| Literature DB >> 29473162 |
Rudolf Kaaks1, Renée Turzanski Fortner1, Anika Hüsing1, Myrto Barrdahl1, Marika Hopper2, Theron Johnson1, Anne Tjønneland3, Louise Hansen3, Kim Overvad4, Agnès Fournier5,6, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault5,6, Marina Kvaskoff5,6, Laure Dossus7, Mattias Johansson7, Heiner Boeing8, Antonia Trichopoulou9,10, Vassiliki Benetou9,10, Carlo La Vecchia9,11, Sabina Sieri12, Amalia Mattiello13, Domenico Palli14, Rosario Tumino15, Giuseppe Matullo16, N Charlotte Onland-Moret17, Inger T Gram18, Elisabete Weiderpass18,19,20,21, Maria-Jose Sánchez22,23, Carmen Navarro Sanchez23,24,25, Eric J Duell26, Eva Ardanaz23,27, Nerea Larranaga28, Eva Lundin29, Annika Idahl30, Karin Jirström31, Björn Nodin31, Ruth C Travis32, Elio Riboli33, Melissa Merritt33,34, Dagfinn Aune33, Kathryn Terry35,36, Daniel W Cramer35,36, Karen S Anderson2.
Abstract
Immuno-proteomic screening has identified several tumor-associated autoantibodies (AAb) that may have diagnostic capacity for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, with AAbs to P53 proteins and cancer-testis antigens (CTAGs) as prominent examples. However, the early detection potential of these AAbs has been insufficiently explored in prospective studies. We performed ELISA measurements of AAbs to CTAG1A, CTAG2, P53 and NUDT11 proteins, for 194 patients with ovarian cancer and 705 matched controls from the European EPIC cohort, using serum samples collected up to 36 months prior to diagnosis under usual care. CA125 was measured using electrochemo-luminiscence. Diagnostic discrimination statistics were calculated by strata of lead-time between blood collection and diagnosis. With lead times ≤6 months, ovarian cancer detection sensitivity at 0.98 specificity (SE98) varied from 0.19 [95% CI 0.08-0.40] for CTAG1A, CTAG2 and NUDT1 to 0.23 [0.10-0.44] for P53 (0.33 [0.11-0.68] for high-grade serous tumors). However, at longer lead-times, the ability of these AAb markers to distinguish future ovarian cancer cases from controls declined rapidly; at lead times >1 year, SE98 estimates were close to zero (all invasive cases, range: 0.01-0.11). Compared to CA125 alone, combined logistic regression scores of AAbs and CA125 did not improve detection sensitivity at equal level of specificity. The added value of these selected AAbs as markers for ovarian cancer beyond CA125 for early detection is therefore limited.Entities:
Keywords: antibodies; early detection; prospective validation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29473162 PMCID: PMC6019150 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396