Literature DB >> 26906525

Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

Marimer Santiago-Rivas1, Shayna Benjamin2, Lina Jandorf2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the literature on breast density knowledge and breast density awareness to explore what challenges are faced by this area of research.
METHOD: A review of PubMED, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases was performed. Studies were published in peer-reviewed journals (in all years available) and written in English. The broad search terms used were ["breast density"] AND ["knowledge" OR "awareness"]. Eligible articles were included in the final analysis after meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) the records had to quantitatively examine and report breast density knowledge and awareness, (2) the number of participants in the sample had to be clearly specified, and (3) studies reporting differences in breast density knowledge and awareness between racial and ethnic groups were included in the review.
RESULTS: Of the 277 articles identified, only 5 met inclusion criteria and addressed breast density knowledge and awareness. Characteristics of studies and results were examined.
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to determine a pattern of breast density knowledge and awareness in women. More quality studies are needed that focus on how well women understand the relationship between breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast cancer screening, especially in diverse populations.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast density; community health; health literacy; health outcomes; health promotion; prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26906525      PMCID: PMC5932680          DOI: 10.1177/2150131916633138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health        ISSN: 2150-1319


  26 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Variation in mammographic breast density by race.

Authors:  A Y El-Bastawissi; E White; M T Mandelson; S Taplin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.

Authors:  Dana S Al Mousa; Patrick C Brennan; Elaine A Ryan; Warwick B Lee; Jennifer Tan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  What effect does mammographic breast density have on lesion detection in digital mammography?

Authors:  D S A L Mousa; E A Ryan; C Mello-Thoms; P C Brennan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; V Shane Pankratz; Christopher G Scott; Lothar Haeberle; Elad Ziv; Matthew R Jensen; Kathleen R Brandt; Dana H Whaley; Janet E Olson; Katharina Heusinger; Carolin C Hack; Sebastian M Jud; Matthias W Beckmann; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Jeffrey A Tice; Aaron D Norman; Julie M Cunningham; Kristen S Purrington; Douglas F Easton; Thomas A Sellers; Karla Kerlikowske; Peter A Fasching; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Impact of the California breast density law on primary care physicians.

Authors:  Kathleen A Khong; Jonathan Hargreaves; Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Women's responses to information on mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Joan L Bottorff; Pamela A Ratner; Joy L Johnson; T Gregory Hislop; Jane A Buxton; Cornelia Zeisser; Weihong Chen; Birgit Reime
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2007-03

9.  Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates?

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Anna H Wu; W James Gauderman; Leslie Bernstein; Huiyan Ma; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine Vachon; Marije F Bakker; Graham G Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M L Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; John L Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard A Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F Boyd; Carla H van Gils; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  8 in total

1.  "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Authors:  Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda; Rachel C Shelton; Carmen B Rodriguez; Arielle T Coq; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Janna Z Andrews; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Randomized Trial of Personalized Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Notification.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Catherine S Giess; Kimberly A Harris; Julia Ansolabehere; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial.

Authors:  Siobhan S Mahorter; Sarah Knerr; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Karen J Wernli; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Effect of a Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention on Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Suzanne C O'Neill; Tengfei Li; Sarah Knerr; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz; Jinani Jayasekera; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; David Farrell; Hongyuan Gao; Amanda L Graham; George Luta; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Marco Caballo; Eloy García; Oliver Diaz; John M Boone; David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Predominantly Hispanic Women: Does Breast Density Notification Matter?

Authors:  Jessica D Austin; Mariangela Agovino; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mary Beth Terry; Rachel C Shelton; Ying Wei; Elise Desperito; Karen M Schmitt; Rita Kukafka; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Impact of Awareness of Breast Density on Perceived Risk, Worry, and Intentions for Future Breast Cancer Screening among Korean Women.

Authors:  Anh Thi Ngoc Tran; Ji Hae Hwang; Eunji Choi; Yun Yeong Lee; Mina Suh; Chan Wha Lee; Yeol Kim; Kui Son Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.679

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.