Literature DB >> 1479127

Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla.

A J Niemiec1, W A Yost, W P Shofner.   

Abstract

A simultaneous masking procedure was used to derive four measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla. The first experiment measured critical masking ratios (CRs) at various signal frequencies. Estimates of the chinchillas' critical bandwidths derived from the CRs were much broader than comparable human estimates, indicating that the chinchilla may have inferior frequency selectivity. The second experiment measured critical bandwidths at 1, 2, and 4 kHz in a band-narrowing experiment. This technique yielded narrower estimates of critical bandwidth; however, chinchillas continued to exhibit poor frequency selectivity compared to man. The third experiment measured auditory-filter shape at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz via rippled noise masking. Results of the rippled noise masking experiment indicate that auditory filters of humans and chinchillas are similar in terms of shape and bandwidth with chinchillas showing only slightly poorer frequency selectivity. The final experiment measured auditory filter shape at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz using notched noise masking. This experiment yielded auditory filter shapes and bandwidths similar to those derived from man. The discrepancy between the indirect estimates of frequency selectivity derived from CR and band-narrowing techniques and the direct estimates derived from rippled noise and notched noise masking are explained by taking into account the processing efficiency of the subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1479127     DOI: 10.1121/1.404380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

2.  The conductive hearing loss due to an experimentally induced middle ear effusion alters the interaural level and time difference cues to sound location.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thornton; Keely M Chevallier; Kanthaiah Koka; J Eric Lupo; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-31

Review 3.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

4.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Conductive hearing loss induced by experimental middle-ear effusion in a chinchilla model reveals impaired tympanic membrane-coupled ossicular chain movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thornton; Keely M Chevallier; Kanthaiah Koka; Sandra A Gabbard; Daniel J Tollin; Daniel Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25

Review 7.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Selective Inner Hair Cell Dysfunction in Chinchillas Impairs Hearing-in-Noise in the Absence of Outer Hair Cell Loss.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

10.  Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.