Jeannette R Ickovics1, Kathleen O'Connor Duffany2, Fatma M Shebl2, Sue M Peters3, Margaret A Read4, Kathryn R Gilstad-Hayden5, Marlene B Schwartz4. 1. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale-NUS College, Singapore. Electronic address: jeannette.ickovics@yale.edu. 2. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. New Haven Public Schools, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Healthier school environments can benefit students, and school wellness policies may result in meaningful enhancements. Schools participating in federal child nutrition programs must implement wellness policies as mandated by law. The primary study objective is to assess effectiveness of implementing school-based nutrition and physical activity policies on student BMI trajectories. STUDY DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial using 2 × 2 factorial design. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve randomly selected schools in an urban district. Students were followed for 3 years through middle school, fifth to eighth grades (2011-2015, n=595 students, 92.3% participation, 85.2% retention). INTERVENTION: Specific to randomized condition, support was provided for implementation of nutrition policies (e.g., alternatives to food-based rewards/celebrations) and physical activity policies (e.g., opportunities for physical activity during/after school). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex-/age-adjustedBMI percentile and BMI z-score; behavioral indicators. Data collected via standardized protocols. RESULTS: Analyses followed intention-to-treat principles, with planned secondary analyses (conducted 2016-2018). Students at schools randomized to receive support for nutrition policy implementation had healthier BMI trajectories over time (F=3.20, p=0.02), with a greater magnitude over time and cumulatively significant effects 3 years post-intervention (β=-2.40, p=0.04). Overall, students at schools randomized to receive the nutrition intervention had an increase in BMI percentile of <1%, compared with students in other conditions, whereas BMI percentile increased 3%-4%. There was no difference in student BMI between those in schools with and without physical activity policy implementation. Examining behavioral correlates in eighth grade, students at schools randomized to the nutrition condition consumed fewer unhealthy foods and sugar-sweetened beverages, and ate less frequently at fast-food restaurants (all p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This cluster randomized trial demonstrated effectiveness of providing support for implementation of school-based nutrition policies, but not physical activity policies, to limit BMI increases among middle school students. Results can guide future school interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02043626.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Healthier school environments can benefit students, and school wellness policies may result in meaningful enhancements. Schools participating in federal child nutrition programs must implement wellness policies as mandated by law. The primary study objective is to assess effectiveness of implementing school-based nutrition and physical activity policies on student BMI trajectories. STUDY DESIGN: Cluster randomized trial using 2 × 2 factorial design. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve randomly selected schools in an urban district. Students were followed for 3 years through middle school, fifth to eighth grades (2011-2015, n=595 students, 92.3% participation, 85.2% retention). INTERVENTION: Specific to randomized condition, support was provided for implementation of nutrition policies (e.g., alternatives to food-based rewards/celebrations) and physical activity policies (e.g., opportunities for physical activity during/after school). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex-/age-adjusted BMI percentile and BMI z-score; behavioral indicators. Data collected via standardized protocols. RESULTS: Analyses followed intention-to-treat principles, with planned secondary analyses (conducted 2016-2018). Students at schools randomized to receive support for nutrition policy implementation had healthier BMI trajectories over time (F=3.20, p=0.02), with a greater magnitude over time and cumulatively significant effects 3 years post-intervention (β=-2.40, p=0.04). Overall, students at schools randomized to receive the nutrition intervention had an increase in BMI percentile of <1%, compared with students in other conditions, whereas BMI percentile increased 3%-4%. There was no difference in student BMI between those in schools with and without physical activity policy implementation. Examining behavioral correlates in eighth grade, students at schools randomized to the nutrition condition consumed fewer unhealthy foods and sugar-sweetened beverages, and ate less frequently at fast-food restaurants (all p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This cluster randomized trial demonstrated effectiveness of providing support for implementation of school-based nutrition policies, but not physical activity policies, to limit BMI increases among middle school students. Results can guide future school interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02043626.
Authors: Deanna M Hoelscher; Alicia Moag-Stahlberg; Karen Ellis; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Raja Malkani Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Pearl Anna McElfish; Lisa Smith; Karra Sparks; Williamina Ioanna Bing; Sharlynn Lang; Amber Estes; Michael Stephens Journal: Hawaii J Health Soc Welf Date: 2019-11
Authors: Julia Dabravolskaj; Genevieve Montemurro; John Paul Ekwaru; Xiu Yun Wu; Kate Storey; Sandra Campbell; Paul J Veugelers; Arto Ohinmaa Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Moazzam Tanveer; Andreas Hohmann; Nadeem Roy; Asifa Zeba; Umar Tanveer; Maximilian Siener Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros; Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo; Daniel Garcia; Victor Hugo Oliveira Segundo; Ádala Nayana de Sousa Mata; Anny Karoliny Pinheiro Fernandes; Raquel Praxedes Dos Santos; Débora Danielly Barros de Brito Trindade; Isabel Morales Moreno; Daniel Guillén Martínez; Grasiela Piuvezam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-24 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Natasha P Sobers; Lisa Bishop; Shu Wen Ng; Suzanne Soares-Wynter; Natalie S Greaves; Madhuvanti M Murphy Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-07-17