Literature DB >> 19324172

Allergy to pacemaker silicone compounds: recognition and surgical management.

Mihaela L Oprea1, Heike Schnöring, Jörg S Sachweh, Hagen Ott, Julia Biertz, Jaime F Vazquez-Jimenez.   

Abstract

Silicone is a widely used biomaterial. Contact allergy, particularly to silicone components of pacemaker coatings, is uncommon. We present a 12-year-old girl with a history of complex congenital heart disease and acquired complete heart block excluding transvenous lead placement. Contact allergy to silicone led to multiple surgical interventions until the etiology for recurrent pacemaker wound complications was discovered. The key to diagnosis was a specific manufacturer's patch test. Complete removal of the former pacing system and placement of custom-made silicone free pacemaker components and epicardial use of silicone free transvenous leads were essential for successful therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19324172     DOI： 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN： 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  [Long-term results, status of studies and differential indication regarding the DIAM implant].

Authors:  F A Krappel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices.

Authors:  Marcella Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Long-term results of a cardiovascular implantable electronic device wrapped with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet.

Authors:  Bun Yashiro; Morio Shoda; Yasuko Tomizawa; Tetsuyuki Manaka; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Cardiac rhythm device contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Jaskaran Kang; Christopher S Simpson; Debra Campbell; Rozita Borici-Mazi; Damian P Redfearn; Kevin A Michael; Hoshiar Abdollah; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  [Hypersensitivity reactions to implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators].

Authors:  B Kreft
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Long-term outcome of complete cardiovascular implantable electronic device removal with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Masaho Okada; Yuji Narita; Yoshimori Araki; Hideki Oshima; Akihiko Usui; Yuichi Ueda
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  A Rare Case of Recurrent Pacemaker Allergic Reaction.

Authors:  Muhammed Shittu; Pooja Shah; Walid Elkhalili; Addi Suleiman; Hamid Shaaban; Pradip A Shah; Fayez Shamoon
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Pacing lead-induced granuloma in the atrium: a foreign body reaction to polyurethane.

Authors:  Shinagawa Yoko; Yuka Kobayashi; Takao Iiri; Hitoshi Kitazawa; Masaaki Okabe; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Etsuo Okazaki; Yoshifusa Aizawa
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-29

9.  Hypersensitivity to material and environmental burden as a possible cause of late complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Jan Manoušek; Irena Andršová; Vera Stejskal; Jitka Vlašínová; Milan Sepši; Jan Kuta; Jana Klánová; Michal Mazík; Jirí Jarkovský; Lenka Šnajdrová; Klára Benešová; Tomáš Novotný; Andrea Zadáková; Jindrich Špinar
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.214
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.