Alex D Sweeney 1 , Matthew L Carlson 1 , Carla V Valenzuela 1 , George B Wanna 1 , Alejandro Rivas 1 , Marc L Bennett 1 , David S Haynes 2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator (RS) placement using a tight subperiosteal pocket technique without device fixation and (2) to compare the efficiency of this approach with the traditional bony well and trough technique. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with planned chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary academic referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All cochlear implant surgeries utilizing a tight subperiosteal pocket without additional fixation or use of a bone well were identified retrospectively. Revision cases were only included if the tight subperiosteal pocket technique was used during the initial surgery. Patients with less than 6 months of postoperative follow-up were excluded. Primary outcome measures included RS migration, flap complications, device failure, and percentage reduction in operative time. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight cases (average age 45.3 years) met inclusion criterion and were analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 18.1 months, no patient experienced RS migration. One patient experienced a postoperative hematoma that was managed with observation. One patient developed a surgical site infection that resolved following exploration and intravenous antibiotics. The subperiosteal pocket technique resulted in an 18.9% reduction in total operative time compared to a more conventional RS placement method (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation is a safe, durable, and time-saving technique for RS placement during cochlear implantation. Notably, device migration and flap complications are very uncommon. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator (RS ) placement using a tight subperiosteal pocket technique without device fixation and (2) to compare the efficiency of this approach with the traditional bony well and trough technique. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with planned chart review. SETTING: Single tertiary academic referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All cochlear implant surgeries utilizing a tight subperiosteal pocket without additional fixation or use of a bone well were identified retrospectively. Revision cases were only included if the tight subperiosteal pocket technique was used during the initial surgery. Patients with less than 6 months of postoperative follow-up were excluded. Primary outcome measures included RS migration, flap complications, device failure, and percentage reduction in operative time. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-eight cases (average age 45.3 years) met inclusion criterion and were analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 18.1 months, no patient experienced RS migration. One patient experienced a postoperative hematoma that was managed with observation. One patient developed a surgical site infection that resolved following exploration and intravenous antibiotics. The subperiosteal pocket technique resulted in an 18.9% reduction in total operative time compared to a more conventional RS placement method (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The tight subperiosteal pocket without fixation is a safe, durable, and time-saving technique for RS placement during cochlear implantation. Notably, device migration and flap complications are very uncommon. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
cochlear implant; sensorineural hearing loss; subperiosteal pocket; surgical technique; tight pocket
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2015
PMID: 25605691 DOI: 10.1177/0194599814567111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 0194-5998 Impact factor: 3.497