Literature DB >> 11275338

Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling.

P Dolan1, M A Adams.   

Abstract

Mathematical models are often used to quantify the overall forces and moments acting on the lumbar spine. However, if the purpose of the research is to explain how spinal tissues can be injured, it is necessary to distribute the overall forces and moments between (and within) different spinal structures, because it is the concentration of force which causes injury, and elicits pain. This paper reviews recent experimental evidence concerning the distribution of forces and moments acting on the lumbar spine. Lordotic postures increase loading of the posterior annulus and apophyseal joints, whereas moderately flexed postures tend to equalise compressive stress across the disc, and unload the apophyseal joints. Sustained compression reduces the volume and pressure of the nucleus pulposus, while increasing compressive stresses in the annulus and neural arch. Sustained compression also reduces disc height, giving some slack to collagen fibres in the intervertebral disc and ligaments, and causing them to resist bending less. Disc degeneration has a similar effect on disc height, and stress distributions. On the other hand, discs and ligaments can be subjected to greater bending moments following a period of sustained or repetitive bending, because sustained bending impairs the normal protective reflex from the back muscles, and repetitive bending fatigues the back muscles, reducing their ability to protect the spine. Incorporating this information into mathematical models will make them better able to identify which activities are most likely to injure the lumbar spine in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11275338     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00096-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  12 in total

1.  The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry.

Authors:  Daniel M Skrzypiec; Phillip Pollintine; Andrzej Przybyla; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Snapshot of degenerative aging of porcine intervertebral disc: a model to unravel the molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Hongsik Cho; Sang Hyug Park; Sangmin Lee; Miji Kang; Karen A Hasty; Song Ja Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.718

Review 3.  Mechanical loading of the intervertebral disc: from the macroscopic to the cellular level.

Authors:  Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Fabio Galbusera; Harris Pratsinis; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Antje Mietsch; Dimitris Kletsas; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal balance measures are more reproducible when measured in 3D vs in 2D using full-body EOS® images.

Authors:  Masashi Okamoto; Fouad Jabour; Kenichiro Sakai; Shun Hatsushikano; J C Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Restoration of spinal alignment and disk mechanics following polyetheretherketone wafer kyphoplasty with StaXx FX.

Authors:  S M Renner; P P Tsitsopoulos; A T Dimitriadis; L I Voronov; R M Havey; G Carandang; B McIntosh; C Carson; D Ty; J G Ringelstein; A G Patwardhan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  INVESTIGATION OF OPTIMAL LUMBAR SPINE POSTURE DURING A SIMULATED LANDING TASK IN ELITE GYMNASTS.

Authors:  Lawrence Sonvico; Simon M Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Jonathan Bucke; Nicola R Heneghan; Alison Rushton
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-02

7.  Effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc and its effect on vertebral bone stress.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Michael G Jekir; Maxwell W Davis; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Christopher J Colloca; Donald D Harrison; Tadeusz J Janik; Jason W Haas; Tony S Keller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical analysis of reducing sacroiliac joint shear load by optimization of pelvic muscle and ligament forces.

Authors:  J J M Pel; C W Spoor; A L Pool-Goudzwaard; G A Hoek van Dijke; C J Snijders
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis system.

Authors:  Maria Moutzouri; Evdokia Billis; Nikolaos Strimpakos; Polixeni Kottika; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.