Literature DB >> 25578625

Change in health-related quality of life from before to after destination therapy mechanical circulatory support is similar for older and younger patients: analyses from INTERMACS.

Kathleen L Grady1, David C Naftel2, Susan Myers2, Mary Amanda Dew3, Gerdi Weidner4, John A Spertus5, Katharine Idrissi6, Hochang B Lee7, Edwin C McGee8, James K Kirklin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Destination therapy left ventricular assist devices (DT LVADs) are being implanted in older adults on an increasing basis. Older patients have a higher risk for mortality and morbidity post-LVAD, which may impact their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to determine the change in HRQOL by age from before implant to 1 year after DT LVAD implant and identify factors associated with the change.
METHODS: Data were collected from 1,470 continuous-flow DT LVAD patients at 108 institutions participating in INTERMACS from January 21, 2010 to March 31, 2012. Patients were divided into three cohorts: <60 years of age (n = 457); 60 to 69 years of age (n = 520); and ≥70 years of age (n = 493). HRQOL was measured using the generic EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D-3L). Data were collected pre-implant and 3, 6 and 12 months post-implant. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariable regression analyses.
RESULTS: HRQOL improved in all patients. Generally, older patients reported better HRQOL than younger patients pre-implant (≥70 years: mean 40; 60 to 69 years: mean 33; and <60 years: mean 31; p < 0.0001) and 1 year post-implant (≥70 years: mean 77; 60 to 69 years: mean 72; <60 years: mean 70; p = 0.01) using the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), with 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state. The magnitude of improvement in EQ-5D scores from pre-implant to 1-year post-LVAD implant was similar in all age groups (≥70 years: mean change 33; 60 to 69 years: mean change 35; <60 years: mean change 35; p = 0.77). Factors associated with improvement in HRQOL from before to 1 year after implant were a lower VAS score pre-implant and fewer rehospitalizations post-implant (R(2) = 61.3%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients reported better HRQOL than younger patients before and after LVAD implantation. The magnitude of improvement was similar for all age groups, with >70% of all patients showing clinically significant increases (>10 points on the VAS). Rehospitalization appears to reduce the magnitude of improvement.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; destination therapy; left ventricular assist devices; mechanical circulatory support; quality of life; ventricular assist devices

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25578625      PMCID: PMC4329289          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  35 in total

Review 1.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; Karen L Ulisney; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Quality of life one year after myocardial revascularization. Is preoperative quality of life important?

Authors:  Luc Noyez; Athanasios L P Markou; Fabiola C F van Breugel
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-01-10

4.  2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Mariell Jessup; William T Abraham; Donald E Casey; Arthur M Feldman; Gary S Francis; Theodore G Ganiats; Marvin A Konstam; Donna M Mancini; Peter S Rahko; Marc A Silver; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Clinical response of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the elderly.

Authors:  Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Henk Oude Luttikhuis; Arif Elvan; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Willem P Beukema; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: 29th official adult heart transplant report--2012.

Authors:  Josef Stehlik; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Jason D Christie; Anne I Dipchand; Fabienne Dobbels; Richard Kirk; Axel O Rahmel; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary.

Authors:  David Feldman; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Emma Birks; Katherine Lietz; Stephanie A Moore; Jeffrey A Morgan; Francisco Arabia; Mary E Bauman; Hoger W Buchholz; Mario Deng; Marc L Dickstein; Aly El-Banayosy; Tonya Elliot; Daniel J Goldstein; Kathleen L Grady; Kylie Jones; Katarzyna Hryniewicz; Ranjit John; Annemarie Kaan; Shimon Kusne; Matthias Loebe; M Patricia Massicotte; Nader Moazami; Paul Mohacsi; Martha Mooney; Thomas Nelson; Francis Pagani; William Perry; Evgenij V Potapov; J Eduardo Rame; Stuart D Russell; Erik N Sorensen; Benjamin Sun; Martin Strueber; Abeel A Mangi; Michael G Petty; Joseph Rogers
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire.

Authors:  H M van Agt; M L Essink-Bot; P F Krabbe; G J Bonsel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Age and outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation as bridge to transplantation.

Authors:  Sigrid E Sandner; Daniel Zimpfer; Philipp Zrunek; Angela Rajek; Heinrich Schima; Daniela Dunkler; Andreas O Zuckermann; Georg M Wieselthaler
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Implant Strategy-Specific Changes in Symptoms in Response to Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Jill M Gelow; Christopher V Chien; Shirin O Hiatt; Julie T Bidwell; Quin E Denfeld; Kathleen L Grady; James O Mudd
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Pain and Functional Status in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Himali Weerahandi; Nathan Goldstein; Laura P Gelfman; Ulrich Jorde; James N Kirkpatrick; Judith Marble; Yoshifumi Naka; Sean Pinney; Mark S Slaughter; Emilia Bagiella; Deborah D Ascheim
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  High early event rates in patients with questionable eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies: Results from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Medamacs) Registry.

Authors:  Amrut V Ambardekar; Rhondalyn C Forde-McLean; Michelle M Kittleson; Garrick C Stewart; Maryse Palardy; Jennifer T Thibodeau; Adam D DeVore; Maria M Mountis; Linda Cadaret; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Salpy V Pamboukian; Ryan S Cantor; JoAnn Lindenfeld
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Social Support Moderates the Relationship Between Perceived Stress and Quality of Life in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Martha Abshire; Stuart D Russell; Patricia M Davidson; Chakra Budhathoki; Hae-Ra Han; Kathleen L Grady; Shashank Desai; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Global Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Timothy J Fendler; Michael E Nassif; Kevin F Kennedy; Susan M Joseph; Scott C Silvestry; Gregory A Ewald; Shane J LaRue; Justin M Vader; John A Spertus; Suzanne V Arnold
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  A transapical-to-aorta double lumen cannula-based neonate left ventricular assist device efficiently unloads the left ventricle in neonate lambs.

Authors:  Cheng Zhou; Dongfang Wang; Cherry Ballard-Croft; Guangfeng Zhao; Hassan K Reda; Stephen Topaz; Joseph Zwischenberger
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Patients' decision making process and expectations of a left ventricular assist device pre and post implantation.

Authors:  Lisa A Kitko; Judith E Hupcey; Barbara Birriel; Windy Alonso
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  Age and gender differences and factors related to change in health-related quality of life from before to 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation: Findings from Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Annetine Gelijins; Alan Moskowitz; Francis D Pagani; James B Young; John A Spertus; James K Kirklin
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Causes and Consequences of Missing Health-Related Quality of Life Assessments in Patients Who Undergo Mechanical Circulatory Support Implantation: Insights From INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).

Authors:  Kathleen L Grady; Philip G Jones; Adin Cristian-Andrei; David C Naftel; Susan Myers; Mary Amanda Dew; Katharine Idrissi; Gerdi Weidner; Sherri A Wissman; James K Kirklin; John A Spertus
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.