Literature DB >> 23861494

Induction of human cardiomyocyte-like cells from fibroblasts by defined factors.

Rie Wada1, Naoto Muraoka, Kohei Inagawa, Hiroyuki Yamakawa, Kazutaka Miyamoto, Taketaro Sadahiro, Tomohiko Umei, Ruri Kaneda, Tomoyuki Suzuki, Kaichiro Kamiya, Shugo Tohyama, Shinsuke Yuasa, Kiyokazu Kokaji, Ryo Aeba, Ryohei Yozu, Hiroyuki Yamagishi, Toshio Kitamura, Keiichi Fukuda, Masaki Ieda.   

Abstract

Heart disease remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Owing to the limited regenerative capacity of heart tissue, cardiac regenerative therapy has emerged as an attractive approach. Direct reprogramming of human cardiac fibroblasts (HCFs) into cardiomyocytes may hold great potential for this purpose. We reported previously that induced cardiomyocyte-like cells (iCMs) can be directly generated from mouse cardiac fibroblasts in vitro and vivo by transduction of three transcription factors: Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5, collectively termed GMT. In the present study, we sought to determine whether human fibroblasts also could be converted to iCMs by defined factors. Our initial finding that GMT was not sufficient for cardiac induction in HCFs prompted us to screen for additional factors to promote cardiac reprogramming by analyzing multiple cardiac-specific gene induction with quantitative RT-PCR. The addition of Mesp1 and Myocd to GMT up-regulated a broader spectrum of cardiac genes in HCFs more efficiently compared with GMT alone. The HCFs and human dermal fibroblasts transduced with GMT, Mesp1, and Myocd (GMTMM) changed the cell morphology from a spindle shape to a rod-like or polygonal shape, expressed multiple cardiac-specific proteins, increased a broad range of cardiac genes and concomitantly suppressed fibroblast genes, and exhibited spontaneous Ca(2+) oscillations. Moreover, the cells matured to exhibit action potentials and contract synchronously in coculture with murine cardiomyocytes. A 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine assay revealed that the iCMs thus generated do not pass through a mitotic cell state. These findings demonstrate that human fibroblasts can be directly converted to iCMs by defined factors, which may facilitate future applications in regenerative medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiogenesis; cell fate conversion; regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23861494      PMCID: PMC3732928          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304053110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Reprogramming a broken heart.

Authors:  Emil M Hansson; Kenneth R Chien
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Critical factors for cardiac reprogramming.

Authors:  Deepak Srivastava; Masaki Ieda
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Direct conversion of mouse fibroblasts to self-renewing, tripotent neural precursor cells.

Authors:  Ernesto Lujan; Soham Chanda; Henrik Ahlenius; Thomas C Südhof; Marius Wernig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mesp1 acts as a master regulator of multipotent cardiovascular progenitor specification.

Authors:  Antoine Bondue; Gaëlle Lapouge; Catherine Paulissen; Claudio Semeraro; Michelina Iacovino; Michael Kyba; Cédric Blanpain
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Reprogramming of human fibroblasts toward a cardiac fate.

Authors:  Young-Jae Nam; Kunhua Song; Xiang Luo; Edward Daniel; Kaleb Lambeth; Katherine West; Joseph A Hill; J Michael DiMaio; Linda A Baker; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Myocardin is differentially required for the development of smooth muscle cells and cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Mark H Hoofnagle; Ronald L Neppl; Erica L Berzin; G C Teg Pipes; Eric N Olson; Brian W Wamhoff; Avril V Somlyo; Gary K Owens
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Induction of cardiomyocyte-like cells in infarct hearts by gene transfer of Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5.

Authors:  Kohei Inagawa; Kazutaka Miyamoto; Hiroyuki Yamakawa; Naoto Muraoka; Taketaro Sadahiro; Tomohiko Umei; Rie Wada; Yoshinori Katsumata; Ruri Kaneda; Koji Nakade; Chitose Kurihara; Yuichi Obata; Koichi Miyake; Keiichi Fukuda; Masaki Ieda
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors.

Authors:  Masaki Ieda; Ji-Dong Fu; Paul Delgado-Olguin; Vasanth Vedantham; Yohei Hayashi; Benoit G Bruneau; Deepak Srivastava
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Inefficient reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using Gata4, Mef2c, and Tbx5.

Authors:  Jenny X Chen; Markus Krane; Marcus-Andre Deutsch; Li Wang; Moshe Rav-Acha; Serge Gregoire; Marc C Engels; Kuppusamy Rajarajan; Ravi Karra; E Dale Abel; Joe C Wu; David Milan; Sean M Wu
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to beta-cells.

Authors:  Qiao Zhou; Juliana Brown; Andrew Kanarek; Jayaraj Rajagopal; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  149 in total

1.  In vivo cardiac reprogramming using an optimal single polycistronic construct.

Authors:  Hong Ma; Li Wang; Chaoying Yin; Jiandong Liu; Li Qian
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 2.  Direct somatic lineage conversion.

Authors:  Koji Tanabe; Daniel Haag; Marius Wernig
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Cardiac reprogramming: from mouse toward man.

Authors:  Deepak Srivastava; Emily C Berry
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 4.  Cardiac fibrosis: potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Shuin Park; Ngoc B Nguyen; Arash Pezhouman; Reza Ardehali
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 7.012

5.  Comparative Gene Expression Analyses Reveal Distinct Molecular Signatures between Differentially Reprogrammed Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Li Wang; Ziqing Liu; Sahar Alimohamadi; Chaoying Yin; Jiandong Liu; Li Qian
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Isoproterenol directs hair follicle-associated pluripotent (HAP) stem cells to differentiate in vitro to cardiac muscle cells which can be induced to form beating heart-muscle tissue sheets.

Authors:  Aiko Yamazaki; Masateru Yashiro; Sumiyuki Mii; Ryoichi Aki; Yuko Hamada; Nobuko Arakawa; Katsumasa Kawahara; Robert M Hoffman; Yasuyuki Amoh
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  From hair to heart: nestin-expressing hair-follicle-associated pluripotent (HAP) stem cells differentiate to beating cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  Masateru Yashiro; Sumiyuki Mii; Ryoichi Aki; Yuko Hamada; Nobuko Arakawa; Katsumasa Kawahara; Robert M Hoffman; Yasuyuki Amoh
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Cardiac cell proliferation assessed by EdU, a novel analysis of cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  Bin Zeng; Suiyang Tong; Xiaofeng Ren; Hao Xia
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Direct conversion of human fibroblasts into functional osteoblasts by defined factors.

Authors:  Kenta Yamamoto; Tsunao Kishida; Yoshiki Sato; Keisuke Nishioka; Akika Ejima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo; Toshiro Yamamoto; Narisato Kanamura; Osam Mazda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Molecular discoveries and treatment strategies by direct reprogramming in cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  John H Werner; John H Rosenberg; John Y Um; Michael J Moulton; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 7.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.