Literature DB >> 12853272

Synergistic effects of dust and ammonia on the occupational health effects of poultry production workers.

Kelley J Donham1, Debra Cumro, Steve Reynolds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As production methods for livestock and poultry moved towards large industrial-scale confinement facilities, the occupational health community reported risks for respiratory illnesses in workers. Likely, greater risks for respiratory disease will occur with the continuing trend towards full-time confinement workers, who inspire a combination of bioaerosols, particulates, and gases. Although there have been numerous studies on the individual health effects of air contaminants inside confined animal production facilities, there have been no reports on the effects of combined exposures. The objective of this study was to investigate the combined health effects of air contaminants on poultry production workers. SAMPLE POPULATION: Two hundred and fifty-seven poultry production workers participated in this study. The workers represented various areas of the poultry industry, including turkey growing, broiler production, egg laying, and unloading/shakeling in poultry processing. Worker procedures pulmonary function testing was conducted before and after a four-hour work shift. The work environment was assessed for total and respirable dust, ammonia, endotoxin and CO2. The relationship of simultaneous total dust and ammonia exposures was examined by correlation, logistic modeling, and synergy index calculations.
RESULTS: Synergy between ammonia levels and airborne dust explained up to 43% and 63% of the decline (respectively for Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV) in one second and Forced Expiratory Flow (FEF25-75) in pulmonary function over the work shift. Furthermore, assessing the synergy index indicated the combined effect of dust and ammonia is from 53 to 156% (greater combined than individually). The proportion of health effect due to synergy is 35%-61%.
CONCLUSIONS: Synergy of simultaneous dust and ammonia exposures in a working environment raises the question of redefining exposure limits for organic dust and ammonia when workers are exposed simultaneously to these substances. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Control of both dust and ammonia in livestock facilities is extremely important. Lack of control of both these contaminants will increase the risk of respiratory dysfunction to all exposed to this environment, including workers and veterinarians.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12853272     DOI: 10.1300/J096v08n02_09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agromedicine        ISSN: 1059-924X            Impact factor:   1.675


  16 in total

1.  Simulation of air quality and operational cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in Midwest U.S. during winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel M Jones; Richard Gassman; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Trans ASABE       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.188

2.  Ambient Ammonia Exposures in an Agricultural Community and Pediatric Asthma Morbidity.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Michael Yost; Paul Sampson; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Victoria Breckwich Vasquez; Kris Hartin; Jenna Armstrong; Maria Tchong-French; Sverre Vedal; Parveen Bhatti; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 4.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Muramic acid, endotoxin, 3-hydroxy fatty acids, and ergosterol content explain monocyte and epithelial cell inflammatory responses to agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Jill A Poole; Gregory P Dooley; Rena Saito; Angela M Burrell; Kristina L Bailey; Debra J Romberger; John Mehaffy; Stephen J Reynolds
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2010

6.  An Epidemiological Study to Investigate Links between Atmospheric Pollution from Farming and SARS-CoV-2 Mortality.

Authors:  Paolo Contiero; Alessandro Borgini; Martina Bertoldi; Anna Abita; Giuseppe Cuffari; Paola Tomao; Maria Concetta D'Ovidio; Stefano Reale; Silvia Scibetta; Giovanna Tagliabue; Roberto Boffi; Vittorio Krogh; Fabio Tramuto; Carmelo Massimo Maida; Walter Mazzucco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Simulation of air quality and cost to ventilate swine farrowing facilities in winter.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters; Ralph Altmaier; Russell A Sawvel; T Renée Anthony
Journal:  Comput Electron Agric       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.565

8.  Community health and socioeconomic issues surrounding concentrated animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Kelley J Donham; Steven Wing; David Osterberg; Jan L Flora; Carol Hodne; Kendall M Thu; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Multiple exposures to swine barn air induce lung inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Charavaryamath; Kyathanahalli S Janardhan; Hugh G Townsend; Philip Willson; Baljit Singh
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2005-06-02

Review 10.  Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems may have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part II-Ammonia.

Authors:  Bruce David; Cecilie Mejdell; Virginie Michel; Vonne Lund; Randi Oppermann Moe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.