Literature DB >> 24210765

Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study).

Peter A Netland1, Steven R Sarkisian2, Marlene R Moster3, Iqbal Ike K Ahmed4, Garry Condon5, Sarwat Salim6, Mark B Sherwood7, Carla J Siegfried8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device placed under a partial-thickness scleral flap with trabeculectomy.
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, multicenter trial.
METHODS: A total of 120 eyes in 120 subjects were analyzed, including 59 eyes treated with EX-PRESS and 61 eyes treated with trabeculectomy. Both the EX-PRESS and the trabeculectomy groups were treated intraoperatively with mitomycin C and followed postoperatively for 2 years. Surgical success was defined as 5 mm Hg ≤ intraocular pressure ≤ 18 mm Hg, with or without medications, without further glaucoma surgery.
RESULTS: Mean intraocular pressure was significantly reduced compared with baseline in both groups (P < 0.001). Average intraocular pressure and number of medications were similar in both groups during follow-up, with mean intraocular pressure at 2 years after surgery of 14.7 ± 4.6 mm Hg and 14.6 ± 7.1 mm Hg in the EX-PRESS and trabeculectomy groups, respectively (P = 0.927). At 2 years after surgery, the success rate was 83% and 79% in the EX-PRESS and trabeculectomy groups, respectively (P = 0.563). Although visual acuity (logMAR) was significantly decreased on day 1 in both groups, the vision was not significantly different compared with baseline at 1 month after EX-PRESS implant (P = 0.285) and 3 months after trabeculectomy (P = 0.255). The variance of early postoperative intraocular pressure values was similar between groups on the first postoperative day but higher after trabeculectomy compared with EX-PRESS implant on day 7 (P = 0.003). The total number of postoperative complications was higher after trabeculectomy than after EX-PRESS implantation (P = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Mean intraocular pressures, medication use, and surgical success were similar at 2 years after treatment with the EX-PRESS device and trabeculectomy. Vision recovery between groups was also similar throughout the study, although return to baseline vision was more rapid in the EX-PRESS group. Intraocular pressure variation was lower during the early postoperative period, and postoperative complications were less common after EX-PRESS implantation compared with trabeculectomy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24210765     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  40 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Ex-PRESS(®) P-50 implant under scleral flap in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Valentín Huerva; Jordi Soldevila; Francisco J Ascaso; Laura Lavilla; M Jesús Muniesa; M Carmen Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Visual acuity and corneal higher-order aberrations after EX-PRESS or trabeculectomy, and the determination of associated factors that influence visual function.

Authors:  Nobuko Kobayashi; Kazuyuki Hirooka; Eri Nitta; Kaori Ukegawa; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in Chinese patients with POAG: fellow eye pilot study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Min-Wen Zhou; Wen-Bin Huang; Xin-Bo Gao; Xiu-Lan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Effect of glaucoma implant surgery on intraocular pressure reduction, flare count, anterior chamber depth, and corneal endothelium in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Kyoko Ishida; Naoya Moroto; Kazuhiro Murata; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Modified deep sclerectomy combined with Ex-PRESS filtration device versus trabeculectomy for primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Vassilios Kozobolis; Georgios D Panos; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Miguel Teus; Georgios Labiris
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Risk factors for Ex-Press® surgery failure.

Authors:  Mitsuya Otsuka; Naoki Tojo; Atsushi Hayashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.029

7.  Ex-PRESS® surgery versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma with low preoperative intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Mitsuya Otsuka; Atsushi Hayashi; Naoki Tojo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.029

8.  Efficacy and economic analysis of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Fang Sha; Da-Dong Guo; Hong-Sheng Bi; Jun-Kang Si; Yu-Xiang Du; Kai Tang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Glaucoma in Exfoliation Syndrome.

Authors:  Mohamed S Sayed; Richard K Lee
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Rabeea Khan; Anne Coleman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.