Literature DB >> 8976694

Natural history of infantile anisometropia.

M Abrahamsson1, J Sjöstrand.   

Abstract

AIMS/
BACKGROUND: In a previous study longitudinal changes of anisometropia were investigated. It was shown that anisometropia arises and vanishes during the emmetropisation process and that the associated risk for amblyopia is low. The aim of this study was to follow acuity and refraction longitudinally in children with marked anisometropia at 1 year of age.
METHODS: Refractive errors and visual acuity were estimated every sixth month for a selected group of 20 children with marked anisometropia > or = 3.0 D (spherical equivalent) at 1 year of age from approximately 3 to 10 years of age.
RESULTS: The children could be classified into three groups. In six subjects the anisometropia increased (mean 1.4 D) and they all developed amblyopia. The remaining children could be classified into two groups of equal size. One group developed no amblyopia and the anisometropia decreased with a mean of 3.0 D. The seven remaining children developed amblyopia and/or strabismus; the mean anisometropia decrease was 1.2 D.
CONCLUSION: Anisometropia at 1 year of age that is larger or equal to 3.0 D will in 90% of the cases still be there at 10 years of age. There is a substantial risk of this group developing amblyopia (60%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976694      PMCID: PMC505638          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.10.860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  16 in total

1.  Comparative changes in the error of refraction between fixing and amblyopic eyes during growth and development.

Authors:  C W Lepard
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Anisometropia and strabismus.

Authors:  W L Phelps; J Muir
Journal:  Am Orthopt J       Date:  1977

3.  Prevalence of monocular amblyopia among anisometropes.

Authors:  T Tanlamai; D A Goss
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1979-11

4.  Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys.

Authors:  L F Hung; M L Crawford; E L Smith
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Mechanisms of amblyopia.

Authors:  G K Noorden
Journal:  Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  1977

6.  Refractive errors and other ocular findings in school children.

Authors:  L Laatikainen; H Erkkilä
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980

7.  Anisometropia and changes in anisometropia in school myopia.

Authors:  O Pärssinen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Anisometropia in children: analysis of a hospital population.

Authors:  J de Vries
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  An animal model of myopia.

Authors:  E Raviola; T N Wiesel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Refraction of 1-year-old children after atropine cycloplegia.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  17 in total

1.  Laterality of amblyopia.

Authors:  Michael Repka; Kurt Simons; Raymond Kraker
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Perceptual learning improves neural processing in myopic vision.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yan; Jiawei Zhou; Wuxiao Zhao; Min Li; Jie Xi; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Prevalence and associations of anisometropia and aniso-astigmatism in a population based sample of 6 year old children.

Authors:  S C Huynh; X Y Wang; J Ip; D Robaei; A Kifley; K A Rose; P Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Axial length, anterior chamber depth-a study in different age groups and refractive errors.

Authors:  Veena Bhardwaj; Gandhi Parth Rajeshbhai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-10-05

5.  [Possibilities and limitations of amblyopia screening with auto-refractometers].

Authors:  O Ehrt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Recovery in microtropia: implications for aetiology and neurophysiology.

Authors:  M Cleary; C A Houston; R M McFadzean; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the development of amblyopia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

8.  Factors influencing visual outcome in anisometropic amblyopes.

Authors:  C J Cobb; K Russell; A Cox; C J MacEwen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  One sister and brother with mirror image myopic anisometropia.

Authors:  Sung Joon Park; Joo Yeon Kim; Seung-Hee Baek; Eung Suk Kim; Ungsoo S Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-05

Review 10.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.