Literature DB >> 2691473

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the European edible frog (Rana esculenta): spectral details and temperature dependence.

P van Dijk1, H P Wit, J M Segenhout.   

Abstract

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions were recorded in 41 ears of 29 European edible frogs (Rana esculenta). Emission frequencies ranged from 450 to 1350 Hz. The distribution of frequencies shows two distinct populations: one above and one below 1 kHz. With one exception, a maximum number of two emissions were recorded per ear, each in a different population. An amplitude distribution of a frog emission was sampled, from which it was concluded that the emission is generated by an active oscillator. The spectral width of an emission ranged from 1 to 200 Hz (average 38 Hz). There was negative correlation between sound pressure level of an emission and spectral width. In 4 frogs the dependence of emission power and frequency on temperature was investigated. An emission could be 'switched on and off' within a few degrees centigrade. At temperatures below the switching interval no emission was recorded; for higher temperatures emission power showed no dependence on temperature. Frequency increased with temperature (Q10 = 1.1 to 1.3). This yields a mismatch with temperature dependence of best frequencies of auditory fibers. The consequences of this mismatch are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2691473     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90151-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Temperature dependence of anuran distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-25

Review 3.  Mechanics of the frog ear.

Authors:  Pim Van Dijk; Matthew J Mason; Richard L M Schoffelen; Peter M Narins; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The effects of air pressure on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions of lizards.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09

5.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. I. Concomitant shifts in biosonar emission frequency.

Authors:  R F Huffman; O W Henson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko subfamilies: morphological implications for auditory function in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-07

Review 8.  Mechanics of the exceptional anuran ear.

Authors:  Richard L M Schoffelen; Johannes M Segenhout; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Bilateral Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Show Coupling between Active Oscillators in the Two Ears.

Authors:  Yuttana Roongthumskul; Dáibhid Ó Maoiléidigh; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Study of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions during hypothermia in humans.

Authors:  Andrei Borin; Oswaldo Laércio Mendonça Cruz
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 May-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.