PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the accuracy of water-saturation MRI and a computer segmentation program for quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on five patients with whole-volume coverage of the abdomen using two different sequences: 1) a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo breath-hold sequence (non-water-saturation) and 2) a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo water-saturation breath-hold sequence (water-saturation). The computer segmentation program analyzed the data and calculated VAT volumes (cm3) from both sequences. The data from one patient were additionally processed with the use of a manual technique. The intrastudy reproducibility of the proposed method using the water-saturation MRI sequence and the computer segmentation technique was tested by repeated measures of the automated system analysis (x 10) on MRI data from a single subject to calculate variability. RESULTS: VAT volumes measured by the water-saturation MRI sequences were consistently greater than those measured by the non-water-saturation sequences. Comparison of VAT volumes derived from the water-saturation images and measured by the computer segmentation technique vs. the manual technique showed good correlation (K = 0.8), with a significant time-saving benefit associated with the automated method (5 minutes vs. 1 hour). There was poor correlation between VAT volume measurement calculated by the manual technique and the computer segmentation technique using non-water-saturation images. The reproducibility of the computer segmentation technique using data derived from water-saturation images was high, with a low variability (+/- 5%). CONCLUSION: The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed method may be able to provide accurate quantification of VAT in a highly reproducible and efficient manner. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate the accuracy of water-saturation MRI and a computer segmentation program for quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on five patients with whole-volume coverage of the abdomen using two different sequences: 1) a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo breath-hold sequence (non-water-saturation) and 2) a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo water-saturation breath-hold sequence (water-saturation). The computer segmentation program analyzed the data and calculated VAT volumes (cm3) from both sequences. The data from one patient were additionally processed with the use of a manual technique. The intrastudy reproducibility of the proposed method using the water-saturation MRI sequence and the computer segmentation technique was tested by repeated measures of the automated system analysis (x 10) on MRI data from a single subject to calculate variability. RESULTS: VAT volumes measured by the water-saturation MRI sequences were consistently greater than those measured by the non-water-saturation sequences. Comparison of VAT volumes derived from the water-saturation images and measured by the computer segmentation technique vs. the manual technique showed good correlation (K = 0.8), with a significant time-saving benefit associated with the automated method (5 minutes vs. 1 hour). There was poor correlation between VAT volume measurement calculated by the manual technique and the computer segmentation technique using non-water-saturation images. The reproducibility of the computer segmentation technique using data derived from water-saturation images was high, with a low variability (+/- 5%). CONCLUSION: The results obtained demonstrate that the proposed method may be able to provide accurate quantification of VAT in a highly reproducible and efficient manner. Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Defeng Wang; Lin Shi; Winnie C W Chu; Miao Hu; Brian Tomlinson; Wen-Hua Huang; Tianfu Wang; Pheng Ann Heng; David K W Yeung; Anil T Ahuja Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Salam A Al-Attar; Rebecca L Pollex; John F Robinson; Brooke A Miskie; Rhonda Walcarius; Cynthia Harper Little; Brian K Rutt; Robert A Hegele Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: N Germain; B Galusca; D Caron-Dorval; J-F Martin; E Pujos-Guillot; Y Boirie; Y Khalfallah; Y Ling; J S Minnion; S R Bloom; J Epelbaum; B Estour Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 5.097
Authors: Nicolas Linder; Alexander Schaudinn; Nikita Garnov; Matthias Blüher; Arne Dietrich; Tatjana Schütz; Stefanie Lehmann; Ulf Retschlag; Thomas Karlas; Thomas Kahn; Harald Busse Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 4.379