OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. PARTICIPANTS: Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. EVIDENCE: Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). CONCLUSIONS: The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed. PARTICIPANTS: Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies. EVIDENCE: Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4). CONCLUSIONS: The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.
Authors: Lawrence J Jennings; Frederick A Smith; Kevin C Halling; Diane L Persons; Suzanne Kamel-Reid Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Tim Eisen; Renato Martins; Fredrick M Schnell; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Katherine Richardson; Frank Richardson; Bret Wacker; David W Sternberg; Jason Rusk; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Ross Camidge; D Ross Camidge Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marissa N Balak; Yixuan Gong; Gregory J Riely; Romel Somwar; Allan R Li; Maureen F Zakowski; Anne Chiang; Guangli Yang; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; William Pao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gaëtane C Michaud; Colleen L Channick; Chad R Marion; Robert M Tighe; James A Town; Andrew M Luks; Jeremy B Richards; Sucharita Kher; Prerna Mota; Gina Hong; Natalie E West; Craig Rackley; Luke Neilans; Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez; Hilary DuBrock; Cassie C Kennedy; Diana J Kelm; Carey C Thomson Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-09
Authors: S Vatrano; L Righi; T Vavalá; I Rapa; M Busso; S Izzo; S Cappia; A Veltri; M Papotti; G V Scagliotti; S Novello Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.493
Authors: William Whitney Robertson; Matthew A Steliga; Eric R Siegel; Konstantinos Arnaoutakis Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: James H Suh; Alexa B Schrock; Adrienne Johnson; Doron Lipson; Laurie M Gay; Shakti Ramkissoon; Jo-Anne Vergilio; Julia A Elvin; Abdur Shakir; Peter Ruehlman; Karen L Reckamp; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Siraj M Ali Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-03-14