| Literature DB >> 26979333 |
Arthur Cho1,2, Jin Hur3, Yong Wha Moon4,5, Sae Rom Hong6, Young Joo Suh6, Yun Jung Kim6, Dong Jin Im6, Yoo Jin Hong6, Hye-Jeong Lee6, Young Jin Kim6, Hyo Sup Shim7, Jae Seok Lee7,8, Joo-Hang Kim4,5, Byoung Wook Choi6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: EGFR mutation-induced cell proliferation causes changes in tumor biology and tumor metabolism, which may reflect tumor marker concentration and 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT. Direct aspirates of primary lung tumors contain different concentrations of tumor markers than serum tumor markers, and may correlate better with EGFR mutation than serum tumor markers. The purpose of this study is to investigate an association between cytologic tumor markers and FDG uptake with EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG PET/CT; Cytologic CYFRA 21-1; Cytologic tumor marker; EGFR mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26979333 PMCID: PMC4793740 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2251-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Study design and patient selection algorithm
Patient characteristics
| Variable | Wild-type EGFR | EGFR mutation |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 63.1 ± 7.8 | 60.3 ± 11.8 | 0.282 |
| Gender (F:M) | 8:23 | 20:10 | 0.001a |
| Pathology (ADC:SCC:NOS) | 28:1:1 | 29:1:0 | 0.611 |
| Smoking status | 0.007a | ||
| Never smoker | 11 | 21 | |
| Current/former smoker | 20 | 9 | |
| TNM staging (1:2:3:4) | 8:7:5:11 | 7:4:5:14 | 0.746 |
| Tumor markers | |||
| s-CYFRA | 7.28 ± 20.28 | 2.50 ± 1.67 | 0.201 |
| s-CEA | 18.77 ± 46.91 | 34.61 ± 67.55 | 0.300 |
| s-SCCA | 1.00 ± 1.03 | 0.84 ± 0.89 | 0.507 |
| c-CYFRA | 85.18 ± 135.79 | 200.19 ± 208.84 | 0.014a |
| c-CEA | 21.60 ± 59.05 | 49.85 ± 110.04 | 0.214 |
| c-SCCA | 9.97 ± 35.36 | 5.70 ± 19.33 | 0.562 |
| SUVmax | 10.33 ± 5.82 | 7.01 ± 3.91 | 0.014a |
| Log(TLG) | 1.80 ± 0.65 | 1.35 ± 0.70 | 0.014a |
ADC adenocarcinoma, c-CEA cytologic carcinoembryonic antigen, c-CYFRA cytologic CYFRA 21-1, c-SCCA cytologic squamous cell carcinoma antigen, NOS non-small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, s-CEA serum carcinoembyonic antigen, s-CYFRA serum CYFRA 21-1, s-SCCA serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen, SUVmax maximum standard uptake value, log(TLG) natural logarithmic transformation of total lesion glycolysis
astatistically significant values of p < 0.05
Fig. 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of c-CYFRA level and FDG uptake (SUVmax) in predicting EGFR mutations. a ROC of c-CYFRA showed that a cut-off of 20.8 ng/ml had the highest sensitivity of 83.3 % (area under the ROC curve = 0.715, p = 0.001) in discriminating EGFR mutations from wild-type EGFR. b ROC of FDG uptake showed that a SUVmax cut-off of 9.6 had the highest sensitivity of 79.3 % in predicting EGFR mutations (area under the ROC curve = 0.68, p = 0.010)
Fig. 3Representative figures of differences in FDG uptake according to EGFR status. a A 55 yo female with 21 mm sized adenocarcinoma in the right lower lung superior segment. SUVmax was 2.2, and TLG was 4.0. b A 58 yo female with 20 mm sized adenocarcinoma in the left upper lung apical segment. SUVmax was 14.6, and TLG was 31.5
Multivariate analysis in the prediction of EGFR mutation
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95 % CI) |
| HR (95 % CI) |
| |
| Gender | 18.15 (1.44–228.73) | 0.025a | 39.69 (2.12–741.68) | 0.014a |
| Smoking status | 1.44 (0.16–13.24) | 0.749 | 1.58 (0.17–15.02) | 0.692 |
| c-CYFRAb | 7.58 (1.57–36.61) | 0.012a | 6.82 (0.03–0.77) | 0.023a |
| SUVmaxc | 12.97 (2.20–76.62) | 0.005a | ||
| Log(TLG)d | 24.15 (0–0.38) | 0.005a | ||
c-CYFRA cytologic CYFRA 21-1, HR hazard ratio, SUVmax maximum standard uptake value
astatistically significant values of p < 0.05
bc-CYFRA cut-off value: 20.8 ng/ml
cSUVmax cut-off value: 9.6
dLog(TLG) cut-off value: 1.64