Literature DB >> 20038723

Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib and docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer: data from the randomized phase III INTEREST trial.

Jean-Yves Douillard1, Frances A Shepherd, Vera Hirsh, Tony Mok, Mark A Socinski, Radj Gervais, Mei-Lin Liao, Helge Bischoff, Martin Reck, Mark V Sellers, Claire L Watkins, Georgina Speake, Alison A Armour, Edward S Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE In the phase III INTEREST trial, 1,466 pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib or docetaxel. As a preplanned analysis, we prospectively analyzed available tumor biopsies to investigate the relationship between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. METHODS Biomarkers included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization (374 assessable samples), EGFR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (n = 380), and EGFR (n = 297) and KRAS (n = 275) mutations. Results For all biomarker subgroups analyzed, survival was similar for gefitinib and docetaxel, with no statistically significant differences between treatments and no significant treatment by biomarker status interaction tests. EGFR mutation-positive patients had longer progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.49; P = .001) and higher objective response rate (ORR; 42.1% v 21.1%; P = .04), and patients with high EGFR copy number had higher ORR (13.0% v 7.4%; P = .04) with gefitinib versus docetaxel. CONCLUSION These biomarkers do not appear to be predictive factors for differential survival between gefitinib and docetaxel in this setting of previously treated patients; however, subsequent treatments may have influenced the survival results. For secondary end points of PFS and ORR, some advantages for gefitinib over docetaxel were seen in EGFR mutation-positive and high EGFR copy number patients. There was no statistically significant difference between gefitinib and docetaxel in biomarker-negative patients. This suggests gefitinib can provide similar overall survival to docetaxel in patients across a broad range of clinical subgroups and that EGFR biomarkers such as mutation status may additionally identify which patients are likely to gain greatest PFS and ORR benefit from gefitinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20038723     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.3030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  192 in total

1.  Integrating molecular diagnostics into anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  István Peták; Richárd Schwab; László Orfi; László Kopper; György Kéri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Clinical implementation of comprehensive strategies to characterize cancer genomes: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Laura E MacConaill; Paul Van Hummelen; Matthew Meyerson; William C Hahn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 3.  Importance of molecular features of non-small cell lung cancer for choice of treatment.

Authors:  Cesar Moran
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Perspective: The clinical trial barriers.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Elaine Lai-Han Leung; Xiaoying Tian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A phase II study of gefitinib for aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Bonnie S Glisson; Lei Feng; Fiona Wan; Ximing Tang; Ignacio I Wistuba; Adel K El-Naggar; David I Rosenthal; Mark S Chambers; Robert A Lustig; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer: make no assumptions.

Authors:  B Melosky
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Cancer: Clinical trials unite mice and humans.

Authors:  Leisa Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer--is it becoming a reality?

Authors:  Filip Janku; David J Stewart; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Molecular testing in lung cancer: the time is now.

Authors:  Haiying Cheng; Xunhai Xu; Daniel B Costa; Charles A Powell; Balazs Halmos
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Tumour molecular profiling for deciding therapy-the French initiative.

Authors:  Frédérique Nowak; Jean-Charles Soria; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.