Literature DB >> 27043214

Accuracy of 4D Flow Measurement of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in the Cervical Spine: An In Vitro Verification Against Numerical Simulation.

Soroush Heidari Pahlavian1,2, Alexander C Bunck3,4, Suraj Thyagaraj1,2, Daniel Giese3, Francis Loth1,2, Dennis M Hedderich3, Jan Robert Kröger4, Bryn A Martin5.   

Abstract

Abnormal alterations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow are thought to play an important role in pathophysiology of various craniospinal disorders such as hydrocephalus and Chiari malformation. Three directional phase contrast MRI (4D Flow) has been proposed as one method for quantification of the CSF dynamics in healthy and disease states, but prior to further implementation of this technique, its accuracy in measuring CSF velocity magnitude and distribution must be evaluated. In this study, an MR-compatible experimental platform was developed based on an anatomically detailed 3D printed model of the cervical subarachnoid space and subject specific flow boundary conditions. Accuracy of 4D Flow measurements was assessed by comparison of CSF velocities obtained within the in vitro model with the numerically predicted velocities calculated from a spatially averaged computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model based on the same geometry and flow boundary conditions. Good agreement was observed between CFD and 4D Flow in terms of spatial distribution and peak magnitude of through-plane velocities with an average difference of 7.5 and 10.6% for peak systolic and diastolic velocities, respectively. Regression analysis showed lower accuracy of 4D Flow measurement at the timeframes corresponding to low CSF flow rate and poor correlation between CFD and 4D Flow in-plane velocities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D Flow measurement; Cerebrospinal fluid; Computational fluid dynamics; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phantom experiment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27043214      PMCID: PMC5050060          DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1602-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro large artery bypass graft model.

Authors:  Joy P Ku; Christopher J Elkins; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Effects of proteins, blood cells and glucose on the viscosity of cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  I G Bloomfield; I H Johnston; L E Bilston
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.162

3.  Microsurgical anatomy of the dorsal cervical nerve roots and the cervical dorsal root ganglion/ventral root complexes.

Authors:  C H Alleyne; C M Cawley; D L Barrow; G D Bonner
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1998-09

4.  Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data.

Authors:  P G Walker; G B Cranney; M B Scheidegger; G Waseleski; G M Pohost; A P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Magnetic resonance 4D flow characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid at the craniocervical junction and the cervical spinal canal.

Authors:  Alexander C Bunck; Jan-Robert Kröger; Alena Jüttner; Angela Brentrup; Barbara Fiedler; Frank Schaarschmidt; Gerard R Crelier; Wolfram Schwindt; Walter Heindel; Thomas Niederstadt; David Maintz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Development of a large-animal model to measure dynamic cerebrospinal fluid pressure during spinal cord injury: Laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Claire F Jones; Jae H T Lee; Brian K Kwon; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-04-20

7.  Robust 4D flow denoising using divergence-free wavelet transform.

Authors:  Frank Ong; Martin Uecker; Umar Tariq; Albert Hsiao; Marcus T Alley; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Michael Lustig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of cerebrospinal fluid pressure in Chiari malformation and syringomyelia.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Clarke; David F Fletcher; Marcus A Stoodley; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The impact of spinal cord nerve roots and denticulate ligaments on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Theresia Yiallourou; R Shane Tubbs; Alexander C Bunck; Francis Loth; Mark Goodin; Mehrdad Raisee; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantitative Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Gradients in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Naokazu Hayashi; Mitsunori Matsumae; Satoshi Yatsushiro; Akihiro Hirayama; Afnizanfaizal Abdullah; Kagayaki Kuroda
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.742

View more
  10 in total

1.  Anthropomorphic Model of Intrathecal Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics Within the Spinal Subarachnoid Space: Spinal Cord Nerve Roots Increase Steady-Streaming.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Khani; Lucas R Sass; Tao Xing; M Keith Sharp; Olivier Balédent; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Comparison of phase-contrast MR and flow simulations for the study of CSF dynamics in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Erika Kristina Lindstrøm; Jakob Schreiner; Geir Andre Ringstad; Victor Haughton; Per Kristian Eide; Kent-Andre Mardal
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-02-21

3.  Nonuniform Moving Boundary Method for Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Intrathecal Cerebrospinal Flow Distribution in a Cynomolgus Monkey.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Khani; Tao Xing; Christina Gibbs; John N Oshinski; Gregory R Stewart; Jillynne R Zeller; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  An MRI-Compatible Hydrodynamic Simulator of Cerebrospinal Fluid Motion in the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Suraj Thyagaraj; Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Lucas R Sass; Francis Loth; Morteza Vatani; Jae-Won Choi; R Shane Tubbs; Daniel Giese; Jan-Robert Kroger; Alexander C Bunck; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.

Authors:  Philip A Corrado; Rafael Medero; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.737

6.  Hydraulic resistance of periarterial spaces in the brain.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tithof; Douglas H Kelley; Humberto Mestre; Maiken Nedergaard; John H Thomas
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2019-06-20

7.  In vitro and numerical simulation of blood removal from cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of lumbar drain to Neurapheresis therapy.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Khani; Lucas R Sass; M Keith Sharp; Aaron R McCabe; Laura M Zitella Verbick; Shivanand P Lad; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-03-16

8.  Quantification of arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics by magnetic resonance imaging under simulated micro-gravity conditions: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Arslan M Zahid; Bryn Martin; Stephanie Collins; John N Oshinski; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  In vitro evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid velocity measurement in type I Chiari malformation: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement using 2D phase contrast and 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Williams; Suraj Thyagaraj; Audrey Fu; John Oshinski; Daniel Giese; Alexander C Bunck; Eleonora Fornari; Francesco Santini; Mark Luciano; Francis Loth; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 10.  Translational Approaches for Brain Delivery of Biologics via Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Shraddha S Sadekar; Mayumi Bowen; Hao Cai; Samira Jamalian; Hanine Rafidi; Whitney Shatz-Binder; Julien Lafrance-Vanasse; Pamela Chan; William J Meilandt; Amy Oldendorp; Alavattam Sreedhara; Ann Daugherty; Susan Crowell; Kristin R Wildsmith; Jasvinder Atwal; Reina N Fuji; Joshua Horvath
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.903

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.