Literature DB >> 24456464

Ready to put metadata on the post-2015 development agenda? Linking data publications to responsible innovation and science diplomacy.

Vural Özdemir1, Eugene Kolker, Peter J Hotez, Sophie Mohin, Barbara Prainsack, Brian Wynne, Effy Vayena, Yavuz Coşkun, Türkay Dereli, Farah Huzair, Alexander Borda-Rodriguez, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Jack Faris, Raj Ramesar, Ambroise Wonkam, Collet Dandara, Bipin Nair, Adrián Llerena, Koray Kılıç, Rekha Jain, Panga Jaipal Reddy, Kishore Gollapalli, Sanjeeva Srivastava, Ilona Kickbusch.   

Abstract

Metadata refer to descriptions about data or as some put it, "data about data." Metadata capture what happens on the backstage of science, on the trajectory from study conception, design, funding, implementation, and analysis to reporting. Definitions of metadata vary, but they can include the context information surrounding the practice of science, or data generated as one uses a technology, including transactional information about the user. As the pursuit of knowledge broadens in the 21(st) century from traditional "science of whats" (data) to include "science of hows" (metadata), we analyze the ways in which metadata serve as a catalyst for responsible and open innovation, and by extension, science diplomacy. In 2015, the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) will formally come to an end. Therefore, we propose that metadata, as an ingredient of responsible innovation, can help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on the post-2015 agenda. Such responsible innovation, as a collective learning process, has become a key component, for example, of the European Union's 80 billion Euro Horizon 2020 R&D Program from 2014-2020. Looking ahead, OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, is launching an initiative for a multi-omics metadata checklist that is flexible yet comprehensive, and will enable more complete utilization of single and multi-omics data sets through data harmonization and greater visibility and accessibility. The generation of metadata that shed light on how omics research is carried out, by whom and under what circumstances, will create an "intervention space" for integration of science with its socio-technical context. This will go a long way to addressing responsible innovation for a fairer and more transparent society. If we believe in science, then such reflexive qualities and commitments attained by availability of omics metadata are preconditions for a robust and socially attuned science, which can then remain broadly respected, independent, and responsibly innovative. "In Sierra Leone, we have not too much electricity. The lights will come on once in a week, and the rest of the month, dark[ness]. So I made my own battery to power light in people's houses." Kelvin Doe (Global Minimum, 2012) MIT Visiting Young Innovator Cambridge, USA, and Sierra Leone "An important function of the (Global) R&D Observatory will be to provide support and training to build capacity in the collection and analysis of R&D flows, and how to link them to the product pipeline." World Health Organization (2013) Draft Working Paper on a Global Health R&D Observatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24456464     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2013.0170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  12 in total

Review 1.  Translating biotechnology to knowledge-based innovation, peace, and development? Deploy a Science Peace Corps--an open letter to world leaders.

Authors:  Nezih Hekim; Yavuz Coşkun; Ahmet Sınav; Alaa H Abou-Zeid; Mehmet Ağırbaşlı; Simisola O Akintola; Şükrü Aynacıoğlu; Mustafa Bayram; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Collet Dandara; Türkay Dereli; Edward S Dove; Levent Elbeyli; Laszlo Endrenyi; Kamile Erciyas; Jack Faris; Lynnette R Ferguson; Fahrettin Göğüş; Kıvanç Güngör; Mervi Gürsoy; Ulvi K Gürsoy; M Asım Karaömerlioğlu; Ilona Kickbusch; Türker Kılıç; Metin Kılınç; Tanıl Kocagöz; Biaoyang Lin; Adrián LLerena; Vangelis G Manolopoulos; Bipin Nair; Bülent Özkan; Tikki Pang; Şemra Sardaş; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Cengiz Toraman; Kemal Üstün; Louise Warnich; Ambroise Wonkam; Mustafa Cengiz Yakıcıer; Ümit Yaşar; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-06-23

2.  A call for pharmacogenovigilance and rapid falsification in the age of big data: why not first road test your biomarker?

Authors:  Semra Şardaş; Laszlo Endrenyi; Ulvi K Gürsoy; Mara Hutz; Biaoyang Lin; George P Patrinos; Lotte M G Steuten; Wei Wang; Louise Warnich; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-10-29

3.  Metadata checklist: identification of CHI3L1 and MASP2 as a biomarker pair for liver cancer through integrative secretome and transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Wenchao Ding; Qingchong Qiu; Guanfeng Liu; Jie Liu; Ruifang Mao; Biaoyang Lin
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-08-18

4.  Bernard Lerer: recipient of the 2014 inaugural Werner Kalow Responsible Innovation Prize in Global Omics and Personalized Medicine (Pacific Rim Association for Clinical Pharmacogenetics).

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Laszlo Endrenyi; Sükrü Aynacıoğlu; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Collet Dandara; Edward S Dove; Lynnette R Ferguson; Christy Jo Geraci; Ernst Hafen; Belgin Eroğlu Kesim; Eugene Kolker; Edmund J D Lee; Adrian Llerena; Muradiye Nacak; Kazutaka Shimoda; Toshiyuki Someya; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Brian Tomlinson; Effy Vayena; Louise Warnich; Umit Yaşar
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2016 Update.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Francesco Oliva; Antonio Frizziero; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

6.  A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.

Authors:  Barbara E Ribeiro; Robert D J Smith; Kate Millar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Evaluation of Nine Consensus Indices in Delphi Foresight Research and Their Dependency on Delphi Survey Characteristics: A Simulation Study and Debate on Delphi Design and Interpretation.

Authors:  Stanislav Birko; Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Akram Alyass; Michelle Turcotte; David Meyre
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  A Delphi Technology Foresight Study: Mapping Social Construction of Scientific Evidence on Metagenomics Tests for Water Safety.

Authors:  Stanislav Birko; Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  What Role for Law, Human Rights, and Bioethics in an Age of Big Data, Consortia Science, and Consortia Ethics? The Importance of Trustworthiness.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Vural Özdemir
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.