Jing Hao1, Lin Li2, Fang Tian3, Hong Zhang3. 1. Department of Cataract, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, China; North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China. 2. Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan 063000, HeBei, China. 3. Department of Cataract, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, China.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations. METHODS: KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea.
AIM: To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations. METHODS: KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea.
Entities:
Keywords:
KR-1W; agreement; difference; high order aberration; iTrace
Authors: Lucyna Moćko; Marek Zajac; Anna M Roszkowska; Beata Weglarz; Michał Milka; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Edward Wylegała Journal: Klin Oczna Date: 2012
Authors: Seyhan Yazar; Alex W Hewitt; Hannah Forward; Charlotte M McKnight; Alex Tan; Jenny A Mountain; David A Mackey Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Marcony R Santhiago; Marcelo V Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz A F Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Francisco de Asís Bartol-Puyal; Galadriel Giménez; Silvia Méndez-Martínez; Irene Altemir; José Manuel Larrosa; Vicente Polo; Luis Pablo Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; David P Piñero Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Francisco D A Bartol-Puyal; Galadriel Giménez; Irene Altemir; José M Larrosa; Vicente Polo; Luis Pablo Journal: Saudi J Ophthalmol Date: 2022-02-18