Literature DB >> 27059984

[Possibilities and limitations of amblyopia screening with auto-refractometers].

O Ehrt1.   

Abstract

Amblyopia is a frequent vision disorder with a prevalence of 3-6%, for which early treatment is more effective. More than half of the cases of amblyopia are due to refractive errors so that they are not obvious due to strabismus or other ocular abnormalities; therefore, examinations for early recognition are essential. Because no nationwide ophthalmological examination of infants with cycloplegia has been established in Germany, screening for refractive errors in the first 3 years of life could be very helpful. Only children with a very high risk of ametropia should be referred for a full ophthalmological and orthoptic assessment of cycloplegia in order to prevent excess prescription of eyeglasses. Mild amblyopia with a borderline refraction error can be more reliably detected with visual acuity tests at a later age of 3-4 years and still be treated successfully before entering school. Even with a good sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90%, refraction screening with handheld binocular video refractometers has a positive predictive value of 30%, which should be considered acceptable; however, screening with refractometers alone is insufficient to detect all types of amblyopia. Cataracts can easily be detected in >95% of patients but microstrabismus <6° cannot be detected with sufficient reliability. If other risk factors, such as a negative Lang stereopsis test, ptosis, other ocular abnormalities, developmental delay or a positive family history are present, a full ophthalmological evaluation with cycloplegic refraction is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cycloplegics; Ocular refraction; Screening; Squint; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059984     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-016-0248-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  16 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Natural history of infantile anisometropia.

Authors:  M Abrahamsson; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening.

Authors:  J Atkinson; O Braddick; B Robier; S Anker; D Ehrlich; J King; P Watson; A Moore
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  [Detection of amlyogenic risk factors with the vision screener S 04].

Authors:  R W Strauss; O Ehrt
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Calibration and validation of the 2WIN photoscreener compared to the PlusoptiX S12 and the SPOT.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirk; M Diane Armitage; Shelley Dunn; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.402

Review 6.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  J Carlton; J Karnon; C Czoski-Murray; K J Smith; J Marr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue; Brian Arthur; Daniel E Neely; Robert W Arnold; David Silbert; James B Ruben
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Screening for refractive errors in preschool children with the vision screener.

Authors:  Oliver Ehrt; Anne Weber; Klaus-Peter Boergen
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar

9.  Comparison between two hand-held autorefractors: the Sure-Sight and the Retinomax.

Authors:  M Cordonnier; V De Maertelaer
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2004-12

Review 10.  Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.209

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Refractive errors.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Christina Kraus; Peter Baumbach; Judith Ungewiß; Ralf Michels
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.594

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.