Literature DB >> 27025555

Accuracy of monitors used for blood pressure checks in English retail pharmacies: a cross-sectional observational study.

James Hodgkinson1, Constantinos Koshiaris2, Una Martin3, Jonathan Mant4, Carl Heneghan2, Fd Richard Hobbs2, Richard J McManus2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Free blood pressure (BP) checks offered by community pharmacies provide a potentially useful opportunity to diagnose and/or manage hypertension, but the accuracy of the sphygmomanometers in use is currently unknown. AIM: To assess the accuracy of validated automatic BP monitors used for BP checks in a UK retail pharmacy chain. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cross-sectional, observational study in 52 pharmacies from one chain in a range of locations (inner city, suburban, and rural) in central England.
METHOD: Monitor accuracy was compared with a calibrated reference device (Omron PA-350), at 50 mmHg intervals across the range 0-300 mmHg (static pressure test), with a difference from the reference monitor of +/- 3 mmHg at any interval considered a failure. The results were analysed by usage rates and length of time in service.
RESULTS: Of 61 BP monitors tested, eight (13%) monitors failed (that is, were >3 mmHg from reference), all of which underestimated BP. Monitor failure rate from the reference monitor of +/- 3 mmHg at any testing interval varied by length of time in use (2/38, 5% <18 months; 4/14, 29% >18 months, P = 0.038) and to some extent, but non-significantly, by usage rates (4/22, 18% in monitors used more than once daily; 2/33, 6% in those used less frequently, P = 0.204).
CONCLUSION: BP monitors within a pharmacy setting fail at similar rates to those in general practice. Annual calibration checks for blood pressure monitors are needed, even for new monitors, as these data indicate declining performance from 18 months onwards. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure monitors; calibration; community pharmacy services; hypertension; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025555      PMCID: PMC4838442          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X684769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  30 in total

1.  The accuracy of community-based automated blood pressure machines.

Authors:  D J Van Durme; M Goldstein; N Pal; R G Roetzheim; E C Gonzalez
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Neil Atkins; George Stergiou; Nikos Karpettas; Gianfranco Parati; Roland Asmar; Yutaka Imai; Jiguang Wang; Thomas Mengden; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Calibration accuracy of hospital-based non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices.

Authors:  A de Greeff; I Lorde; A Wilton; P Seed; A J Coleman; A H Shennan
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  A community-based evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure recorder.

Authors:  K Salaita; P K Whelton; A J Seidler
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.689

5.  Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Lewis; Eleanor Boyle; Lucy Magharious; Martin G Myers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Validation of the Lloyds pharmacy BP11 oscillometric blood pressure monitor according to the international protocol of the European society of hypertension.

Authors:  Andrew Coleman; Stephen Steel; Annemarie deGreeff; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  A physician-pharmacist model for the surveillance of blood pressure in the community: a feasibility study.

Authors:  K A Earle; P Taylor; S Wyatt; S Burnett; J Ray
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice.

Authors:  Andrea Botomino; Benedict Martina; Dominique Ruf; Rudolf Bruppacher; Kurt E Hersberger
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN).

Authors:  Donna L McLean; Finlay A McAlister; Jeffery A Johnson; Kathryn M King; Mark J Makowsky; Charlotte A Jones; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24

10.  Failure of the community-based Vita-Stat automated blood pressure device to accurately measure blood pressure.

Authors:  B L Whitcomb; A Prochazka; M LoVerde; R L Byyny
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1995-05
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Physician-pharmacist collaborative practice and telehealth may transform hypertension management.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Mauro Tenti; Claudio Coronetti
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Accuracy of blood-pressure monitors owned by patients with hypertension (ACCU-RATE study): a cross-sectional, observational study in central England.

Authors:  James A Hodgkinson; Mei-Man Lee; Siobhan Milner; Peter Bradburn; Richard Stevens; Fd Richard Hobbs; Constantinos Koshiaris; Sabrina Grant; Jonathan Mant; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Quality evaluation of community pharmacy blood pressure (BP) screening services: an English cross-sectional survey with geospatial analysis.

Authors:  Ravina Barrett; James Hodgkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Lancet Commission on Hypertension group position statement on the global improvement of accuracy standards for devices that measure blood pressure.

Authors:  James E Sharman; Eoin O'Brien; Bruce Alpert; Aletta E Schutte; Christian Delles; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland Asmar; Neil Atkins; Eduardo Barbosa; David Calhoun; Norm R C Campbell; John Chalmers; Ivor Benjamin; Garry Jennings; Stéphane Laurent; Pierre Boutouyrie; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Richard J McManus; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Pedro Ordunez; Raj Padwal; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Neil Poulter; Michael K Rakotz; Clive Rosendorff; Francesca Saladini; Angelo Scuteri; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Myeong-Chan Cho; Ki-Chul Sung; Raymond R Townsend; Ji-Guang Wang; Tine Willum Hansen; Gregory Wozniak; George Stergiou
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.776

5.  [Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group position statement on the global improvement of accuracy standards for devices that measure blood pressurePosicionamento do Grupo da Lancet Commission on Hypertension sobre a melhoria global dos padrões de acurácia para aparelhos que medem a pressão arterial].

Authors:  James E Sharman; Eoin O'Brien; Bruce Alpert; Aletta E Schutte; Christian Delles; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland Asmar; Neil Atkins; Eduardo Barbosa; David Calhoun; Norm R C Campbell; John Chalmers; Ivor Benjamin; Garry Jennings; Stéphane Laurent; Pierre Boutouyrie; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Richard J McManus; Anastasia S Mihailidou; Pedro Ordunez; Raj Padwal; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Neil Poulter; Michael K Rakotz; Clive Rosendorff; Francesca Saladini; Angelo Scuteri; Weimar Sebba Barroso; Myeong-Chan Cho; Ki-Chul Sung; Raymond R Townsend; Ji-Guang Wang; Tine Willum Hansen; Gregory Wozniak; George Stergiou
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2020-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.