Literature DB >> 8441121

Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. I. Concomitant shifts in biosonar emission frequency.

R F Huffman1, O W Henson.   

Abstract

The cochlea of the mustached bat (Pteronotus parnellii) has sharp tuning characteristics and pronounced resonance within a narrow band near the second harmonic, constant frequency (CF2) component of the animal's biosonar signals. That fine frequency discrimination occurs within this narrow band is evident from Doppler-shift compensation, whereby bats in flight lower the frequency of emitted CF2s to maintain returning echoes within this band. This study examined various factors capable of producing shifts in both the cochlear resonance frequency (CRF) and CF2s emitted by stationary bats and bats actively Doppler-shift compensating on a pendulum. Each of three experimental factors shifted the CRF in a reversible manner. Changes in body temperature produced an average CRF shift of 39 +/- 18 Hz/degrees C. The CRF increased with flight by 150 +/- 100 Hz and returned to baseline values within 10 min after flight. Contralateral sound exposure produced smaller (100 +/- 20 Hz), rapid shifts in the CRF, suggesting that a mechanism different from the temperature- and flight-related shifts was involved. Changes in the CRF induced by temperature and flight were accompanied by shifts in the emitted CF2 of stationary and moving bats. Coupled with a companion study of associated shifts in neural tuning, the concomitant changes in CRF and CF2 provide evidence of cochlear tuning lability in the mustached bat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441121     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  43 in total

1.  Specializations for sharp tuning in the mustached bat: the tectorial membrane and spiral limbus.

Authors:  M M Henson; O W Henson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation.

Authors:  N Suga; H Niwa; I Taniguchi; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. II. Concomitant shifts in neural tuning.

Authors:  R F Huffman; O W Henson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Evoked acoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii.

Authors:  M Kössl; M Vater
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  No sharpening? a challenge for cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On active and passive cochlear models--toward a generalized analysis.

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  What basilar-membrane tuning says about cochlear micromechanics.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E J Kletsky
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J B Kobler; B S Wilson; O W Henson; A L Bishop
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Micromechanics in the theory of cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E J Kletsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Further studies on the peripheral auditory system of 'CF-FM' bats specialized for fine frequency analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes.

Authors:  N Suga; P H Jen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  14 in total

1.  Convergence of reference frequencies by multiple CF-FM bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) during paired flights evaluated with onboard microphones.

Authors:  Yuto Furusawa; Shizuko Hiryu; Kohta I Kobayasi; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Intra-individual variation in the vocalized frequency of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros terasensis, influenced by conspecific colony members.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Koji Katsura; Tsuyoshi Nagato; Hideo Yamazaki; Liang-Kong Lin; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Hiroshi Riquimaroux
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude.

Authors:  Shizuko Hiryu; Yu Shiori; Tatsuro Hosokawa; Hiroshi Riquimaroux; Yoshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Reorganization of the cochleotopic map in the bat's auditory system by inhibition.

Authors:  Zhongju Xiao; Nobuo Suga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Morphological correlates of echolocation frequency in the endemic Cape horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus capensis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae).

Authors:  Lizelle J Odendaal; David S Jacobs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. II. Concomitant shifts in neural tuning.

Authors:  R F Huffman; O W Henson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Basilar membrane resonance in the cochlea of the mustached bat.

Authors:  M Kössl; I J Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Determinants of echolocation call frequency variation in the Formosan lesser horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus monoceros).

Authors:  Shiang-Fan Chen; Gareth Jones; Stephen J Rossiter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Different auditory feedback control for echolocation and communication in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.