Literature DB >> 26987599

High early event rates in patients with questionable eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies: Results from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Medamacs) Registry.

Amrut V Ambardekar1, Rhondalyn C Forde-McLean2, Michelle M Kittleson3, Garrick C Stewart4, Maryse Palardy5, Jennifer T Thibodeau6, Adam D DeVore7, Maria M Mountis8, Linda Cadaret9, Jeffrey J Teuteberg10, Salpy V Pamboukian11, Ryan S Cantor12, JoAnn Lindenfeld13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of ambulatory patients with advanced heart failure (HF) who are not yet inotrope dependent and implications for evaluation and timing for transplant or destination therapy with a left ventricular assist device (DT-LVAD) are unknown. We hypothesized that the characteristics defining eligibility for advanced HF therapies would be a primary determinant of outcomes in these patients.
METHODS: Ambulatory patients with advanced HF (New York Heart Association class III-IV, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles 4-7) were enrolled across 11 centers from May 2013 to February 2015. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: likely transplant eligible, DT-LVAD eligible, and ineligible for both transplant and DT-LVAD. Clinical characteristics were collected, and patients were prospectively followed for death, transplant, and left ventricular assist device implantation.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 144 patients with a mean follow-up of 10 ± 6 months. Patients in the ineligible cohort (n = 43) had worse congestion, renal function, and anemia compared with transplant (n = 51) and DT-LVAD (n = 50) eligible patients. Ineligible patients had higher mortality (23.3% vs 8.0% in DT-LVAD group and 5.9% in transplant group, p = 0.02). The differences in mortality were related to lower rates of transplantation (11.8% in transplant group vs 2.0% in DT-LVAD group and 0% in ineligible group, p = 0.02) and left ventricular assist device implantation (15.7% in transplant group vs 2.0% in DT-LVAD group and 0% in ineligible group, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory patients with advanced HF who were deemed ineligible for transplant and DT-LVAD had markers of greater HF severity and a higher rate of mortality compared with patients eligible for transplant or DT-LVAD. The high early event rate in this group emphasizes the need for timely evaluation and decision making regarding lifesaving therapies.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac transplantation; destination therapy; mechanical support; patient selection; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26987599      PMCID: PMC4917444          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  21 in total

1.  Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Francis D Pagani; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Elizabeth D Blume; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Crisis Awaiting Heart Transplantation: Sinking the Lifeboat.

Authors:  Lynne Warner Stevenson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: Results From the ROADMAP Study.

Authors:  Jerry D Estep; Randall C Starling; Douglas A Horstmanshof; Carmelo A Milano; Craig H Selzman; Keyur B Shah; Matthias Loebe; Nader Moazami; James W Long; Josef Stehlik; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Donald C Haas; John B O'Connell; Andrew J Boyle; David J Farrar; Joseph G Rogers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Frailty and the selection of patients for destination therapy left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kelsey M Flint; Daniel D Matlock; Joann Lindenfeld; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity.

Authors:  Jonathan Afilalo; Salvatore Mottillo; Mark J Eisenberg; Karen P Alexander; Nicolas Noiseux; Louis P Perrault; Jean-Francois Morin; Yves Langlois; Samuel M Ohayon; Johanne Monette; Jean-Francois Boivin; David M Shahian; Howard Bergman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-06

6.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

Authors:  L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Risk score model for predicting mortality in advanced heart failure patients followed in a heart failure clinic.

Authors:  Barak Zafrir; Yaron Goren; Hagar Paz; Rafael Wolff; Nabia Salman; Dina Merhavi; Idit Lavi; Basil S Lewis; Offer Amir
Journal:  Congest Heart Fail       Date:  2012-03-13

8.  Frailty and outcomes after implantation of left ventricular assist device as destination therapy.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Soon J Park; Lyle D Joyce; Richard C Daly; John M Stulak; Sheila M McNallan; Véronique L Roger; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Change in health-related quality of life from before to after destination therapy mechanical circulatory support is similar for older and younger patients: analyses from INTERMACS.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Mary Amanda Dew; Gerdi Weidner; John A Spertus; Katharine Idrissi; Hochang B Lee; Edwin C McGee; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Utility of the Seattle Heart Failure Model in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator referred for heart transplantation.

Authors:  Ulrik Sartipy; Ayumi Goda; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Donna M Mancini; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Defining Ambulatory Advanced Heart Failure: MedaMACS and Beyond.

Authors:  Garrick C Stewart; Amrut V Ambardekar; Michelle M Kittleson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-12

2.  Outcomes with ambulatory advanced heart failure from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (MedaMACS) Registry.

Authors:  Amrut V Ambardekar; Michelle M Kittleson; Maryse Palardy; Maria M Mountis; Rhondalyn C Forde-McLean; Adam D DeVore; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Linda Cadaret; Rongbing Xie; Wendy Taddei-Peters; David C Naftel; James K Kirklin; Lynne W Stevenson; Garrick C Stewart
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Discordant Perceptions of Prognosis and Treatment Options Between Physicians and Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Amrut V Ambardekar; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Adam D DeVore; Michelle M Kittleson; Rhondalyn C Forde-McLean; Maryse Palardy; Maria M Mountis; Linda Cadaret; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Salpy V Pamboukian; Rongbing Xie; Lynne W Stevenson; Garrick C Stewart
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 4.  Roads, Maps, and Destinations: the Journey of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Ambulatory Patients with Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Barry H Trachtenberg; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Identifying Stage D Heart Failure: Data From the Most Recent Registries.

Authors:  Thomas M Cascino; Keith D Aaronson; Garrick C Stewart
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-10

6.  An early relook identifies high-risk trajectories in ambulatory advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Michelle M Kittleson; Amrut V Ambardekar; Lynne W Stevenson; Nisha A Gilotra; Palak Shah; Gregory A Ewald; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Josef Stehlik; Maryse Palardy; Jerry D Estep; Thomas M Cascino; J Timothy Baldwin; Neal Jeffries; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Matheos Yosef; Wendy Taddei Peters; Blair Richards; Douglas L Mann; Keith D Aaronson; Garrick C Stewart
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  How long do patients with chronic disease expect to live? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Barnaby Hole; Joseph Salem
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Cardiac Surgery in Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Roger Hullin; Philippe Meyer; Patrick Yerly; Matthias Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Cost-effectiveness of a centrifugal-flow pump for patients with advanced heart failure in Argentina.

Authors:  Andrea Alcaraz; Andres Pichon-Riviere; Carlos Rojas-Roque; Juan Martín González; Daniela Prina; Germán Solioz; Federico Augustovski; Alfredo Palacios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Effectiveness of an Intervention Supporting Shared Decision Making for Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device: The DECIDE-LVAD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Larry A Allen; Colleen K McIlvennan; Jocelyn S Thompson; Shannon M Dunlay; Shane J LaRue; Eldrin F Lewis; Chetan B Patel; Laura Blue; Diane L Fairclough; Erin C Leister; Russell E Glasgow; Joseph C Cleveland; Clifford Phillips; Vicie Baldridge; Mary Norine Walsh; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.