Literature DB >> 27839543

Refractive errors.

Ulrich Schiefer1, Christina Kraus, Peter Baumbach, Judith Ungewiß, Ralf Michels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All over the world, refractive errors are among the most frequently occuring treatable distur - bances of visual function. Ametropias have a prevalence of nearly 70% among adults in Germany and are thus of great epidemiologic and socio-economic relevance.
METHODS: In the light of their own clinical experience, the authors review pertinent articles retrieved by a selective literature search employing the terms "ametropia, "anisometropia," "refraction," "visual acuity," and epidemiology."
RESULTS: In 2011, only 31% of persons over age 16 in Germany did not use any kind of visual aid; 63.4% wore eyeglasses and 5.3% wore contact lenses. Refractive errors were the most common reason for consulting an ophthalmologist, accounting for 21.1% of all outpatient visits. A pinhole aperture (stenopeic slit) is a suitable instrument for the basic diagnostic evaluation of impaired visual function due to optical factors. Spherical refractive errors (myopia and hyperopia), cylindrical refractive errors (astigmatism), unequal refractive errors in the two eyes (anisometropia), and the typical optical disturbance of old age (presbyopia) cause specific functional limitations and can be detected by a physician who does not need to be an ophthalmologist.
CONCLUSION: Simple functional tests can be used in everyday clinical practice to determine quickly, easily, and safely whether the patient is suffering from a benign and easily correctable type of visual impairment, or whether there are other, more serious underlying causes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27839543      PMCID: PMC5143802          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  27 in total

Review 1.  The ageing lens.

Authors:  A J Bron; G F Vrensen; J Koretz; G Maraini; J J Harding
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  [Possibilities and limitations of amblyopia screening with auto-refractometers].

Authors:  O Ehrt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Pitfalls in the determination of distance glasses].

Authors:  B Lachenmayr
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery.

Authors:  S Jain; I Arora; D T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 5.  The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures.

Authors:  B Gilmartin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [Pitfalls in the prescription of reading glasses].

Authors:  H-K Krause
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 7.  Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Kent P Bashford; George Shafranov; Shachar Tauber; M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  The age-dependent effect of anisometropia magnitude on anisometropic amblyopia severity.

Authors:  Alejandro Leon; Sean P Donahue; David G Morrison; Robert L Estes; Chun Li
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  Prevalence of refractive errors in the European adult population: the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS).

Authors:  Christian Wolfram; René Höhn; Ulrike Kottler; Philipp Wild; Maria Blettner; Jens Bühren; Norbert Pfeiffer; Alireza Mirshahi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-16
View more
  11 in total

1.  Caution Required in Cases With Vitreous Opacities.

Authors:  Jean-Cyriaque Barry
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Some Additions.

Authors:  Dieter Schmidt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  In Reply.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Benefits of using corneal topography to choose subjective refraction technique in keratoconus (RE-CON): a prospective comparative crossover clinical study.

Authors:  Margaux Metzger; Valentin Navel; Jean-Vincent Barrière; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Jérémy Hébraud; Aurélien Mulliez; Laurence Béral; Frédéric Chiambaretta; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Simulated optical performance of soft contact lenses on the eye.

Authors:  Ahmed Abass; Samantha Stuart; Bernardo T Lopes; Dong Zhou; Brendan Geraghty; Richard Wu; Steve Jones; Ilse Flux; Reinier Stortelder; Arnoud Snepvangers; Renato Leca; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Simulation of the Effect of Material Properties on Soft Contact Lens On-Eye Power.

Authors:  Joshua Moore; Bernardo T Lopes; Ashkan Eliasy; Brendan Geraghty; Richard Wu; Lynn White; Ahmed Elsheikh; Ahmed Abass
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09

7.  Analysis of Tear Ferning Patterns in Young Female Subjects with Refractive Errors.

Authors:  Mana A Alanazi; Gamal A El-Hiti; Alaa Al-Madani; Raied Fagehi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 8.  Lighting in the Home and Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Oluwapelumi Osibona; Bethlehem D Solomon; Daniela Fecht
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Assessing the prevalence of refractive errors and accuracy of vision screening by schoolteachers in Liberia.

Authors:  Patrick Tobi; Nazaradden Ibrahim; Alex Bedell; Imran Khan; Emma Jolley; Elena Schmidt
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.131

10.  Changes of Subjective Symptoms and Tear Film Biomarkers following Femto-LASIK.

Authors:  Teresa Tsai; Mohannad Alwees; Anika Rost; Janine Theile; H Burkhard Dick; Stephanie C Joachim; Suphi Taneri
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.