Literature DB >> 24856259

Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.

James K Kirklin1, David C Naftel2, Francis D Pagani3, Robert L Kormos4, Lynne W Stevenson5, Elizabeth D Blume6, Marissa A Miller7, J T Baldwin7, J Timothy Baldwin7, James B Young8.   

Abstract

The sixth annual report of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) summarizes the first 8 years of patient enrollment. The analysis is based on data from >10,000 patients and updates demographics, survival, adverse events and risk factors. Among patients with continuous-flow pumps, actuarial survival continues to be 80% at 1 year and 70% at 2 years. The report features a comparison of two eras of continuous-flow durable devices in the USA in terms of device strategy, patient profiles, adverse event burden, survival and quality of life.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INTERMACS; advanced heart failure; destination therapy; mechanical support; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24856259     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  187 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic adjustments in stage D heart failure: challenges and strategies.

Authors:  Emer Joyce; Anju Nohria
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 2.  Epidemiology of "Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction": What do we do After Recovery?

Authors:  Johny S Kuttab; Michael S Kiernan; Amanda R Vest
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  [Total artificial heart].

Authors:  H Antretter; J Dumfarth; D Höfer
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  Towards destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Saito
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-19

Review 5.  The future of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  LaVone A Smith; Leora T Yarboro; Jamie L W Kennedy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Rapid Application Is Crucial.

Authors:  Felix Hennig; Evgenij V Potapov; Volkmar Falk; Thomas Krabatsch
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Perspectives from mechanical circulatory support coordinators on the pre-implantation decision process for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock; Madhav P Narayan; Carolyn Nowels; Jocelyn S Thompson; Anne Cannon; William J Bradley; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  Microfludic platforms for the evaluation of anti-platelet agent efficacy under hyper-shear conditions associated with ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Annalisa Dimasi; Marco Rasponi; Filippo Consolo; Gianfranco B Fiore; Danny Bluestein; Marvin J Slepian; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Preservation of native aortic valve flow and full hemodynamic support with the TORVAD using a computational model of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Gohean; Mitchell J George; Kay-Won Chang; Erik R Larson; Thomas D Pate; Mark Kurusz; Raul G Longoria; Richard W Smalling
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.