Literature DB >> 21502181

Innovative reproductive technologies: risks and responsibilities.

W Dondorp1, G de Wert.   

Abstract

In view of the global burden of subfertility, efforts are required to make assisted reproduction more effective, less burdensome and more equally accessible. New reproductive technologies are frequently introduced in clinical practice without a sound evaluation of their efficacy, effectiveness and/or safety. Safety issues in this context refer both to patients (mostly women) undergoing the relevant medical procedures, and to the health of children born as a result. Responsible innovation requires making potentially risky reproductive technologies the subject of research, ideally proceeding through the steps of preclinical investigations, clinical trials and (long-term) follow-up studies. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology is especially equipped to take the lead here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502181     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  15 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer; Marie Louise Grøndahl; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Karen Sermon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Dynamics of reproductive genetic technologies: Perspectives of professional stakeholders.

Authors:  Ivy van Dijke; Carla G van El; Phillis Lakeman; Mariëtte Goddijn; Tessel Rigter; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges.

Authors:  Seppe Segers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Innovative treatment as a precursor to clinical research.

Authors:  David Wendler; Seher Anjum; Peter Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 19.456

Review 8.  Welfare in horse breeding.

Authors:  M L H Campbell; P Sandøe
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  The ethical challenges of the clinical introduction of mitochondrial replacement techniques.

Authors:  John B Appleby
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

10.  Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  Joyce C Harper; Joep Geraedts; Pascal Borry; Martina C Cornel; Wybo Dondorp; Luca Gianaroli; Gary Harton; Tanya Milachich; Helena Kääriäinen; Inge Liebaers; Michael Morris; Jorge Sequeiros; Karen Sermon; Françoise Shenfield; Heather Skirton; Sirpa Soini; Claudia Spits; Anna Veiga; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Stéphane Viville; Guido de Wert; Milan Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.