Literature DB >> 30095083

Improved discrimination between benign and malignant LDCT screening-detected lung nodules with dynamic over static 18F-FDG PET as a function of injected dose.

Qing Ye1, Jing Wu, Yihuan Lu, Mika Naganawa, Jean-Dominique Gallezot, Tianyu Ma, Yaqiang Liu, Lynn Tanoue, Frank Detterbeck, Justin Blasberg, Ming-Kai Chen, Michael Casey, Richard E Carson, Chi Liu.   

Abstract

Lung cancer mortality rate can be significantly reduced by up to 20% through routine low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, which, however, has high sensitivity but low specificity, resulting in a high rate of false-positive nodules. Combining PET with CT may provide more accurate diagnosis for indeterminate screening-detected nodules. In this work, we investigated low-dose dynamic 18F-FDG PET in discrimination between benign and malignant nodules using a virtual clinical trial based on patient study with ground truth. Six patients with initial LDCT screening-detected lung nodules received 90 min single-bed PET scans following a 10 mCi FDG injection. Low-dose static and dynamic images were generated from under-sampled list-mode data at various count levels (100%, 50%, 10%, 5%, and 1%). A virtual clinical trial was performed by adding nodule population variability, measurement noise, and static PET acquisition start time variability to the time activity curves (TACs) of the patient data. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to estimate the classification capability of standardized uptake value (SUV) and net uptake constant K i from their simulated benign and malignant distributions. Various scan durations and start times (t *) were investigated in dynamic Patlak analysis to optimize simplified acquisition protocols with a population-based input function (PBIF). The area under curve (AUC) of ROC analysis was higher with increased scan duration and earlier t *. Highly similar results were obtained using PBIF to those using image-derived input function (IDIF). The AUC value for K i using optimized t * and scan duration with 10% dose was higher than that for SUV with 100% dose. Our results suggest that dynamic PET with as little as 1 mCi FDG could provide discrimination between benign and malignant lung nodules with higher than 90% sensitivity and specificity for patients similar to the pilot and simulated population in this study, with LDCT screening-detected indeterminate lung nodules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30095083      PMCID: PMC6158045          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad97f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  45 in total

1.  Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.

Authors:  Sergios Gatidis; Christian Würslin; Ferdinand Seith; Jürgen F Schäfer; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Nina F Schwenzer; Holger Schmidt
Journal:  Hell J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.102

2.  Early lung cancer detection using spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Gorka Bastarrika; María José García-Velloso; Maria Dolores Lozano; Usua Montes; Wenceslao Torre; Natalia Spiteri; Arantza Campo; Luis Seijo; Ana Belén Alcaide; Jesús Pueyo; David Cano; Isabel Vivas; Octavio Cosín; Pablo Domínguez; Patricia Serra; José A Richter; Luis Montuenga; Javier J Zulueta
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET.

Authors:  W A Weber; S I Ziegler; R Thödtmann; A R Hanauske; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Voxel-based estimation of kinetic model parameters of the L-[1-(11)C]leucine PET method for determination of regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis: validation and comparison with region-of-interest-based methods.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Alessandra Bertoldo; Shrinivas Bishu; Aaron Unterman; Carolyn Beebe Smith; Kathleen C Schmidt
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Suga; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Atsuto Hiyama; Kazurou Sugi; Kazutomo Okabe; Tsuneo Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Ueda; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Naofumi Matsunaga
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Bingsheng Huang; Martin Wai-Ming Law; Pek-Lan Khong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Low Dose PET Image Reconstruction with Total Variation Using Alternating Direction Method.

Authors:  Xingjian Yu; Chenye Wang; Hongjie Hu; Huafeng Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Population-based input function modeling for [(18)F]FMPEP-d 2, an inverse agonist radioligand for cannabinoid CB1 receptors: validation in clinical studies.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Jussi Hirvonen; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Sami S Zoghbi; Denise Rallis-Frutos; Marilyn A Huestis; Cheryl Morse; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of 18F-FDG uptake time on lesion detectability in PET imaging of early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Hannah M Linden; Alena Novakova; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Brenda F Kurland; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2015-09

10.  Comparison of three-parameter kinetic model analysis to standard Patlak's analysis in 18F-FDG PET imaging of lung cancer patients.

Authors:  E Laffon; M L Calcagni; G Galli; A Giordano; A Capotosti; R Marthan; L Indovina
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improved Clinical Workflow for Whole-Body Patlak Parametric Imaging Using Two Short Dynamic Acquisitions.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Ying Miao; Wenjing Yu; Gan Zhu; Tao Wu; Xuefeng Zhao; Guangjie Yuan; Biao Li; Huiqin Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Comparison between a dual-time-window protocol and other simplified protocols for dynamic total-body 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  Zhenguo Wang; Yaping Wu; Xiaochen Li; Yan Bai; Hongzhao Chen; Jie Ding; Chushu Shen; Zhanli Hu; Dong Liang; Xin Liu; Hairong Zheng; Yongfeng Yang; Yun Zhou; Meiyun Wang; Tao Sun
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Short-time-window Patlak imaging using a population-based arterial input function and optimized Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Takato Tanaka; Masatoyo Nakajo; Hirofumi Kawakami; Eriko Motomura; Tomofumi Fujisaka; Satoko Ojima; Yasumasa Saigo; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.434

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.