Literature DB >> 22694786

Auditory nerve fibre responses in the ferret.

Christian J Sumner1, Alan R Palmer.   

Abstract

The ferret (Mustela putorius) is a medium-sized, carnivorous mammal with good low-frequency hearing; it is relatively easy to train, and there is therefore a good body of behavioural data detailing its detection thresholds and localization abilities. However, despite extensive studies of the physiology of the central nervous system of the ferret, even extending to the prefrontal cortex, little is known of the functioning of the auditory periphery. Here, we provide an insight into this peripheral function by detailing responses of single auditory nerve fibres. Our expectation was that the ferret auditory nerve responsiveness would be similar that of its near relative, the cat. However, by comparing a range of variables (the frequency tuning, the variation of rate-level functions with spontaneous rate, and the high-frequency cut-off of phase locking) across several species, we show that the auditory nerve (and hence cochlea) in the ferret is more similar to that of the guinea-pig and chinchilla than to that of the cat. Animal models of hearing are often chosen on the basis of the similarity of their audiogram to that of the human, particularly in the low-frequency region. We show here that whereas the ferret hears well at low frequencies, this is likely to occur via fibres with higher characteristic frequencies. These qualitative differences in response characteristics in auditory nerve fibres are important in interpreting data across all of auditory science, as it has been argued recently that tuning in animals is broader than in humans.
© 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22694786      PMCID: PMC6485459          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08151.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  66 in total

1.  Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse.

Authors:  Annette M Taberner; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A comparison between basilar membrane and inner hair cell receptor potential input-output functions in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; P M Sellick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties.

Authors:  M C Liberman; M E Oliver
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  L A Westerman; R L Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear.

Authors:  C M Hillery; P M Narins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cochlear fibre rate--intensity functions: no evidence for basilar membrane nonlinearities.

Authors:  A R Palmer; E F Evans
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.

Authors:  D M Harris; P Dallos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  26 in total

1.  Temporal processing properties of auditory DUM neurons in a bush-cricket.

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Paule Chloé Lefebvre; Marvin Seifert; Tim Daniel Ostrowski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Translational issues in cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; Erik Larsen; Michael G Heinz; Leslie Shinobu; Jonathon P Whitton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cochlear tuning and the peripheral representation of harmonic sounds in mammals.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.389

4.  Behavioural estimates of auditory filter widths in ferrets using notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Ana Alves-Pinto; Joseph Sollini; Toby Wells; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interaction of interaural cues and their contribution to the lateralisation of Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus).

Authors:  Sandra Tolnai; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The role of spectral cues in timbre discrimination by ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Huriye Atilgan; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The neural substrate for binaural masking level differences in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Heather J Gilbert; Trevor M Shackleton; Katrin Krumbholz; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 9.  Modeling auditory coding: from sound to spikes.

Authors:  Marek Rudnicki; Oliver Schoppe; Michael Isik; Florian Völk; Werner Hemmert
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Mistuning detection performance of ferrets in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Natsumi Y Homma; Victoria M Bajo; Max F K Happel; Fernando R Nodal; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.