Literature DB >> 22414212

Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings.

Pei-Ying Hong1, Xiangzhen Li, Xufei Yang, Takumi Shinkai, Yuanhui Zhang, Xinlei Wang, Roderick I Mackie.   

Abstract

Given the growing concerns over human and animal health issues related to confined animal feeding operations, an in-depth examination is required to monitor for airborne bacteria and associated antibiotic resistance genes. Our 16S rRNA-based pyrosequencing revealed that the airborne microbial community skewed towards a higher abundance of Firmicutes (> 59.2%) and Bacteroidetes (4.2-31.4%) within the confinement buildings, while the office environment was predominated by Proteobacteria (55.2%). Furthermore, bioaerosols in the confinement buildings were sporadically associated with genera of potential pathogens, and these genera were more frequently observed in the bioaerosols of pig and layer hen confinement than the turkey confinement buildings and office environment. High abundances of tetracycline resistance genes (9.55 × 10(2) to 1.69 × 10(6) copies ng(-1) DNA) were also detected in the bioaerosols sampled from confinement buildings. Bacterial lineages present in the poultry bioaerosols clustered apart from those present in the pig bioaerosols and among the different phases of pig production, suggesting that different livestock as well as production phase were associated with a distinct airborne microbial community. By understanding the diversity of biotic contaminants associated with the different confinement buildings, this study facilitates the implementation of better management strategies to minimize potential health impacts on both livestock and humans working in this environment.
© 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22414212     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  21 in total

1.  Simulation of air quality and operational cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in Midwest U.S. during winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel M Jones; Richard Gassman; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.188

2.  Manure removal system influences the abundance and composition of airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumari; Hong Lim Choi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity: insights and implications for respiratory health.

Authors:  Chakia J McClendon; Carresse L Gerald; Jenora T Waterman
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-04

4.  The Indoor-Air Microbiota of Pig Farms Drives the Composition of the Pig Farmers' Nasal Microbiota in a Season-Dependent and Farm-Specific Manner.

Authors:  Julia G Kraemer; Susanne Aebi; Anne Oppliger; Markus Hilty
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Cow Farmers' Homes Host More Diverse Airborne Bacterial Communities Than Pig Farmers' Homes and Suburban Homes.

Authors:  Hesham Amin; Tina Šantl-Temkiv; Christine Cramer; Ditte V Vestergaard; Gitte J Holst; Grethe Elholm; Kai Finster; Randi J Bertelsen; Vivi Schlünssen; Torben Sigsgaard; Ian P G Marshall
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Simulation of air quality and cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Russell A Sawvel; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Comput Electron Agric       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.565

7.  Monitoring the perturbation of soil and groundwater microbial communities due to pig production activities.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Hong; Anthony C Yannarell; Qinghua Dai; Melike Ekizoglu; Roderick I Mackie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Spread of tetracycline resistance genes at a conventional dairy farm.

Authors:  Martina Kyselková; Jiří Jirout; Naděžda Vrchotová; Heike Schmitt; Dana Elhottová
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Seasonal variability in airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  Priyanka Kumari; Hong L Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic analyses of dusts from swine confinement and grain facilities.

Authors:  Robert J Boissy; Debra J Romberger; William A Roughead; Lisa Weissenburger-Moser; Jill A Poole; Tricia D LeVan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.