Literature DB >> 32418348

3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.

Bijan Abar1, Alejandro Alonso-Calleja2, Alexander Kelly1, Cambre Kelly1, Ken Gall1, Jennifer L West2.   

Abstract

Despite advances in biomaterials research, there is no ideal device for replacing weight-bearing soft tissues like menisci or intervertebral discs due to poor integration with tissues and mechanical property mismatch. Designing an implant with a soft and porous tissue-contacting structure using a material conducive to cell attachment and growth could potentially address these limitations. Polycarbonate urethane (PCU) is a soft and tough biocompatible material that can be 3D printed into porous structures with controlled pore sizes. Porous biomaterials of appropriate chemistries can support cell proliferation and tissue ingrowth, but their optimal design parameters remain unclear. To investigate this, porous PCU structures were 3D-printed in a crosshatch pattern with a range of in-plane pore sizes (0 to 800 μm) forming fully interconnected porous networks. Printed porous structures had ultimate tensile strengths ranging from 1.9 to 11.6 MPa, strains to failure ranging from 300 to 486%, Young's moduli ranging from 0.85 to 12.42 MPa, and porosity ranging from 13 to 71%. These porous networks can be loaded with hydrogels, such as collagen gels, to provide additional biological support for cells. Bare PCU structures and collagen-hydrogel-filled porous PCU support robust NIH/3T3 fibroblast cell line proliferation over 14 days for all pore sizes. Results highlight PCU's potential in the development of tissue-integrating medical implants.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; collagen; hydrogel; polycarbonate urethane; porous

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32418348      PMCID: PMC7669538          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  36 in total

1.  Study of gelatin-containing artificial skin V: fabrication of gelatin scaffolds using a salt-leaching method.

Authors:  Sang Bong Lee; Yong Han Kim; Moo Sang Chong; Seung Hwa Hong; Young Moo Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations.

Authors:  B P Chan; K W Leong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Scott Seaman; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Mohamad Bydon; James C Torner; Patrick W Hitchon
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Evaluation of the wear performance of a polycarbonate-urethane acetabular component in a hip joint simulator and comparison with UHMWPE and cross-linked UHMWPE.

Authors:  Kenneth St John; Minakshi Gupta
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  A novel synthetic material for spinal fusion: a prospective clinical trial of porous bioactive titanium metal for lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Masashi Neo; Tomiharu Matsushita; Tadashi Kokubo; Kenji Doi; Tatsuya Ito; Akira Shimizu; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc and its effect on vertebral bone stress.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Michael G Jekir; Maxwell W Davis; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Polymers in Cartilage Defect Repair of the Knee: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ralph M Jeuken; Alex K Roth; Ruud J R W Peters; Corrinus C Van Donkelaar; Jens C Thies; Lodewijk W Van Rhijn; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 8.  Methods to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Low Quality (Type-IV) Bone: An Overview.

Authors:  Hamdan S Alghamdi
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-01-13

9.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  3D Printing of Porous Scaffolds with Controlled Porosity and Pore Size Values.

Authors:  Irene Buj-Corral; Ali Bagheri; Oriol Petit-Rojo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Meniscus regeneration by 3D printing technologies: Current advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Elena Stocco; Andrea Porzionato; Enrico De Rose; Silvia Barbon; Raffaele De Caro; Veronica Macchi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.813

2.  Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Nicholas Kwon; Nicholas B Allen; Trent Lau; Lindsey G Johnson; Ken Gall; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  The triply periodic minimal surface-based 3D printed engineering scaffold for meniscus function reconstruction.

Authors:  Lan Li; Peng Wang; Jing Jin; Chunmei Xie; Bin Xue; Jiancheng Lai; Liya Zhu; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2022-09-17

Review 4.  Meniscal Regenerative Scaffolds Based on Biopolymers and Polymers: Recent Status and Applications.

Authors:  Hao Li; Pinxue Li; Zhen Yang; Cangjian Gao; Liwei Fu; Zhiyao Liao; Tianyuan Zhao; Fuyang Cao; Wei Chen; Yu Peng; Zhiguo Yuan; Xiang Sui; Shuyun Liu; Quanyi Guo
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-13

5.  Deposition of Biocompatible Polymers by 3D Printing (FDM) on Titanium Alloy.

Authors:  Dominika Grygier; Maciej Kujawa; Piotr Kowalewski
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 6.  Cytoskeletal prestress: The cellular hallmark in mechanobiology and mechanomedicine.

Authors:  Farhan Chowdhury; Bo Huang; Ning Wang
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.