BACKGROUND: Accumulating data suggest that team-based learning (TBL) is more effective than lecture-based teaching strategies. Educational sessions at national meetings, however, tend to be lecture-based, and unlike most examples of TBL, involve participants who do not know each other or the instructor. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a 1-day TBL genomic pathology workshop for residents held at 3 national meetings. METHODS: A committee of experts developed the workshop. Prior to attending, participants were provided access to readings and asked to answer preparation questions. Each of the 4 modules within the workshop consisted of a 60-minute TBL activity flanked by 15- to 30-minute preactivity and postactivity lectures. We used surveys to acquire participant evaluation of the workshop. RESULTS: From 2013-2014, 86 pathology residents from 61 programs participated in 3 workshops at national meetings. All workshops were well received, with over 90% of attendees indicating that they would recommend them to other residents and that the material would help them as practicing pathologists. An incremental approach facilitated decreasing faculty presence at the workshops: the first 2 workshops had 7 faculty each (1 facilitator for each team and 1 circulating faculty member), while the final workshop involved only 2 faculty for 6 teams. For this final session, participants agreed that circulating faculty provided adequate support. Participant "buy-in" (requiring completion of a preworkshop survey) was critical in enabling a TBL approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that TBL is a feasible and effective strategy for teaching genomic medicine that is acceptable to pathology residents at national meetings.
BACKGROUND: Accumulating data suggest that team-based learning (TBL) is more effective than lecture-based teaching strategies. Educational sessions at national meetings, however, tend to be lecture-based, and unlike most examples of TBL, involve participants who do not know each other or the instructor. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a 1-day TBL genomic pathology workshop for residents held at 3 national meetings. METHODS: A committee of experts developed the workshop. Prior to attending, participants were provided access to readings and asked to answer preparation questions. Each of the 4 modules within the workshop consisted of a 60-minute TBL activity flanked by 15- to 30-minute preactivity and postactivity lectures. We used surveys to acquire participant evaluation of the workshop. RESULTS: From 2013-2014, 86 pathology residents from 61 programs participated in 3 workshops at national meetings. All workshops were well received, with over 90% of attendees indicating that they would recommend them to other residents and that the material would help them as practicing pathologists. An incremental approach facilitated decreasing faculty presence at the workshops: the first 2 workshops had 7 faculty each (1 facilitator for each team and 1 circulating faculty member), while the final workshop involved only 2 faculty for 6 teams. For this final session, participants agreed that circulating faculty provided adequate support. Participant "buy-in" (requiring completion of a preworkshop survey) was critical in enabling a TBL approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that TBL is a feasible and effective strategy for teaching genomic medicine that is acceptable to pathology residents at national meetings.
Authors: Paul Haidet; Ruth E Levine; Dean X Parmelee; Sheila Crow; Frances Kennedy; P Adam Kelly; Linda Perkowski; Larry Michaelsen; Boyd F Richards Journal: Acad Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Richard L Haspel; Ramy Arnaout; Lauren Briere; Sibel Kantarci; Karen Marchand; Peter Tonellato; James Connolly; Mark S Boguski; Jeffrey E Saffitz Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Tamar C Brandler; Jordan Laser; Alex K Williamson; James Louie; Michael J Esposito Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Richard L Haspel; Asma M Ali; Grace C Huang; Matt H Smith; James B Atkinson; Devon S Chabot-Richards; Robin M Elliott; Karen L Kaul; Suzanne Z Powell; Arundhati Rao; Henry M Rinder; Chad M Vanderbilt; Rebecca Wilcox Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Rebecca L Wilcox; Patricia V Adem; Ebrahim Afshinnekoo; James B Atkinson; Leah W Burke; Hoiwan Cheung; Shoumita Dasgupta; Julia DeLaGarza; Loren Joseph; Robin LeGallo; Madelyn Lew; Christina M Lockwood; Alice Meiss; Jennifer Norman; Priscilla Markwood; Hasan Rizvi; Kate P Shane-Carson; Mark E Sobel; Eric Suarez; Laura J Tafe; Jason Wang; Richard L Haspel Journal: Per Med Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Richard L Haspel; Jonathan R Genzen; Jay Wagner; Christina M Lockwood; Karen Fong Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Rebecca Wellmann; Brittany A Borden; Keith Danahey; Rita Nanda; Blase N Polite; Walter M Stadler; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 6.860