Literature DB >> 26949100

Effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc and its effect on vertebral bone stress.

Haisheng Yang1, Michael G Jekir2, Maxwell W Davis2, Tony M Keaveny3.   

Abstract

The mechanism of vertebral wedge fractures remains unclear and may relate to typical variations in the mechanical behavior of the intervertebral disc. To gain insight, we tested 16 individual whole discs (between levels T8 and L5) from nine cadavers (mean±SD: 66±16 years), loaded in compression at different rates (0.05-20.0% strain/s), to measure a homogenized "effective" linear elastic modulus of the entire disc. The measured effective modulus, and average disc height, were then input and varied parametrically in micro-CT-based finite element models (60-μm element size, up to 80 million elements each) of six T9 human vertebrae that were virtually loaded to 3° of moderate forward-flexion via a homogenized disc. Across all specimens and loading rates, the measured effective modulus of the disc ranged from 5.8 to 42.7MPa and was significantly higher for higher rates of loading (p<0.002); average disc height ranged from 2.9 to 9.3mm. The parametric finite element analysis indicated that, as disc modulus increased and disc height decreased across these ranges, the vertebral bone stresses increased but their spatial distribution was largely unchanged: most of the highest stresses occurred in the central trabecular bone and endplates, and not anteriorly. Taken together with the literature, our findings suggest that the effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc should rarely exceed 100MPa and that typical variations in disc effective modulus (and less so, height) minimally influence the spatial distribution but can appreciably influence the magnitude of stress within the vertebral body.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone strength; Finite element analysis; Intervertebral disc; Osteoporosis; Wedge fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26949100      PMCID: PMC4851573          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  51 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling.

Authors:  P Dolan; M A Adams
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Time-dependent compressive deformation of the ageing spine: relevance to spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Phillip Pollintine; Manon S L M van Tunen; Jin Luo; Matthew D Brown; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Introduction: disc degeneration: summary.

Authors:  Howard S An; Paul A Anderson; Victor M Haughton; James C Iatridis; James D Kang; Jeffrey C Lotz; Raghu N Natarajan; Theodore R Oegema; Peter Roughley; Lori A Setton; Jill P Urban; Tapio Videman; Gunnar B J Andersson; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. I. Creep analysis during static compressive loading.

Authors:  T S Keller; D M Spengler; T H Hansson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models.

Authors:  B van Rietbergen; H Weinans; R Huiskes; A Odgaard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Association of lumbar disc degeneration with osteoporotic fractures; the Rotterdam study and meta-analysis from systematic review.

Authors:  M C Castaño-Betancourt; L Oei; F Rivadeneira; E I T de Schepper; A Hofman; S Bierma-Zeinstra; H A P Pols; A G Uitterlinden; J B J Van Meurs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Grant Bevill; Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Vertebral fractures usually affect the cranial endplate because it is thinner and supported by less-dense trabecular bone.

Authors:  F-D Zhao; P Pollintine; B D Hole; M A Adams; P Dolan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Calvin C Kuo; Liu C Cheng; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway; Craig Slyfield; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Toward an artificial intelligence-assisted framework for reconstructing the digital twin of vertebra and predicting its fracture response.

Authors:  Hossein Ahmadian; Prasath Mageswaran; Benjamin A Walter; Dukagjin M Blakaj; Eric C Bourekas; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras; Soheil Soghrati
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.648

3.  Assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from body scanner image by finite element simulations.

Authors:  Alexander T D Grünwald; Susmita Roy; Ana Alves-Pinto; Renée Lampe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The importance of curve severity, type and instrumentation strategy in the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an in silico clinical trial on 64 cases.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Cina; Matteo Panico; Tito Bassani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development and validation of a timely and representative finite element human spine model for biomechanical simulations.

Authors:  Ibrahim El Bojairami; Khaled El-Monajjed; Mark Driscoll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of endplate healing morphology on intervertebral disc degeneration after pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Yunshan Su; Dong Ren; Dehang Liu; Junfei Li; Tianci Wang; Wei Qi; Yunpeng Wang; Yufeng Chen; Pengcheng Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Computational modeling of posteroanterior lumbar traction by an automated massage bed: predicting intervertebral disc stresses and deformation.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Niranjan Khadka; Jacek P Dmochowski; Edson Meneses; Kiwon Lee; Sungjin Kim; Youngsoo Jin; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Alejandro Alonso-Calleja; Alexander Kelly; Cambre Kelly; Ken Gall; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Load-transfer in the human vertebral body following lumbar total disc arthroplasty: Effects of implant size and stiffness in axial compression and forward flexion.

Authors:  Noah B Bonnheim; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-01-19

10.  Effect of Strain Rates on Failure of Mechanical Properties of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Under Flexion.

Authors:  Kun Li; Shi-Jie Zhang; Cheng-Fei Du; Ji-Zhe Zhao; Qing Liu; Chun-Qiu Zhang; Yan-Fang Sun
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.