Literature DB >> 27042133

Childhood obesity: prevention is better than cure.

Aakash Pandita1, Deepak Sharma2, Dharti Pandita3, Smita Pawar4, Mir Tariq5, Avinash Kaul6.   

Abstract

Obesity and its associated comorbidities have emerged as a major health problem garnering interests from both public health agencies and mainstream media consumers. With increasing awareness on its impact on health, finances, and community at large, it has come to the forefront for scientific research and development of health plans. The need for better strategies and novel interventions to manage obesity is now being recognized by the entire health care system. Obesity and overweight is now the fifth leading global risk factor for mortality. Strategic investment is thus urgently needed to implement population-based childhood obesity prevention programmes which are effective and also culturally appropriate. Population-based prevention is crucial to stem this rising tide of childhood obesity which is fast reaching epidemic proportions. Obesity has its onset very early in life; therefore, children constitute a major group of this disease. It is thus imperative to lay utmost importance on prevention of obesity in children and herald its progress, if present already. Furthermore, treatment is still in preliminary stage, so early prevention holds better than treatment at later stages. This article is an attempt to lay emphasis on childhood obesity as a problem that needs to be recognized early and measures for its prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; body mass index; nutrition assessment; obesity; overweight; prevention; treatment

Year:  2016        PMID: 27042133      PMCID: PMC4801195          DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S90783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes        ISSN: 1178-7007            Impact factor:   3.168


Introduction

Obesity and its assessment

The mechanisms involved in weight regulation and the development of obesity in children are varied and include genetic, environmental, and developmental factors. The relative importance of each of these mechanisms varies substantially between individuals and populations and is a subject of ongoing research.1 IOTF (International Obesity Task Force) defines overweight and obesity in children 2–18 years of age using body mass index (BMI) cutoff points of 25 and 30 kg/m2, respectively.2 As the child’s BMI varies with age, different age-specific cutoffs have been used to define overweight and obesity. Children are thus defined as being overweight or obese if they have a BMI above the cutoff for the given age and sex.3,4 Accurate height and weight measurements are an integral part of general physical examination. Its role in early recognition of excessive weight gain makes it an important component of any visit to a primary health care center.5 BMI is now recommended as the single best indicator of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents in clinical practice.6–8

Why should we care about childhood obesity?

There are two main reasons to target childhood obesity. First, overweight and obese children and teens are much more likely to become obese as adults compared to normal BMI children, and second, it is more challenging for these adults to lose the excess weight once they become obese. Newer drugs and bariatric procedures for treating obesity-related health problems have emerged but these procedures are costly and have their own complications. Thus, prevention of childhood obesity with emphasis on increased physical activity is of prime importance.9–11 The modern society and culture has managed to oust routine physical activity out of everyday life for most children and made energy dense, low nutrient food and beverages more affordable and accessible, making them far more appealing than their healthier counterparts. Behavioral changes and lifestyle modifications are the primary tools for reducing obesity. However, if the environment contributes to the unhealthy eating practices and sedentary lifestyle, strategies and interventions relying solely on individual “self-control” will not be very effective. Children are less equipped to make informed choices about what is healthy and what is not, making it all the more important to concentrate on modifying the environment. This will provide children with healthy food options and improve their physical activity level, thus reducing the risk of obesity.12 Furthermore, obese children today are getting affected by diseases and health problems previously observed only in adults; many obese children today are developing health problems that once afflicted only adults. Chronic illnesses like diabetes mellitus and heart disease have an earlier onset and a prolonged course in these obese children, and even though the disease might remain undiagnosed until adulthood, the resulting complications are more severe leading to a shorter life.13 Childhood obesity leads to many short- and long-term complications (Table 1).
Table 1

Complications associated with childhood obesity

Acute1416• Type 2 diabetes
• Hypertension
• Hyperlipidemia
• Precocious puberty
• Ovarian hyperandrogenism
• Gynecomastia
• Cholecystitis
• Pancreatitis
• Pseudotumor cerebri
• Fatty liver
• Renal disease (focal glomerulosclerosis)
Orthopedic disorders17• Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
• Tibia vara
• Blount disease
Liver and gall bladder dysfunction18• Elevated transaminases
• Cholecystitis
Physical and psychological1921• Depression
• Eating disorders
• Social isolation
• Sleep disorders
Cardiovascular and endocrine2224• Hyperinsulinism and insulin resistance
• Hypercholesterolemia
• Hypertriglyceridemia
• Low levels of high-density lipoprotein
• Hypertension
• Polycystic ovary syndrome
• Coronary artery disease
• Left ventricular hypertrophy
Cancer17• Colorectal carcinoma
Long-term 23,25• Ischemic heart disease
• Short life span
• Stroke
• Sudden death

Prevention of childhood obesity

Prevention is the key to success for obesity control as many, but not all, obese children will eventually become obese adults. “Tracking” or the likelihood of persistence of childhood obesity into adulthood is related to the age. The management of obesity in adults is a difficult and often unsuccessful feat especially in the absence of a known organic etiopathogenesis (eg, leptin deficiency, other hormonal abnormalities). Prevention of childhood obesity on the other hand can be more rewarding, providing better chances for reducing long-term complications. There are three levels of prevention in dealing with childhood obesity:26–28 Primordial prevention: deals with keeping a healthy weight and a normal BMI throughout childhood and into the teens. Primary prevention: aims to prevent overweight children from becoming obese. Secondary prevention: directed toward the treatment of obesity so as to reduce the comorbidities and reverse overweight and obesity if possible. Inculcating healthy practices like plant-based foods and fruit consumption and inclusion of exercises and active lifestyle form the pillars of the prevention programme.29–31 All the previously mentioned strategies when combined together can be put into practice sequentially from perinatal period to adolescence as follows: Perinatal: this includes adequate prenatal nutrition with optimal maternal weight gain, good blood sugar control in diabetics, postpartum weight loss with exercises and nutritional counseling.32 Infancy: early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months followed by inclusion of solid foods, providing a balanced diet with avoidance of unhealthy calorie-rich snacks and close monitoring of weight gain.33–35 Preschool: providing nutritional education to parents and children so as to develop healthy eating practices, offer healthy food preferences by giving early experience of different food and flavors, and following closely the rate of weight gain to prevent early adiposity rebound.36 Childhood: monitoring both the weight and height, preventing excessive prepubertal adiposity, provide nutritional counseling, and emphasis on daily physical activity.37 Adolescence: prevent the increase in weight after growth spurt, maintain healthy eating behavior, and reinforcing the need for daily exercises and workouts.38–39 Furthermore, advocate nutritional goals, such as the traffic light diet: Green – GO: includes food which are low in calories and can be eaten without any restrictions. Yellow – CAUTION: food items with moderate high calorie content and can be eaten only in moderation. Red – STOP: high calorie food items which should be avoided or eaten rarely.40,41

Physical activity and behavior therapy

Physical activity is the key component for prevention and management of obesity.42,43 Preschool children require unstructured activities and thus will benefit from outdoor play and games. On the other hand, school going children and adolescents require at least 60 minutes of daily physical activity out of which 30 minutes should be structured activities like sports and supervised exercises.44–46 This has also been recommended by American Academy of Pediatrics.47 Simply providing education on obesity-related health risks, nutrition, and physical activity is insufficient to induce behavioral change. The best-established counseling techniques used for pediatric obesity treatment use a behavioral change model, which includes the following elements: Self-monitoring of target behaviors (logs of food, activity, or other behaviors recorded by patient or family). This allows the child and family to recognize the behaviors contributing to their weight gain. Clinician feedback throughout the self-monitoring process is essential to monitor the behavior change. A patient’s food log may also identify other contributors to eating behaviors, such as the meal-time environment, boredom, and level of hunger, all of which can be valuable in the evaluation of stimulus control. Stimulus control to reduce environmental cues that contribute to unhealthy behaviors. This includes reducing access to unhealthy behaviors (eg, removing some categories of food from the house or removing a television from the bedroom) and also efforts to establish new, healthier daily routines (such as making fruits and vegetables more accessible). Goal-setting for healthy behaviors rather than strict weight goals. Goal-setting is widely used for inspiring behavioral change. However, the process can be detrimental if goals are not realistic and maintainable. Appropriate goals are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely (“SMART”). Contracting for selected nutrition or activity goals. Contracting is the explicit agreement to give a reward for the achievement of a specific goal. This helps children focus on specific behaviors and provides structure and incentive to their goal-setting process. Positive reinforcement of target behaviors. Positive reinforcement can be in the form of praise for healthy behaviors or in the form of rewards for achieving specific goals. The reward should be negotiated by the parent and the child, ideally facilitated by the provider to ensure that the rewards are appropriate. Rewards should be small activities or privileges that the child can participate in frequently, rather than monetary incentives or toys; food should not be used as a reward.48–53 Despite some discrepancy in study outcomes of increasing physical activity as a means to lower BMI, increasing the physical activity level of the child and family is a key focus in obesity treatment.54–57 As with nutrition goals, strategies for increasing physical activity are individualized. Clinicians should take into account the developmental stage of the child, family schedule, and personal preferences for activity, while being mindful of sedentary activity. Clinicians can support the change process by consistently advising children and families to be physically active, suggesting options and encouraging goal-setting. In addition, community participation can be encouraged by forming partnerships with local fitness centers and schools. To increase physical activity in children, it is often helpful to consider a variety of options. Structured physical activity (organized sports or performance arts) may be team-based or individual and competitive or noncompetitive. Less structured activities include recreational sports with peers or family, self-directed physical training, and lifestyle activity. Although these categories overlap, they provide expanded and diverse options and increase the opportunities for physical activity for the child and family. For preschool-aged children, unstructured activity like outdoor play is simple and useful.58 Providers can boost the level of activity in this age group by “prescribing” playground time and providing a list of local resources (playgrounds or other opportunities for active play), in addition to discouraging sedentary time (television use). The provider can also encourage parents to consider physical activity levels when they make choices regarding day care and after-school programs. Substantial evidence supports the importance of reducing sedentary activity as a means of preventing and treating obesity in children.59,60–63 Reducing sedentary activity has the secondary benefit of reducing the calorie intake and thus may prove to be more effective than increasing structured physical activity.54 In developed countries, overindulgence in leisure activities and entertainments like television, computer and Internet, virtual gaming, and other media are the root cause of sedentary lifestyle. In fact, television viewing is the single best established environmental cause in the evolution of childhood obesity. Data on the role of other media in the development of obesity are lacking. It is recommended that television viewing and other “screen time” (other than homework) is restricted to less than 2 hours daily, and that children under age 2 years avoid television altogether.64 Because many children initially will view television substantially more than this target, the first step should be in decreasing their present amount. School-wide campaigns and messages, and behavioral interventions using reinforcement and reward strategies have been effective in reducing television use.60 Behavioral treatment strategies, detailed earlier, such as self-monitoring, can also be useful. Children and families should first monitor their present amount of media use and then set goals to reduce it. The following recommendations are made in keeping with the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement.64 No television set in child’s bedroom No television viewing during meals Maximum time for television and media viewing of 2 hours or some strategy that approximates this limit No media viewing for children under 2 years of age Substituting healthier behaviors and entertainment is helpful for accomplishment of these goals. For younger children, this is through the use of “active games” such as tag, hula hooping, and obstacle courses. Quiet, nonmedia activities such as reading aloud or playing board games are also acceptable substitutes, because they avoid television advertising and establish patterns of family interaction that may ultimately lead to active play. Taking activity breaks during television commercials both reduces exposure to advertising and establishes specific windows for activity; an average hour of television features ~20 minutes of commercials with half of them being food related. Strategies to reduce media use for older children are more variable and are best addressed through a combination of self-monitoring, establishment of family media limits, and negotiation to identify substitute activities. Because both media and homework are often accessed through the computer, it can be difficult for a parent to monitor a child’s actual media use. For these and other reasons, engagement of the child in the behavior-change process is essential, using the behavioral strategies outlined earlier.

Pediatric experience with drugs

Experience with pediatric use of weight loss drugs has surfaced and some of the findings are promising. However, anorectic drugs are not recommended for routine use for childhood obesity. The efficacy and safety of these drugs have to be established by controlled clinical trials before prescribing them in prepubertal children. In the case of post-pubertal adolescents who have failed to respond to behavioral therapy and diet modifications, use of anorectic drugs can be considered. All adolescents on medical therapy should be encouraged to engage in physical activity and should concurrently receive nutritional education and joint family counseling.65–70

Newer modalities

Many therapies that have been tried and are still in early phase or have met little success are “hunger training”, which aims to teach people to eat only when blood glucose is below a set target. Although it appears promising as a weight loss strategy, it is still to be proved so.71 Based on the same principle, Biofeedback Enhanced Lifestyle Intervention has also been put to test in the recent past.72 For this technique (also known as “hunger recognition”), participants are given a portable self-monitoring (blood glucose) device and instructed to eat only when physical hunger is confirmed (blood glucose in the target range of 60–85 mg/dL). Many people find these techniques as uncomfortable, embarrassing, and inconvenient. In addition to the previously mentioned techniques, there are certain biochemical markers that are markers of satiety like glucagon-like peptide and cholecystokinin. Leptin is another useful marker primarily stimulated by carbohydrates in diet that can be used for long-term appetite responses.73 A lot needs to be investigated further to come to a complete understanding of this field.

Conclusion

Childhood obesity today constitutes one of the most serious health concerns, both in the developed and developing world. Obesity in childhood is causative for many chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, and some carcinomas. It also has psychosocial consequences and may contribute to a delay in academic and social functioning as well as poor self-esteem and depression. The interventions for preventing and controlling obesity are mainly aimed at limiting the intake of sugar and high calorie snacks with higher consumption of vegetable- and fruit-based diet. This includes eating calcium-rich high-fiber diet with balanced micronutrients, daily healthy breakfasts and home cooked family meals, smaller portion size, and a curtailment in eating-out. Last but not least, decreasing the duration of “screen time”, especially television, and increasing the level of physical activity are vital for preventing childhood obesity. Over the last 30 years, the prevalence of childhood obesity has increased exponentially. Multifaceted strategies involving the public and private health sectors along with community participation are required to gradually reverse this trend.
  69 in total

1.  Validity of the body mass index as an indicator of the risk and presence of overweight in adolescents.

Authors:  R M Malina; P T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Biomarkers of satiation and satiety.

Authors:  Cees de Graaf; Wendy A M Blom; Paul A M Smeets; Annette Stafleu; Henk F J Hendriks
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Health-related quality of life of severely obese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Tasha M Burwinkle; James W Varni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Intensive therapies for pediatric obesity.

Authors:  J A Yanovski
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.278

5.  Overweight, fat patterning, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white girls: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study.

Authors:  J A Morrison; D L Sprecher; B A Barton; M A Waclawiw; S R Daniels
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  G S Berenson; S R Srinivasan; W Bao; W P Newman; R E Tracy; W A Wattigney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  [Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of obesity in childhood].

Authors:  A Crinò; N A Greggio; L Beccaria; R Schiaffini; A Pietrobelli; C Maffeis
Journal:  Minerva Pediatr       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.312

8.  Effects of decreasing sedentary behavior and increasing activity on weight change in obese children.

Authors:  L H Epstein; A M Valoski; L S Vara; J McCurley; L Wisniewski; M A Kalarchian; K R Klein; L R Shrager
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

10.  Adherence to hunger training using blood glucose monitoring: a feasibility study.

Authors:  M R Jospe; R C Brown; M Roy; R W Taylor
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.169

View more
  48 in total

1.  Implementing School-Based Policies to Prevent Obesity: Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Kathleen O'Connor Duffany; Fatma M Shebl; Sue M Peters; Margaret A Read; Kathryn R Gilstad-Hayden; Marlene B Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Susceptibility to Food Advertisements and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake in Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Adolescents.

Authors:  Meredith M Cervi; Tanya Agurs-Collins; Laura A Dwyer; Chan L Thai; Richard P Moser; Linda C Nebeling
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

Review 3.  Epidemic obesity in children and adolescents: risk factors and prevention.

Authors:  Eun Young Lee; Kun-Ho Yoon
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Personalizing the Dietary Guidelines: Use of a feedback report to help adolescent students plan health behaviors using a SMART goal approach.

Authors:  Sarah Martin; Moonseong Heo; Camille C Jimenez; Jean Lim; David W Lounsbury; Lynn Fredericks; Michelle Bouchard; Tara Herrera; April Sosa; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Child Adolesc Obes       Date:  2019-08-14

5.  Accuracy of body mass index in categorizing weight status in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Michele Polfuss; Bethany Forseth; Dale A Schoeller; Chiang-Ching Huang; Andrea Moosreiner; Paula E Papanek; Kathleen J Sawin; Kimberley Zvara; Linda Bandini
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2021

6.  Dose-Response Relationship of a Blended In-Person and Online Family-Based Childhood Obesity Management Program: Secondary Analysis of a Behavior Intervention.

Authors:  Sam Liu; Nicholas Smith; Kayla Nuss; Megan Perdew; Dimas Adiputranto; Patti-Jean Naylor
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2022-07-05

7.  Regional variation in lifestyle patterns and BMI in young children: the GECKO Drenthe cohort.

Authors:  H Marike Boezen; Rikstje Wiersma; Richard H Rijnks; Gianni Bocca; Esther Hartman; Eva Corpeleijn
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Family-based intervention to prevent childhood obesity among school-age children of low socioeconomic status: study protocol of the FIVALIN project.

Authors:  C Homs; P Berruezo; G Según; L Estrada; J de Bont; J Riera-Romaní; E Carrillo-Álvarez; H Schröder; R Milà; S F Gómez
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 9.  Methodological Aspects of Diet Quality Indicators in Childhood: A Mapping Review.

Authors:  Ángela Hernández-Ruiz; Liza Alejandra Díaz-Jereda; Casandra Madrigal; María José Soto-Méndez; Anneleen Kuijsten; Ángel Gil
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 11.567

10.  The longitudinal association between early-life screen viewing and abdominal adiposity-findings from a multiethnic birth cohort study.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Bernard; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Natarajan Padmapriya; Mya-Thway Tint; Suresh Anand Sadananthan; Navin Michael; Bozhi Chen; Shirong Cai; Jia Ying Toh; Carla Lanca; Kok Hian Tan; Seang Mei Saw; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Yap Seng Chong; Peter D Gluckman; Yung Seng Lee; Fabian Yap; Marielle V Fortier; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Keith M Godfrey; Johan G Eriksson; S Sendhil Velan; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.