, Bernard A Rosner2,4, Renée T Fortner5, Allison F Vitonis6, Hidemi Yamamoto7, Raina N Fichorova2,7, Anne Tjønneland8, Louise Hansen8, Kim Overvad9, Marina Kvaskoff10,11, Agnès Fournier10,11, Francesca Romana Mancini10,11, Heiner Boeing12, Antonia Trichopoulou13,14, Eleni Peppa13, Anna Karakatsani13,15, Domenico Palli16, Valeria Pala17, Amalia Mattiello18, Rosario Tumino19, Chiara C Grasso20, N Charlotte Onland-Moret21, Elisabete Weiderpass22,23,24,25, J Ramón Quirós26, Leila Lujan-Barroso27, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco28,29, Sandra Colorado-Yohar30,31, Aurelio Barricarte32,33, Miren Dorronsoro34, Annika Idahl35,36, Eva Lundin37, Hanna Sartor38,39, Kay-Tee Khaw40, Timothy J Key41, David Muller42, Elio Riboli43, Marc J Gunter43, Laure Dossus43, Rudolf Kaaks5, Daniel W Cramer6,2, Shelley S Tworoger44, Kathryn L Terry6,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarker to date. Multiple studies reported CA125 levels vary by personal characteristics, which could inform personalized CA125 thresholds. However, this has not been well described in premenopausal women.
METHODS: We evaluated predictors of CA125 levels among 815 premenopausal women from the New England Case Control Study (NEC). We developed linear and dichotomous (≥35 U/mL) CA125 prediction models and externally validated an abridged model restricting to available predictors among 473 premenopausal women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study (EPIC).
RESULTS: The final linear CA125 prediction model included age, race, tubal ligation, endometriosis, menstrual phase at blood draw, and fibroids, which explained 7% of the total variance of CA125. The correlation between observed and predicted CA125 levels based on the abridged model (including age, race, and menstrual phase at blood draw) had similar correlation coefficients in NEC (r = 0.22) and in EPIC (r = 0.22). The dichotomous CA125 prediction model included age, tubal ligation, endometriosis, prior personal cancer diagnosis, family history of ovarian cancer, number of miscarriages, menstrual phase at blood draw, and smoking status with AUC of 0.83. The abridged dichotomous model (including age, number of miscarriages, menstrual phase at blood draw, and smoking status) showed similar AUCs in NEC (0.73) and in EPIC (0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: We identified a combination of factors associated with CA125 levels in premenopausal women. IMPACT: Our model could be valuable in identifying healthy women likely to have elevated CA125 and consequently improve its specificity for ovarian cancer screening. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30948451      PMCID: PMC6548604          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  26 in total

1.  Factors influencing serum CA125II levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D K Pauler; U Menon; M McIntosh; H L Symecko; S J Skates; I J Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification.

Authors:  Stef van Buuren
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  The epidemiology of CA-125 in women without evidence of ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial.

Authors:  Christine C Johnson; Bruce Kessel; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Craig R Williams; Jian-Lun Xu; Saundra S Buys
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  CA125 and endometriosis.

Authors:  M Muyldermans; F J Cornillie; P R Koninckx
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  CA125 in ovarian cancer: European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for clinical use.

Authors:  M J Duffy; J M Bonfrer; J Kulpa; G J S Rustin; G Soletormos; G C Torre; M K Tuxen; M Zwirner
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals.

Authors:  E B Rimm; E L Giovannucci; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; L B Litin; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Fluctuations in CA 125 and CA 15-3 serum concentrations during spontaneous ovulatory cycles.

Authors:  G G Bon; P Kenemans; J J Dekker; P G Hompes; R A Verstraeten; G J van Kamp; J Schoemaker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Assessing ovarian cancer risk when considering elective oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy.

Authors:  Allison F Vitonis; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Peripheral CA 125 levels in patients with uterine fibroids.

Authors:  P Bischof; M A Galfetti; J Seydoux; J U von Hospenthal; A Campana
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.

Authors:  E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with serum CA125 level in women without ovarian cancer in the United States: a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Jingzhou Zhang; Yu Cao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Epidemiologic and biologic correlates of serum HE4 and CA125 in women from the National Health and Nutritional Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Daniel W Cramer; Allison F Vitonis; Naoko Sasamoto; Hidemi Yamamoto; Raina N Fichorova
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Racial/ethnic differences in average CA125 and CA15.3 values and its correlates among postmenopausal women in the USA.

Authors:  Naoko Sasamoto; Allison F Vitonis; Raina N Fichorova; Hidemi S Yamamoto; Kathryn L Terry; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Evaluation of CA125 in relation to pain symptoms among adolescents and young adult women with and without surgically-confirmed endometriosis.

Authors:  Naoko Sasamoto; Mary DePari; Allison F Vitonis; Marc R Laufer; Stacey A Missmer; Amy L Shafrir; Kathryn L Terry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.