Hyun Woo Chung1, Kye Young Lee, Hee Joung Kim, Wan Seop Kim, Young So. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Research Institute of Biomedical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea, hwchung@kuh.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT)-assessed metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) as prognostic factors in lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 106 patients (19 stage I/II and 87 stage III/IV lung adenocarcinoma) who underwent FDG PET/CT before treatment. Standardized uptake value (SUV), MTV, and TLG (MTV × mean SUV) of each malignant lesion were measured. Whole MTV and whole TLG were the summation of all the MTV and TLG values in each patient. Survival analysis and FDG PET/CT parameters regarding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation status were evaluated. RESULTS: Univariate survival analysis of stage III/IV patients identified high whole MTV (≥90), high whole TLG (≥600), and stage IV as significant predictors of poor progression-free survival. For overall survival, high whole MTV (≥90), high whole TLG (≥600), EGFR mutation-negative, and stage IV were significant poor prognostic predictors. After multivariate survival analysis, high whole MTV (P = 0.001), high whole TLG (P = 0.027), and stage IV (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of poor progression-free survival. High whole MTV (P < 0.001), high whole TLG (P = 0.001), and EGFR mutation-negative (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic predictors for poor overall survival. In a survival analysis of stage I/II patients, none was an independent prognostic predictor. No significant differences were found in FDG PET/CT parameters for EGFR mutation-negative and EGFR mutation-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of MTV and TLG by FDG PET/CT in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients provides useful information regarding prognosis.
PURPOSE: We investigated fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT)-assessed metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) as prognostic factors in lung adenocarcinomapatients. METHODS: This retrospective study included 106 patients (19 stage I/II and 87 stage III/IV lung adenocarcinoma) who underwent FDG PET/CT before treatment. Standardized uptake value (SUV), MTV, and TLG (MTV × mean SUV) of each malignant lesion were measured. Whole MTV and whole TLG were the summation of all the MTV and TLG values in each patient. Survival analysis and FDG PET/CT parameters regarding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation status were evaluated. RESULTS: Univariate survival analysis of stage III/IV patients identified high whole MTV (≥90), high whole TLG (≥600), and stage IV as significant predictors of poor progression-free survival. For overall survival, high whole MTV (≥90), high whole TLG (≥600), EGFR mutation-negative, and stage IV were significant poor prognostic predictors. After multivariate survival analysis, high whole MTV (P = 0.001), high whole TLG (P = 0.027), and stage IV (P = 0.006) were independent predictors of poor progression-free survival. High whole MTV (P < 0.001), high whole TLG (P = 0.001), and EGFR mutation-negative (P = 0.001) were independent prognostic predictors for poor overall survival. In a survival analysis of stage I/II patients, none was an independent prognostic predictor. No significant differences were found in FDG PET/CT parameters for EGFR mutation-negative and EGFR mutation-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of MTV and TLG by FDG PET/CT in advanced lung adenocarcinomapatients provides useful information regarding prognosis.
Authors: Remy Lim; Anne Eaton; Nancy Y Lee; Jeremy Setton; Nisha Ohri; Shyam Rao; Richard Wong; Matthew Fury; Heiko Schöder Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Chandrakanth Are; John F Hsu; Ronald A Ghossein; Heiko Schoder; Jatin P Shah; Ashok R Shaha Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Yulei Jiang; Bill C Penney; Daniel Appelbaum; Cassie A Simon; Ravi Salgia; Yonglin Pu Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Yonglin Pu; James X Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Daniel Appelbaum; Jianfeng Meng; Bill C Penney Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Romain-David Seban; John S Nemer; Aurélien Marabelle; Randy Yeh; Eric Deutsch; Samy Ammari; Antoine Moya-Plana; Fatima-Zohra Mokrane; Robyn D Gartrell; Grace Finkel; Luke Barker; Amélie E Bigorgne; Lawrence H Schwartz; Yvonne Saenger; Caroline Robert; Laurent Dercle Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Stephen S F Yip; John Kim; Thibaud P Coroller; Chintan Parmar; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Elizabeth Huynh; Raymond H Mak; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 10.057