Literature DB >> 28260144

Susceptibility to Food Advertisements and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake in Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Adolescents.

Meredith M Cervi1, Tanya Agurs-Collins2, Laura A Dwyer3, Chan L Thai4, Richard P Moser3, Linda C Nebeling3.   

Abstract

Obesity among adolescents in the United States has risen by 16% in the past 30 years. One important contributing factor may be the increased consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs), which is encouraged by advertisements for unhealthy foods and drinks that are targeted to adolescents. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the association between susceptibility to food and drink advertisements and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) adolescents and to examine if BMI is associated with SSB consumption. Data were obtained from 765 NHB and NHW of ages 14-17 who were surveyed in the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Two weighted adjusted logistic regression models were conducted. The first examined the associations of advertisement susceptibility, race, and BMI with SSB consumption. The second examined the associations of race and BMI with advertisement susceptibility. Adolescents with high advertisement susceptibility were more likely to consume at least one SSB daily (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.21, 2.47). Additionally, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to consume at least one SSB daily (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.08, 2.85) and more likely to be highly susceptible to advertisements (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.19, 2.48) than non-Hispanic whites. No significant associations were found between BMI and advertising susceptibility or BMI and daily SSB consumption. One approach to addressing the consumption of SSBs may be to reduce advertising that markets unhealthy food and beverages to adolescents and minorities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Food advertising; Racial disparities; Sugar-sweetened beverages

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28260144     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0313-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  37 in total

Review 1.  Television advertising and branding. Effects on eating behaviour and food preferences in children.

Authors:  Emma J Boyland; Jason C G Halford
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Adolescent exposure to food advertising on television.

Authors:  Lisa M Powell; Glen Szczypka; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vasanti S Malik; Matthias B Schulze; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  An experimental study on the effects of exposure to magazine advertising on children's food choices.

Authors:  Sandra C Jones; Lisa Kervin
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Recommended community strategies and measurements to prevent obesity in the United States.

Authors:  Laura Kettel Khan; Kathleen Sobush; Dana Keener; Kenneth Goodman; Amy Lowry; Jakub Kakietek; Susan Zaro
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2009-07-24

6.  Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Zefeng Zhang; Edward W Gregg; W Dana Flanders; Robert Merritt; Frank B Hu
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Beverage consumption is not associated with changes in weight and body mass index among low-income preschool children in North Dakota.

Authors:  P K Newby; Karen E Peterson; Catherine S Berkey; Jill Leppert; Walter C Willett; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-07

8.  Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.

Authors:  J R Hebert; L Clemow; L Pbert; I S Ockene; J K Ockene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  By how much would limiting TV food advertising reduce childhood obesity?

Authors:  J Lennert Veerman; Eduard F Van Beeck; Jan J Barendregt; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Is Adversely Associated with Childhood Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Ching-Jung Yu; Jung-Chieh Du; Hsien-Chih Chiou; Chun-Cheng Feng; Ming-Yi Chung; Winnie Yang; Ying-Sheue Chen; Ling-Chu Chien; Betau Hwang; Mei-Lien Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  10 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating among low-income Latino adolescents.

Authors:  Amy L Beck; Esti Iturralde; Julissa Haya-Fisher; Sarah Kim; Victoria Keeton; Alicia Fernandez
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Black Community Conversations About Opposing Ethnically Targeted Marketing of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages.

Authors:  Tiffany M Eaton; Shiriki Kumanyika; Katherine Isselmann DiSantis; Kenna Yadeta; Sonya Grier
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2021-08-20

3.  Food Insecurity and the Association between Perceptions and Trust of Food Advertisements and Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods among U.S. Parents and Adolescents.

Authors:  Reah Chiong; Roger Figueroa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Applying the socio-ecological model to understand factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverage behaviours among rural Appalachian adolescents.

Authors:  Brittany A McCormick; Kathleen J Porter; Wen You; Maryam Yuhas; Annie L Reid; Esther J Thatcher; Jamie M Zoellner
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.022

5.  Identifying food marketing to teenagers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Emily Truman; Charlene Elliott
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  The Relationship between Self-Reported Exposure to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Promotions and Intake: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2017 International Food Policy Study.

Authors:  Hannah Forde; Martin White; Louis Levy; Felix Greaves; David Hammond; Lana Vanderlee; Stephen Sharp; Jean Adams
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  An Exploration of the Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage in Promoting Obesity and Health Disparities.

Authors:  Desiree M Sigala; Kimber L Stanhope
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 8.  Praegnatio Perturbatio-Impact of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Authors:  Vasantha Padmanabhan; Wenhui Song; Muraly Puttabyatappa
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 19.871

9.  Soft Drinks and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Advertising in Spain: Correlation between Nutritional Values and Advertising Discursive Strategies.

Authors:  Mireia Montaña Blasco; Mònika Jiménez-Morales
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Perceptions of Arguments in Support of Policies to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption Among Low-Income White, Black and Latinx Parents of Young Children.

Authors:  Julie S Cannon; Elizabeth K Farkouh; Liana B Winett; Lori Dorfman; A Susana Ramírez; Spencer Lazar; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2021-07-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.