Yu Xin Yang1, Mei Sian Chong2,3, Laura Tay2,3, Suzanne Yew2, Audrey Yeo2, Cher Heng Tan4. 1. Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. yuxin_yang@ttsh.com.sg. 2. Institute of Geriatrics and Active Ageing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a machine learning based automated segmentation method that jointly analyzes the four contrasts provided by Dixon MRI technique for improved thigh composition segmentation accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The automatic detection of body composition is formulized as a three-class classification issue. Each image voxel in the training dataset is assigned with a correct label. A voxel classifier is trained and subsequently used to predict unseen data. Morphological operations are finally applied to generate volumetric segmented images for different structures. We applied this algorithm on datasets of (1) four contrast images, (2) water and fat images, and (3) unsuppressed images acquired from 190 subjects. RESULTS: The proposed method using four contrasts achieved most accurate and robust segmentation compared to the use of combined fat and water images and the use of unsuppressed image, average Dice coefficients of 0.94 ± 0.03, 0.96 ± 0.03, 0.80 ± 0.03, and 0.97 ± 0.01 has been achieved to bone region, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and muscle respectively. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method based on machine learning produces accurate tissue quantification and showed an effective use of large information provided by the four contrast images from Dixon MRI.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a machine learning based automated segmentation method that jointly analyzes the four contrasts provided by Dixon MRI technique for improved thigh composition segmentation accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The automatic detection of body composition is formulized as a three-class classification issue. Each image voxel in the training dataset is assigned with a correct label. A voxel classifier is trained and subsequently used to predict unseen data. Morphological operations are finally applied to generate volumetric segmented images for different structures. We applied this algorithm on datasets of (1) four contrast images, (2) water and fat images, and (3) unsuppressed images acquired from 190 subjects. RESULTS: The proposed method using four contrasts achieved most accurate and robust segmentation compared to the use of combined fat and water images and the use of unsuppressed image, average Dice coefficients of 0.94 ± 0.03, 0.96 ± 0.03, 0.80 ± 0.03, and 0.97 ± 0.01 has been achieved to bone region, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT), and muscle respectively. CONCLUSION: Our proposed method based on machine learning produces accurate tissue quantification and showed an effective use of large information provided by the four contrast images from Dixon MRI.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body composition; Dixon sequence; Image segmentation; MRI; Machine learning
Authors: Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Jaclyn M Sions; Emma H Beisheim; Mark A Hoggarth; James M Elliott; Gregory E Hicks; Ryan T Pohlig; Mayank Seth Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Jana Kemnitz; Felix Eckstein; Adam G Culvenor; Anja Ruhdorfer; Torben Dannhauer; Susanne Ring-Dimitriou; Alexandra M Sänger; Wolfgang Wirth Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Sarah Schlaeger; Friedemann Freitag; Elisabeth Klupp; Michael Dieckmeyer; Dominik Weidlich; Stephanie Inhuber; Marcus Deschauer; Benedikt Schoser; Sarah Bublitz; Federica Montagnese; Claus Zimmer; Ernst J Rummeny; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Magnus Borga; Janne West; Jimmy D Bell; Nicholas C Harvey; Thobias Romu; Steven B Heymsfield; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard Journal: J Investig Med Date: 2018-03-25 Impact factor: 2.895