Literature DB >> 26942853

Bmi1 Is a Key Epigenetic Barrier to Direct Cardiac Reprogramming.

Yang Zhou1, Li Wang1, Haley Ruth Vaseghi1, Ziqing Liu1, Rui Lu2, Sahar Alimohamadi1, Chaoying Yin1, Ji-Dong Fu3, Greg G Wang4, Jiandong Liu1, Li Qian5.   

Abstract

Direct reprogramming of induced cardiomyocytes (iCMs) suffers from low efficiency and requires extensive epigenetic repatterning, although the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. To address these issues, we screened for epigenetic regulators of iCM reprogramming and found that reducing levels of the polycomb complex gene Bmi1 significantly enhanced induction of beating iCMs from neonatal and adult mouse fibroblasts. The inhibitory role of Bmi1 in iCM reprogramming is mediated through direct interactions with regulatory regions of cardiogenic genes, rather than regulation of cell proliferation. Reduced Bmi1 expression corresponded with increased levels of the active histone mark H3K4me3 and reduced levels of repressive H2AK119ub at cardiogenic loci, and de-repression of cardiogenic gene expression during iCM conversion. Furthermore, Bmi1 deletion could substitute for Gata4 during iCM reprogramming. Thus, Bmi1 acts as a critical epigenetic barrier to iCM production. Bypassing this barrier simplifies iCM generation and increases yield, potentially streamlining iCM production for therapeutic purposes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bmi1; Gata4; Mef2c; Tbx5; cardiac reprogramming; cardiomyocyte; chromatin modification; epigenetic; fibroblast; iCM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26942853      PMCID: PMC4779178          DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stem Cell        ISSN: 1875-9777            Impact factor:   24.633


  62 in total

Review 1.  Bmi1, stem cells, and senescence regulation.

Authors:  In-Kyung Park; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart.

Authors:  Eric N Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective.

Authors:  Gaoyang Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 4.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yosef Buganim; Dina A Faddah; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Induction of human cardiomyocyte-like cells from fibroblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Rie Wada; Naoto Muraoka; Kohei Inagawa; Hiroyuki Yamakawa; Kazutaka Miyamoto; Taketaro Sadahiro; Tomohiko Umei; Ruri Kaneda; Tomoyuki Suzuki; Kaichiro Kamiya; Shugo Tohyama; Shinsuke Yuasa; Kiyokazu Kokaji; Ryo Aeba; Ryohei Yozu; Hiroyuki Yamagishi; Toshio Kitamura; Keiichi Fukuda; Masaki Ieda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Alternative reading frames of the INK4a tumor suppressor gene encode two unrelated proteins capable of inducing cell cycle arrest.

Authors:  D E Quelle; F Zindy; R A Ashmun; C J Sherr
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A temporal chromatin signature in human embryonic stem cells identifies regulators of cardiac development.

Authors:  Sharon L Paige; Sean Thomas; Cristi L Stoick-Cooper; Hao Wang; Lisa Maves; Richard Sandstrom; Lil Pabon; Hans Reinecke; Gabriel Pratt; Gordon Keller; Randall T Moon; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The Ink4a/Arf locus is a barrier to direct neuronal transdifferentiation.

Authors:  James D Price; Ki-Youb Park; Jiadong Chen; Ryan D Salinas; Mathew J Cho; Arnold R Kriegstein; Daniel A Lim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Polycomb Regulates Mesoderm Cell Fate-Specification in Embryonic Stem Cells through Activation and Repression Mechanisms.

Authors:  Lluis Morey; Alexandra Santanach; Enrique Blanco; Luigi Aloia; Elphège P Nora; Benoit G Bruneau; Luciano Di Croce
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming.

Authors:  Tamer T Onder; Nergis Kara; Anne Cherry; Amit U Sinha; Nan Zhu; Kathrin M Bernt; Patrick Cahan; B Ogan Marcarci; Juli Unternaehrer; Piyush B Gupta; Eric S Lander; Scott A Armstrong; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  97 in total

1.  Comparative Gene Expression Analyses Reveal Distinct Molecular Signatures between Differentially Reprogrammed Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Li Wang; Ziqing Liu; Sahar Alimohamadi; Chaoying Yin; Jiandong Liu; Li Qian
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Discovery and progress of direct cardiac reprogramming.

Authors:  Hidenori Kojima; Masaki Ieda
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Reprogramming Enhancers in Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, iPSC Technology, and Direct Conversion.

Authors:  Daekee Kwon; Minjun Ji; Seunghee Lee; Kwang Won Seo; Kyung-Sun Kang
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  In situ reprogramming to transdifferentiate fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using adenoviral vectors: Implications for clinical myocardial regeneration.

Authors:  Megumi Mathison; Vivek P Singh; Maria J Chiuchiolo; Deepthi Sanagasetti; Yun Mao; Vivekkumar B Patel; Jianchang Yang; Stephen M Kaminsky; Ronald G Crystal; Todd K Rosengart
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  B lymphoma Moloney murine leukemia virus insertion region 1 homolog: the Janus-faced polycomb protein that will break your heart.

Authors:  Cameron G McCarthy; Camilla Ferreira Wenceslau; Bina Joe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  In Vivo Cellular Reprogramming: The Next Generation.

Authors:  Deepak Srivastava; Natalie DeWitt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Improving cardiac reprogramming for heart regeneration.

Authors:  Liu Liu; Ienglam Lei; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 8.  Molecular discoveries and treatment strategies by direct reprogramming in cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  John H Werner; John H Rosenberg; John Y Um; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 7.012

9.  Generation of an inducible fibroblast cell line for studying direct cardiac reprogramming.

Authors:  Haley Ruth Vaseghi; Chaoying Yin; Yang Zhou; Li Wang; Jiandong Liu; Li Qian
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 10.  Myocardial plasticity: cardiac development, regeneration and disease.

Authors:  Joshua Bloomekatz; Manuel Galvez-Santisteban; Neil C Chi
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.