Literature DB >> 22396586

Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity.

Jonathan Afilalo1, Salvatore Mottillo, Mark J Eisenberg, Karen P Alexander, Nicolas Noiseux, Louis P Perrault, Jean-Francois Morin, Yves Langlois, Samuel M Ohayon, Johanne Monette, Jean-Francois Boivin, David M Shahian, Howard Bergman.   

Abstract

Background- Cardiac surgery risk scores perform poorly in elderly patients, in part because they do not take into account frailty and disability which are critical determinants of health status with advanced age. There is an unmet need to combine established cardiac surgery risk scores with measures of frailty and disability to provide a more complete model for risk prediction in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods and Results- This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of elderly patients (≥70 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery in the United States and Canada. Four different frailty scales, 3 disability scales, and 5 cardiac surgery risk scores were measured in all patients. The primary outcome was the STS composite end point of in-hospital postoperative mortality or major morbidity. A total of 152 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 75.9±4.4 years and 34% women. Depending on the scale used, 20-46% of patients were found to be frail, and 5-76% were found to have at least 1 disability. The most predictive scale in each domain was: 5-meter gait speed ≥6 seconds as a measure of frailty (odds ratio [OR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-5.90), ≥3 impairments in the Nagi scale as a measure of disability (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.35-6.56) and either the Parsonnet score (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13) or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality or Major Morbidity (STS-PROMM) (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09) as a cardiac surgery risk score. Compared with the Parsonnet score or STS-PROMM alone, (area under the curve, 0.68-0.72), addition of frailty and disability provided incremental value and improved model discrimination (area under the curve, 0.73-0.76). Conclusions- Clinicians should use an integrative approach combining frailty, disability, and risk scores to better characterize elderly patients referred for cardiac surgery and identify those that are at increased risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22396586     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  90 in total

Review 1.  Emergent aortic surgery in octogenarians: is the advanced age a contraindication?

Authors:  Mario Castaño; Javier Gualis; Jose M Martínez-Comendador; Elio Martín; Pasquale Maiorano; Laura Castillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Karen P Alexander; Patrick T O'Gara; Jonathan Afilalo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study.

Authors:  Patrick Kierkegaard; Mira D Vale; Spencer Garrison; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Jason Owen-Smith
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Longitudinal relationship between onset of physical symptoms and functional impairment.

Authors:  Lisa M McAndrew; Drew A Helmer; Shou-En Lu; Helena K Chandler; Sarah Slotkin; Karen S Quigley
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-06-09

Review 5.  Frailty in cardiothoracic surgery: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

Review 6.  Frailty: Identifying elderly patients at high risk of poor outcomes.

Authors:  Linda Lee; George Heckman; Frank J Molnar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Promoting access to innovation for frail old persons. IAGG (International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics), WHO (World Health Organization) and SFGG (Société Française de Gériatrie et de Gérontologie) Workshop--Athens January 20-21, 2012.

Authors:  G Berrut; S Andrieu; I Araujo de Carvalho; J P Baeyens; H Bergman; B Cassim; F Cerreta; M Cesari; H B Cha; L K Chen; A Cherubini; M Y Chou; A J Cruz-Jentoft; L De Decker; P Du; B Forette; F Forette; A Franco; R Guimaraes; L M Guttierrez-Robledo; J Jauregui; V Khavinson; W J Lee; L N Peng; C Perret-Guillaume; M Petrovic; F Retornaz; K Rockwood; L Rodriguez-Manas; C Sieber; G Spatharakis; O Theou; E Topinkova; B Vellas; A Benetos
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Longitudinal functional recovery after geriatric cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Lillian Min; Lauren Mazzurco; Tanya R Gure; Christine T Cigolle; Pearl Lee; Cathie Bloem; Chiao-Li Chan; Matthew A Romano; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Kenneth M Langa; Richard L Prager; Preeti N Malani
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 9.  Perioperative cognitive protection.

Authors:  C Brown; S Deiner
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 10.  Frailty, Aging, and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Graham; Charles H Brown
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.