Literature DB >> 26949622

Efficacy and economic analysis of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Ling Wang1, Fang Sha2, Da-Dong Guo3, Hong-Sheng Bi2, Jun-Kang Si4, Yu-Xiang Du4, Kai Tang2.   

Abstract

AIM: To systematically review the current evidence based on the efficacy and cost of Ex-PRESS implantation and trabeculectomy (Trab) for uncontrolled glaucoma.
METHODS: Clinical trials were identified by electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of science and Cochrane library), and data, such as intraocular pressure (IOP), the complete and qualified success rate, the postoperative complications and the cost, were exacted from these relevant studies. Weighted mean difference (WMD), odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and were pooled using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: Eleven relevant publications and two abstracts met the inclusion criteria. The efficacy of Ex-PRESS was similar to that of Trab in the percentage of IOP reduction (IOPR %) at 1, 2y (WMD: -2.01; 95% CI: -7.92-3.90; P=0.50 and WMD: 2.89; 95% CI: -8.05-13.83; P=0.60, respectively). Ex-PRESS possessed a significant higher complete and qualified success rate (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.07-2.35; P=0.02 and OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.06-2.86; P=0.03, respectively). Moreover, Ex-PRESS exerted a significantly lower frequency of hypotony and hyphema than Trab (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.72; P=0.003 and OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.10-0.69; P=0.003, respectively). However, there was no consistent result on the cost between the two groups according to the previous three studies.
CONCLUSION: Both Trab and Ex-PRESS have equivalent efficacy in lowering IOP, yet Ex-PRESS had a lower risk of hypotony and hyphema than Trab. Nevertheless, whether the cost of Ex-PRESS was less than that of Trab should be further investigated to ensure evidence-based conclusion in the long run.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ex-PRESS implantation; Meta-analysis; systematic review; trabeculectomy; uncontrolled glaucoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 26949622      PMCID: PMC4768498          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.01.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of the Ex-PRESS™ mini glaucoma shunt with standard trabeculectomy in the surgical treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Lionel Marzette; Leon W Herndon
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  Comparison of trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under scleral flap.

Authors:  Peter J G Maris; Kyoko Ishida; Peter A Netland
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study).

Authors:  Peter A Netland; Steven R Sarkisian; Marlene R Moster; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed; Garry Condon; Sarwat Salim; Mark B Sherwood; Carla J Siegfried
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Comparison of trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS implantation in fellow eyes of the same patient: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  E Dahan; G J Ben Simon; A Lafuma
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Mini-drainage devices: the Ex-PRESS Mini-Glaucoma Device.

Authors:  J Matthew Rouse; Steven R Sarkisian
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-17

8.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Ex-PRESS to Trabeculectomy: 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Lilach D Wagschal; Graham E Trope; Delan Jinapriya; Ya-Ping Jin; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The first report on intermediate-term outcome of Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device implanted under scleral flap in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sugiyama; Maho Shibata; Shota Kojima; Mari Ueki; Tsunehiko Ikeda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-29
View more
  2 in total

1.  Ex-PRESS® surgery versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma with low preoperative intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Mitsuya Otsuka; Atsushi Hayashi; Naoki Tojo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Long-Term Changes in Corneal Endothelial Cell Density after Ex-PRESS Implantation: A Contralateral Eye Study.

Authors:  Xiaotong Ren; Jie Wang; Xuemin Li; Lingling Wu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.