Literature DB >> 26951494

Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.

Alexey A Smetkin1,2,3, Ayyaz Hussain4, Evgenia V Fot4,5, Viktor I Zakharov4, Natalia N Izotova4, Angelika S Yudina4, Zinaida A Dityateva4, Yanina V Gromova4, Vsevolod V Kuzkov4,5, Lars J Bjertnæs6, Mikhail Y Kirov4,5,6.   

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) based on pulse wave transit time in comparison with cardiac output (CO) assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). We calibrated the esCCO system with non-invasive (Part 1) and invasive (Part 2) blood pressure and compared with TPTD measurements. We performed parallel measurements of CO with both techniques and assessed the accuracy and precision of individual CO values and agreement of trends of changes perioperatively (Part 1) and postoperatively (Part 2). A Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias between non-invasive esCCO and TPTD of 0.9 L/min and limits of agreement of ±2.8 L/min. Intraoperative bias was 1.2 L/min with limits of agreement of ±2.9 L/min and percentage error (PE) of 64 %. Postoperatively, bias was 0.4 L/min, limits of agreement of ±2.3 L/min and PE of 41 %. A Bland-Altman analysis of invasive esCCO and TPTD after OPCAB found bias of 0.3 L/min with limits of agreement of ±2.1 L/min and PE of 40 %. A 4-quadrant plot analysis of non-invasive esCCO versus TPTD revealed overall, intraoperative and postoperative concordance rate of 76, 65, and 89 %, respectively. The analysis of trending ability of invasive esCCO after OPCAB revealed concordance rate of 73 %. During OPCAB, esCCO demonstrated poor accuracy, precision and trending ability compared to TPTD. Postoperatively, non-invasive esCCO showed better agreement with TPTD. However, invasive calibration of esCCO did not improve the accuracy and precision and the trending ability of method.

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Estimated continuous cardiac output; Hemodynamics; Intraoperative monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26951494     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9853-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  37 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Accuracy of noninvasive estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) compared to thermodilution cardiac output: a pilot study in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Timothy R Ball; Anthony P Tricinella; B Alex Kimbrough; Sarah Luna; David F Gloyna; Frank J Villamaria; William C Culp
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J Mayer; J Boldt; T Schöllhorn; K D Röhm; A M Mengistu; S Suttner
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Tracking Changes in Cardiac Output: Statistical Considerations on the 4-Quadrant Plot and the Polar Plot Methodology.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Oliver Grothe; Julia Y Wagner
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac output during volume expansion in the perioperative period?

Authors:  Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Jean-Pierre Goarin; Benoît Tavernier; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care.

Authors:  B Bataille; M Bertuit; M Mora; M Mazerolles; P Cocquet; B Masson; P E Moussot; J Ginot; S Silva; J Larché
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A A Smetkin; A Hussain; V V Kuzkov; L J Bjertnæs; M Y Kirov
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton; Simon W Chong
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Non-invasive estimated continuous cardiac output (escCO) during severe sepsis and septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Chairat Permpikul; Thongchai Leelayuthachai
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2014-03

Review 10.  Role of arterial stiffness in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Marina Cecelja; Phil Chowienczyk
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-07-31
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui; M Higashi; I Schmidtmann; C Werner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Continuous Estimation of Cardiac Output in Critical Care: A Noninvasive Method Based on Pulse Wave Transit Time Compared with Transpulmonary Thermodilution.

Authors:  Ulrike Ehlers; Rolf Erlebach; Giovanna Brandi; Federica Stretti; Richard Valek; Stephanie Klinzing; Reto Schuepbach
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Pilot Study: Estimation of Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output from Pulse Wave Velocity.

Authors:  Yurie Obata; Maki Mizogami; Daniel Nyhan; Dan E Berkowitz; Jochen Steppan; Viachaslau Barodka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of pulse wave transit time analysis for non-invasive cardiac output quantification in pregnant patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel Schneck; Pascal Drubel; Rainer Schürg; Melanie Markmann; Thomas Kohl; Michael Henrich; Michael Sander; Christian Koch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Invasive and noninvasive cardiovascular monitoring options for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dominic P Recco; Nathalie Roy; Alexander J Gregory; Kevin W Lobdell
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.