Literature DB >> 22519927

Development of a large-animal model to measure dynamic cerebrospinal fluid pressure during spinal cord injury: Laboratory investigation.

Claire F Jones1, Jae H T Lee, Brian K Kwon, Peter A Cripton.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in considerable permanent neurological impairment, and unfortunately, the successful translation of effective treatments from laboratory models to human patients is lacking. This may be partially attributed to differences in anatomy, physiology, and scale between humans and rodent models. One potentially important difference between the rodent and human spinal cord is the presence of a significant CSF volume within the intrathecal space around the human cord. While the CSF may "cushion" the spinal cord, pressure waves within the CSF at the time of injury may contribute to the extent and severity of the primary injury. The objective of this study was to develop a model of contusion SCI in a miniature pig and establish the feasibility of measuring spinal CSF pressure during injury.
METHODS: A custom weight-drop device was used to apply thoracic contusion SCI to 17 Yucatan miniature pigs. Impact load and velocity were measured. Using fiber optic pressure transducers implanted in the thecal sac, CSF pressures resulting from 2 injury severities (caused by 50-g and 100-g weights released from a 50-cm height) were measured.
RESULTS: The median peak impact loads were 54 N and 132 N for the 50-g and 100-g injuries, respectively. At a nominal 100 mm from the injury epicenter, the authors observed a small negative pressure peak (median -4.6 mm Hg [cranial] and -5.8 mm Hg [caudal] for 50 g; -27.6 mm Hg [cranial] and -27.2 mm Hg [caudal] for 100 g) followed by a larger positive pressure peak (median 110.5 mm Hg [cranial] and 77.1 mm Hg [caudal] for 50 g; 88.4 mm Hg [cranial] and 67.2 mm Hg [caudal] for 100 g) relative to the preinjury pressure. There were no significant differences in peak pressure between the 2 injury severities or the caudal and cranial transducer locations.
CONCLUSIONS: A new model of contusion SCI was developed to measure spinal CSF pressures during the SCI event. The results suggest that the Yucatan miniature pig is an appropriate model for studying CSF, spinal cord, and dura interactions during injury. With further development and characterization it may be an appropriate in vivo large-animal model of SCI to answer questions regarding pathological changes, therapeutic safety, or treatment efficacy, particularly where humanlike dimensions and physiology are important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22519927     DOI: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  11 in total

1.  Intraspinal Pressure Monitoring in a Patient with Spinal Cord Injury Reveals Different Intradural Compartments: Injured Spinal Cord Pressure Evaluation (ISCoPE) Study.

Authors:  Isaac Phang; Marios C Papadopoulos
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Spinal Cord Injury in the Mouse Using the Infinite Horizon Spinal Cord Impactor.

Authors:  Courtney A Bannerman; Nader Ghasemlou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  An ovine model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Saul Wilson; Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; John W Miller; Chandan G Reddy; Sina Safayi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicholas D Jeffery; Nicole A DeVries-Watson; Sara K Shivapour; Stephanus Viljoen; Brian D Dalm; Katherine N Gibson-Corley; Michael D Johnson; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Rat model of spinal cord injury preserving dura mater integrity and allowing measurements of cerebrospinal fluid pressure and spinal cord blood flow.

Authors:  Marc Soubeyrand; Elisabeth Laemmel; Charles Court; Arnaud Dubory; Eric Vicaut; Jacques Duranteau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Accuracy of 4D Flow Measurement of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics in the Cervical Spine: An In Vitro Verification Against Numerical Simulation.

Authors:  Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Alexander C Bunck; Suraj Thyagaraj; Daniel Giese; Francis Loth; Dennis M Hedderich; Jan Robert Kröger; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Review of the UBC Porcine Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Femke Streijger; Neda Manouchehri; Kitty So; Katelyn Shortt; Elena B Okon; Seth Tigchelaar; Peter Cripton; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-08-31

7.  A new technique for minimal invasive complete spinal cord injury in minipigs.

Authors:  Elena E Foditsch; Gratian Miclaus; Irina Patras; Ioan Hutu; Karin Roider; Sophina Bauer; Günter Janetschek; Ludwig Aigner; Reinhold Zimmermann
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Dynamic changes in intramedullary pressure 72 hours after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Chang-Bin Liu; De-Gang Yang; Chuan Qin; Xue-Chao Dong; Da-Peng Li; Chao Zhang; Yun Guo; Liang-Jie Du; Feng Gao; Ming-Liang Yang; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Early sacral neuromodulation ameliorates urinary bladder function and structure in complete spinal cord injury minipigs.

Authors:  Elena E Keller; Irina Patras; Ioan Hutu; Karin Roider; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Ludwig Aigner; Günter Janetschek; Lukas Lusuardi; Reinhold Zimmermann; Sophina Bauer
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.696

10.  Gene-modified leucoconcentrate for personalized ex vivo gene therapy in a mini pig model of moderate spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Rustem R Islamov; Farid V Bashirov; Mikhail E Sokolov; Andrei A Izmailov; Filip O Fadeev; Vage A Markosyan; Maria A Davleeva; Olga V Zubkova; Maxim M Smarov; Denis Yu Logunov; Boris S Naroditskyi; Ilnur I Salafutdinov; Albert A Rizvanov; Ramil G Turaev
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.