Literature DB >> 26943358

[Hypersensitivity reactions to implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators].

B Kreft1.   

Abstract

Nowadays, for modern electrotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias different pacemaker systems are used. Antibradycardia pacing systems (e. g. single-chamber, two-chamber, three-chamber systems, frequency-adapted pacemaker) can be distinguished from antitachycardia pacing systems like implantable or portable cardioverter defibrillators and combined antibradycardia/antitachycardia systems. Cutaneous reactions overlying a pacemaker or defibrillator are often termed "pacemaker dermatitis". In terms of the differential diagnostic workup, these cutaneous reactions can have various causes. After exclusion of infection by analyzing clinical and laboratory-chemical results, "pressure dermatitis" or the often clinically asymptomatic "reticular telangiectatic erythema" (synonym "postimplantation erythema") must be considered. Histological examination of the affected skin can contribute to the diagnosis. In case of suspected contact hypersensitivity to implant material, allergological exploration should be realized. In addition to patch testing with commercially available contact allergens, product-related material metal alloy discs are often available from the pacemaker manufacturer for epicutaneous testing. Due to the lack of additional benefit compared to standardized patch testing, a clear recommendation for such metal alloy discs cannot be given. In selected cases of suspected hypersensitivity reaction, sensitization can eventually be analyzed by the lymphocyte transformation test. Positive reactions must always be critically interpreted taking into consideration the corresponding clinical signs. Depending on the cause, cutaneous reactions are occasionally self-limiting. In many cases, however, removal of the pacemaker is inevitable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergy; Arrhythmias, cardiac; Dermatitis; Infections; Patch test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943358     DOI: 10.1007/s00105-016-3775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hautarzt        ISSN: 0017-8470            Impact factor:   0.751


  34 in total

1.  Delayed development of foreign body granuloma from an implanted permanent cardiac pacemaker.

Authors:  Tanawatt Kootiratrakarn; Yutaka Kimura; Jun Matsunaga; Hachiro Tagami
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.005

Review 2.  [DKG statement on the use of metal alloy discs for patch testing in suspected intolerance to metal implants].

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Johannes Geier; Heinrich Dickel; Thomas Diepgen; Uwe Hillen; Burkhard Kreft; Axel Schnuch; Christiane Szliska; Vera Mahler
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.584

Review 3.  Impaired wound-healing, local eczema, and chronic inflammation following titanium osteosynthesis in a nickel and cobalt-allergic patient: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Manfred Thomas; Burkhard Summer; Karin Dietrich; Melanie Zauzig; Erwin Steinhauser; Veit Krenn; Hans Arnholdt; Michael J Flaig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Granulomatous dermatitis after implantation of a titanium-containing pacemaker.

Authors:  R Viraben; S Boulinguez; C Alba
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Guidelines for the diagnosis, management and prevention of implantable cardiac electronic device infection.

Authors:  James L Harrison; Bernard D Prendergast; Jonathan A T Sandoe
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Nonstaphylococcal infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  George M Viola; Leah L Awan; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Frequency of permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

Authors:  Daniel Z Uslan; Muhammad R Sohail; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Walter R Wilson; James M Steckelberg; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Pompholyx after implantation of a nickel-containing pacemaker in a nickel-allergic patient.

Authors:  A J Landwehr; W G van Ketel
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Pacemaker contact sensitivity.

Authors:  M S Peters; A L Schroeter; H M van Hale; J C Broadbent
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Allergy to pacemaker silicone compounds: recognition and surgical management.

Authors:  Mihaela L Oprea; Heike Schnöring; Jörg S Sachweh; Hagen Ott; Julia Biertz; Jaime F Vazquez-Jimenez
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.