Literature DB >> 26912437

Event-by-Event Continuous Respiratory Motion Correction for Dynamic PET Imaging.

Yunhan Yu1, Chung Chan2, Tianyu Ma3, Yaqiang Liu3, Jean-Dominique Gallezot2, Mika Naganawa2, Olivia J Kelada4, Mary Germino5, Albert J Sinusas6, Richard E Carson7, Chi Liu8.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Existing respiratory motion-correction methods are applied only to static PET imaging. We have previously developed an event-by-event respiratory motion-correction method with correlations between internal organ motion and external respiratory signals (INTEX). This method is uniquely appropriate for dynamic imaging because it corrects motion for each time point. In this study, we applied INTEX to human dynamic PET studies with various tracers and investigated the impact on kinetic parameter estimation.
METHODS: The use of 3 tracers-a myocardial perfusion tracer, (82)Rb (n = 7); a pancreatic β-cell tracer, (18)F-FP(+)DTBZ (n = 4); and a tumor hypoxia tracer, (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) (n = 1)-was investigated in a study of 12 human subjects. Both rest and stress studies were performed for (82)Rb. The Anzai belt system was used to record respiratory motion. Three-dimensional internal organ motion in high temporal resolution was calculated by INTEX to guide event-by-event respiratory motion correction of target organs in each dynamic frame. Time-activity curves of regions of interest drawn based on end-expiration PET images were obtained. For (82)Rb studies, K1 was obtained with a 1-tissue model using a left-ventricle input function. Rest-stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were determined. For (18)F-FP(+)DTBZ studies, the total volume of distribution was estimated with arterial input functions using the multilinear analysis 1 method. For the (18)F-FMISO study, the net uptake rate Ki was obtained with a 2-tissue irreversible model using a left-ventricle input function. All parameters were compared with the values derived without motion correction.
RESULTS: With INTEX, K1 and MBF increased by 10% ± 12% and 15% ± 19%, respectively, for (82)Rb stress studies. CFR increased by 19% ± 21%. For studies with motion amplitudes greater than 8 mm (n = 3), K1, MBF, and CFR increased by 20% ± 12%, 30% ± 20%, and 34% ± 23%, respectively. For (82)Rb rest studies, INTEX had minimal effect on parameter estimation. The total volume of distribution of (18)F-FP(+)DTBZ and Ki of (18)F-FMISO increased by 17% ± 6% and 20%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Respiratory motion can have a substantial impact on dynamic PET in the thorax and abdomen. The INTEX method using continuous external motion data substantially changed parameters in kinetic modeling. More accurate estimation is expected with INTEX.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INTEX; dynamic PET imaging; respiratory motion correction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26912437     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.167676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  15 in total

1.  Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over static 18F-FDG PET as a function of injected dose.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Jing Wu; Yihuan Lu; Mika Naganawa; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Tianyu Ma; Yaqiang Liu; Lynn Tanoue; Frank Detterbeck; Justin Blasberg; Ming-Kai Chen; Michael Casey; Richard E Carson; Chi Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Motion Correction and Its Impact on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measures with PET.

Authors:  Marina Piccinelli; John R Votaw; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Blood pool and tissue phase patient motion effects on 82rubidium PET myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy; Benjamin C Lee; Jonathan B Moody; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; Amanda C Melvin; Richard L Weinberg; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Data-driven event-by-event respiratory motion correction using TOF PET list-mode centroid of distribution.

Authors:  Silin Ren; Xiao Jin; Chung Chan; Yiqiang Jian; Tim Mulnix; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  MR-based cardiac and respiratory motion correction of PET: application to static and dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG imaging.

Authors:  Y Petibon; T Sun; P K Han; C Ma; G El Fakhri; J Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Impact of motion and partial volume effects correction on PET myocardial perfusion imaging using simultaneous PET-MR.

Authors:  Yoann Petibon; Nicolas J Guehl; Timothy G Reese; Behzad Ebrahimi; Marc D Normandin; Timothy M Shoup; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Improved Detection of Small Pulmonary Nodules Through Simultaneous MR/PET Imaging.

Authors:  Fernando E Boada; Thomas Koesters; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Body motion detection and correction in cardiac PET: Phantom and human studies.

Authors:  Tao Sun; Yoann Petibon; Paul K Han; Chao Ma; Sally J W Kim; Nathaniel M Alpert; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Non-Rigid Event-by-Event Continuous Respiratory Motion Compensated List-Mode Reconstruction for PET.

Authors:  Chung Chan; John Onofrey; Yiqiang Jian; Mary Germino; Xenophon Papademetris; Richard E Carson; Chi Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  High Single Doses of Radiation May Induce Elevated Levels of Hypoxia in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors.

Authors:  Olivia J Kelada; Roy H Decker; Sameer K Nath; Kimberly L Johung; Ming-Qiang Zheng; Yiyun Huang; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Chi Liu; Richard E Carson; Uwe Oelfke; David J Carlson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.