Literature DB >> 26936579

Behavioural estimates of auditory filter widths in ferrets using notched-noise maskers.

Ana Alves-Pinto1, Joseph Sollini1, Toby Wells1, Christian J Sumner1.   

Abstract

Frequency selectivity is a fundamental property of hearing which affects almost all aspects of auditory processing. Here auditory filter widths at 1, 3, 7, and 10 kHz were estimated from behavioural thresholds using the notched-noise method [Patterson, Nimmo-Smith, Weber, and Milroy, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1788-1803 (1982)] in ferrets. The mean bandwidth was 21% of the signal frequency, excluding wider bandwidths at 1 kHz (65%). They were comparable although on average broader than equivalent measurements in other mammals (∼11%-20%), and wider than bandwidths measured from the auditory nerve in ferrets (∼18%). In non-human mammals there is considerable variation between individuals, species, and in the correspondence with auditory nerve tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936579      PMCID: PMC5714258          DOI: 10.1121/1.4941772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory filter shapes of CBA/CaJ mice: behavioral assessments.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Sarah Kimar; Cynthia A Prosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Andrei N Temchin; Pim van Dijk; Yun-Hui Fan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.

Authors:  S Rosen; R J Baker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith; D L Weber; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla.

Authors:  A J Niemiec; W A Yost; W P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory nerve fibre responses in the ferret.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Signal detection in animal psychoacoustics: analysis and simulation of sensory and decision-related influences.

Authors:  A Alves-Pinto; J Sollini; C J Sumner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.590

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  A Crucial Test of the Population Separation Model of Auditory Stream Segregation in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Mimi Kim; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

Authors:  Braden N Maxwell; Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Broadened population-level frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of tinnitus patients.

Authors:  Kenichi Sekiya; Mariko Takahashi; Shingo Murakami; Ryusuke Kakigi; Hidehiko Okamoto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker; Ray Gonzalez; Joe Z Kang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francois Guérit; John C Middlebrooks; Matthew L Richardson; Akshat Arneja; Andrew J Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.