Literature DB >> 22911921

Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies.

Diana Wald1, Birgit Teucher, Julien Dinkel, Rudolf Kaaks, Stefan Delorme, Heiner Boeing, Katharina Seidensaal, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Tobias Heimann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI-scanner with a 2-point Dixon whole-body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge-based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground-truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume.
RESULTS: Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients-of-variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%.
CONCLUSION: We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole-body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22911921     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  28 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative proton MR techniques for measuring fat.

Authors:  H H Hu; H E Kan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Development and evaluation of a method for segmentation of cardiac, subcutaneous, and visceral adipose tissue from Dixon magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jon D Klingensmith; Addison L Elliott; Amy H Givan; Zechariah D Faszold; Cory L Mahan; Adam M Doedtman; Maria Fernandez-Del-Valle
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-02-07

3.  Quantifying Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Thigh Muscle Volume and Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction: Repeatability and Accuracy of an MR Imaging-based, Semiautomated Analysis Method.

Authors:  Michael S Middleton; William Haufe; Jonathan Hooker; Magnus Borga; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Thobias Romu; Patrik Tunón; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Fat Quantification in the Abdomen.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12

5.  Test-retest reliability of automated whole body and compartmental muscle volume measurements on a wide bore 3T MR system.

Authors:  Marianna S Thomas; David Newman; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Bahman Kasmai; Richard Greenwood; Paul N Malcolm; Anette Karlsson; Johannes Rosander; Magnus Borga; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automated assessment of thigh composition using machine learning for Dixon magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Yu Xin Yang; Mei Sian Chong; Laura Tay; Suzanne Yew; Audrey Yeo; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Comparison of T1-weighted 2D TSE, 3D SPGR, and two-point 3D Dixon MRI for automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Faezeh Fallah; Jürgen Machann; Petros Martirosian; Fabian Bamberg; Fritz Schick; Bin Yang
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Prediction of Circulating Adipokine Levels Based on Body Fat Compartments and Adipose Tissue Gene Expression.

Authors:  Stefan Konigorski; Jürgen Janke; Dagmar Drogan; Manuela M Bergmann; Johannes Hierholzer; Rudolf Kaaks; Heiner Boeing; Tobias Pischon
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Can the use of blood-based biomarkers in addition to anthropometric indices substantially improve the prediction of visceral fat volume as measured by magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Jasmine Neamat-Allah; Theron Johnson; Diana Nabers; Anika Hüsing; Birgit Teucher; Verena Katzke; Stefan Delorme; Rudolf Kaaks; Tilman Kühn
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 10.  Segmentation and quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houchun Harry Hu; Jun Chen; Wei Shen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.