Robert Hemke1,2, Colleen G Buckless1, Andrew Tsao1, Benjamin Wang1, Martin Torriani3. 1. Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, YAW 6048, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, YAW 6048, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. mtorriani@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically segment an axial CT image of the pelvis for body composition measures. We hypothesized that a deep CNN approach would achieve high accuracy when compared to manual segmentations as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We manually segmented 200 axial CT images at the supra-acetabular level in 200 subjects, labeling background, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), muscle, inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT), bone, and miscellaneous intra-pelvic content. The dataset was randomly divided into training (180/200) and test (20/200) datasets. Data augmentation was utilized to enlarge the training dataset and all images underwent preprocessing with histogram equalization. Our model was trained for 50 epochs using the U-Net architecture with batch size of 8, learning rate of 0.0001, Adadelta optimizer and a dropout of 0.20. The Dice (F1) score was used to assess similarity between the manual segmentations and the CNN predicted segmentations. RESULTS: The CNN model with data augmentation of N = 3000 achieved accurate segmentation of body composition for all classes. The Dice scores were as follows: background (1.00), miscellaneous intra-pelvic content (0.98), SAT (0.97), muscle (0.95), IMAT (0.91), and bone (0.92). Mean time to automatically segment one CT image was 0.07 s (GPU) and 2.51 s (CPU). CONCLUSIONS: Our CNN-based model enables accurate automated segmentation of multiple tissues on pelvic CT images, with promising implications for body composition studies.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically segment an axial CT image of the pelvis for body composition measures. We hypothesized that a deep CNN approach would achieve high accuracy when compared to manual segmentations as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We manually segmented 200 axial CT images at the supra-acetabular level in 200 subjects, labeling background, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), muscle, inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT), bone, and miscellaneous intra-pelvic content. The dataset was randomly divided into training (180/200) and test (20/200) datasets. Data augmentation was utilized to enlarge the training dataset and all images underwent preprocessing with histogram equalization. Our model was trained for 50 epochs using the U-Net architecture with batch size of 8, learning rate of 0.0001, Adadelta optimizer and a dropout of 0.20. The Dice (F1) score was used to assess similarity between the manual segmentations and the CNN predicted segmentations. RESULTS: The CNN model with data augmentation of N = 3000 achieved accurate segmentation of body composition for all classes. The Dice scores were as follows: background (1.00), miscellaneous intra-pelvic content (0.98), SAT (0.97), muscle (0.95), IMAT (0.91), and bone (0.92). Mean time to automatically segment one CT image was 0.07 s (GPU) and 2.51 s (CPU). CONCLUSIONS: Our CNN-based model enables accurate automated segmentation of multiple tissues on pelvic CT images, with promising implications for body composition studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body composition; Computed tomography; Deep learning; Muscle; Pelvis; Segmentation
Authors: Alexander D Weston; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Kenneth A Philbrick; Petro Kostandy; Tomas Sakinis; Motokazu Sugimoto; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Bret H Goodpaster; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Susan M Rubin; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Leroy Ten Dam; Anneke J van der Kooi; Fleur Rövekamp; Wim H J P Linssen; Marianne de Visser Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Ching-Di Chang; Jim S Wu; Jennifer Ni Mhuircheartaigh; Marry G Hochman; Edward K Rodriguez; Paul T Appleton; Colm J Mcmahon Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Iris J G Rutten; David P J van Dijk; Roy F P M Kruitwagen; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Steven W M Olde Damink; Toon van Gorp Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Aaroh M Parikh; Adriana M Coletta; Z Henry Yu; Gaiane M Rauch; Joey P Cheung; Laurence E Court; Ann H Klopp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ka'Toria Edwards; Avneesh Chhabra; James Dormer; Phillip Jones; Robert D Boutin; Leon Lenchik; Baowei Fei Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2020-02-28
Authors: Robin F Gohmann; Batuhan Temiz; Patrick Seitz; Sebastian Gottschling; Christian Lücke; Christian Krieghoff; Christian Blume; Matthias Horn; Matthias Gutberlet Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-10
Authors: Olivier Q Groot; Michiel E R Bongers; Colleen G Buckless; Peter K Twining; Neal D Kapoor; Stein J Janssen; Joseph H Schwab; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Xiaofan Xiong; Brian J Smith; Stephen A Graves; John J Sunderland; Michael M Graham; Brandie A Gross; John M Buatti; Reinhard R Beichel Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Kirti Magudia; Christopher P Bridge; Camden P Bay; Ana Babic; Florian J Fintelmann; Fabian M Troschel; Nityanand Miskin; William C Wrobel; Lauren K Brais; Katherine P Andriole; Brian M Wolpin; Michael H Rosenthal Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Leanne L G C Ackermans; Leroy Volmer; Leonard Wee; Ralph Brecheisen; Patricia Sánchez-González; Alexander P Seiffert; Enrique J Gómez; Andre Dekker; Jan A Ten Bosch; Steven M W Olde Damink; Taco J Blokhuis Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: J Peter Marquardt; Eric J Roeland; Emily E Van Seventer; Till D Best; Nora K Horick; Ryan D Nipp; Florian J Fintelmann Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Katherine M Bunnell; Tanayott Thaweethai; Colleen Buckless; Daniel J Shinnick; Martin Torriani; Andrea S Foulkes; Miriam A Bredella Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 5.095